• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lara Logan's Bogus "Correction"

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
When CBS presented bogus letters concerning George W. Bush's air national guard status a commission was formed, heads rolled... But when they presented a man who lied and said he was a witness to the Benghazi attack all they do is issue a 90-second "correction?" This cannot stand.

Lara Logan's Bogus "Correction"

I just watched the 60 Minutes "correction"/apology tonight and thought was pretty amazing for its brevity, lack of substance and general obfuscation. If you didn't watch 60 Minutes tonight, it won't take long. It only lasted 90s or so. And you can see it here.

In a narrow sense, Lara Logan did say she was "sorry." But the entire 90 seconds was aimed at obfuscating what happened.

Logan said 60 Minutes had found out Thursday that they had been "misled and it was a mistake to include him in our report."

Include him in their report? He was the report. And even in conceding that her team had been "misled", Logan tiptoed around the real news, which is that it seems clear that Davies' entire story was a fabrication. He wasn't there. So none of the stuff he did could have happened and he cannot have witnessed any of what he claimed to describe.

Read more at the link above


THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA OR ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON!!
 
When CBS presented bogus letters concerning George W. Bush's air national guard status a commission was formed, heads rolled... But when they presented a man who lied and said he was a witness to the Benghazi attack all they do is issue a 90-second "correction?" This cannot stand.

Lara Logan's Bogus "Correction"

I just watched the 60 Minutes "correction"/apology tonight and thought was pretty amazing for its brevity, lack of substance and general obfuscation. If you didn't watch 60 Minutes tonight, it won't take long. It only lasted 90s or so. And you can see it here.

In a narrow sense, Lara Logan did say she was "sorry." But the entire 90 seconds was aimed at obfuscating what happened.

Logan said 60 Minutes had found out Thursday that they had been "misled and it was a mistake to include him in our report."

Include him in their report? He was the report. And even in conceding that her team had been "misled", Logan tiptoed around the real news, which is that it seems clear that Davies' entire story was a fabrication. He wasn't there. So none of the stuff he did could have happened and he cannot have witnessed any of what he claimed to describe.

Read more at the link above


THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA OR ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON!!

its a difference between being the recipant of a fabricated story and not do the leg work to verify the story like what 60 minutes did and being the fabricated story like CBS did with the Bush bogus letters
 
Its a very intriguing case. I have not read the man's book but I'm told in the book he said he gave his employer a false report because to tell them the truth would get him fired. Now CBS uses that to say he's a liar - when they knew it the day they got his book? This smells of the hildabeast protection club.
 
When CBS presented bogus letters concerning George W. Bush's air national guard status a commission was formed, heads rolled... But when they presented a man who lied and said he was a witness to the Benghazi attack all they do is issue a 90-second "correction?" This cannot stand.

Lara Logan's Bogus "Correction"

I just watched the 60 Minutes "correction"/apology tonight and thought was pretty amazing for its brevity, lack of substance and general obfuscation. If you didn't watch 60 Minutes tonight, it won't take long. It only lasted 90s or so. And you can see it here.

In a narrow sense, Lara Logan did say she was "sorry." But the entire 90 seconds was aimed at obfuscating what happened.

Logan said 60 Minutes had found out Thursday that they had been "misled and it was a mistake to include him in our report."

Include him in their report? He was the report. And even in conceding that her team had been "misled", Logan tiptoed around the real news, which is that it seems clear that Davies' entire story was a fabrication. He wasn't there. So none of the stuff he did could have happened and he cannot have witnessed any of what he claimed to describe.

Read more at the link above


THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA OR ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON!!

Well, looks like that's all you are going to get.

Mountains and molehills.
 
Back
Top Bottom