• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alabama Man Hires KKK member to Kill Neighbor like an Animal

Fenton said:
So he hired a Democrat ?

Because the KKK is exclusive to the same party that filibustered the voting rights act in 1964.
Click to expand...
:lamoAncient history.
Modern Klan members are all NRA, libertarian republicans:lamo:lamo
 
An undercover FBI agent called Morgan a short time later, identified himself as a Klansman and asked him whether he wanted to “murder” his neighbor.
Click to expand...
If that's how it really happened...it sounds to me like entrapment.
 
NIMBY said:
You could find the Indiana KKK in the 1920's with one good google,
if you're as smart as you say you are..

If you want to deflect and deny, key components in today's Repub mantra, I'll move on..

Surely you're aware of the multiple waves of southern democrats,
like the racist dixiecrats, who converted to Republicanism after Strom Thurmond ran for POTUS in 1948 .
Click to expand...

There were KKK in California even during the 1950's.

In fact the first documented instance when a Confederate Navy Jack comparable to the Confederate battle flag was displayed at a KKK rally was post WW ll, I believe in 1948 or 49 and in the state of California.

I don't equate the Confederate battle flag to racism or slavery. I see it for what it is, a battle flag. No different that the regimental colors of the 7th Calv.

And before revisionism that's what the Confederate battle flag was, a battle flag.

Here's the problem I have with leftist revisionism, why doesn't the left in particular the Democrat Party be honest ? For over 100 years the KKK was the militant arm of the Democrat Party.

The Progressives in the past four years have been trying to claim Theodore Roosevelt and Woodward Wilson (both progressives) as their own but refuse to acknowledge both were racist.

I use the term racist as it was used before 1964, that some ethnic groups or races are inferior to others. I doubt Teddy Roosevelt hated blacks or Asians, he just looked upon them as being inferior. That use to be the definition until revisionism.

Under the true definition of "bigot", aren't most men of the cloth (religion) meet the definition of being a bigot ?
 
apdst said:
I never implied, anything. I've said straight forth that the only reason this story became a thread here was because of the racial component.
Click to expand...

It's my thread and NO that was not my reason for posting the thread. Did you even read what I posted as my concerns over this story?
 
A town named Kankakee is about an hour east of me..
Made famous by Arlo Guthrie and his "City of New Orleans".
apdst said:
You're the one suggesting that I'm wrong...so, guess what?
Click to expand...
Also made famous by two governors indicted in office, republicans..
And as a pipeline during the 1920's from Capone to crooks in Indiana, the Northern Confeds .
 
Buck Ewer said:
If that's how it really happened...it sounds to me like entrapment.
Click to expand...

Like I posted in response to MaggieD earlier, I would guess that the idiot was blabbing to locals about his intentions or shopping openly for a gun-for-hire. But, until we know for certain it is concerning.
 
APACHERAT said:
Here's the problem I have with leftist revisionism, why doesn't the left in particular the Democrat Party be honest ? For over 100 years the KKK was the militant arm of the Democrat Party.
Click to expand...
You mean the militant arm of Southern conservatives..
In Indiana, they were Republican conservatives, 300,000 of them in 1924..

The Progressives in the past four years have been trying to claim Theodore Roosevelt and Woodward Wilson (both progressives) as their own but refuse to acknowledge both were racist. I use the term racist as it was used before 1964, that some ethnic groups or races are inferior to others. I doubt Teddy Roosevelt hated blacks or Asians, he just looked upon them as being inferior. That use to be the definition until revisionism.
Click to expand...
Were you against progress--ives trust-busting, anti-monopolies, and ending the practice of "lower-class"
white children 9-YOA working in mines with missing toes and fingers??
 
I don't like how this guy got set up by the police. He didn't seek out a hitman. The way the OP story read they sought him out. He should've been arrested for harrassement and slapped with a restraining order. The hitman charge should be thrown out.
 
Rocketman said:
it would not have worked anyway, if the black man had shot at this neighbor he could have used it
Click to expand...
I see deeper in to the woods on this, sorry. That system that guy dreamed up could have worked. All the target needed to do is start a fist fight with the assassin and the assassin could pull his gun. Fortunately, the assassin was a FBI agent, so it was a no go.
 
Mr.Nick said:
It doesn't matter - if an individual with an IQ of 100 really wanted to they could master the ACT/SAT's....

I'll also say that an individual with an IQ of 100 can drain their brain real quick if they get into some bad habits, like: "lolz BFF 4 eva" - if that is the stimulus an individual is used to on an everyday basis - well, their brain is oatmeal - factor in calculators and they're basically drooling zombies with high moral regard until they hit their 30's and it's "Cherry 2000."
Click to expand...

IQ's !!!

IQ test have been labeled racist by the left.

So was the military's GCT's.

Blacks are no longer required to take an IQ test.

So since Obama falls in to of that age group of blacks and never took an IQ test and he refuses to release his SAT scores and school transcripts and we know he never made the Deans List of any college or university he attended, are we suppose to take the word of the left that Obama is smart or are we suppose to look at the total incompetency of his administration ?

BTW: An IQ of 100 isn't something to brag about. Back during the Vietnam war, it's very likely with an IQ of 100, one wouldn't meet the minimum requirements of attending Com School at MCRDSD and being assigned to a Marine rifle platoon as a field radio operator humping a PRC-25.

Another BTW: You are aware that the SAT has been dumbed down a couple of times in the past few decades to increase the scores ?
 
poweRob said:
I don't like how this guy got set up by the police. He didn't seek out a hitman. The way the OP story read they sought him out. He should've been arrested for harrassement and slapped with a restraining order. The hitman charge should be thrown out.
Click to expand...

Remember John DeLorean ?

Since the mid 1980's I no longer trust the FBI and I'm one of those pro law enforcement, rule of law conservatives. I even have a couple years of LE experience under my belt.

Since the 1970's the FBI has entrap law abiding citizens and turned them into criminals. Everyone has a price.



>" In 1984, DeLorean was acquitted of all charges after a federal judge ruled that the FBI operation had been a clear case of entrapment..."<
10. The Rise and Fall of John DeLorean
 
opendebate said:
So I find this story interesting for a variety of reasons. Here is are the main points:
Click to expand...

I quit reading at sex offender and find nothing wrong with what the man did. Too bad they were not successful in ridding the planet of one more sex offender.
 
CRUE CAB said:
I quit reading at sex offender and find nothing wrong with what the man did. Too bad they were not successful in ridding the planet of one more sex offender.
Click to expand...

Because vigilante justice should be how we handle things like this, amirite?

I don't think the "he needed killin'" defense is going to hold up in court very often.
 
Bob N said:
Major reason why I do not like this "stand your ground" law. :roll:
Click to expand...

You sure will like it when you have a chance to defend your self. Unless you see defense as just curling up in a ball and hoping the bad man goes away.
 
opendebate said:
Against making the assumption that the man who attempted to hire the undercover agent was motivated by racism.
Click to expand...

I never even alluded to you thinking such. What I alluded to was that your interest in the story was based on the racial profiles of those involved ...
 
NIMBY said:
You wouldn't believe how many Hoosiers have agreed with that, and they're above the 40th parallel..
Click to expand...

You are correct; I do not believe you or the imaginary Indiana of the C.S.A. :cuckoo: :lamo

Amazing just amazing ... lack of awareness! It is humorous, though.

Maybe another time another topic.

Thom Paine
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
I never even alluded to you thinking such. What I alluded to was that your interest in the story was based on the racial profiles of those involved ...
Click to expand...

No it wasn't
 
opendebate said:
It's funny. The part of the story that bothered me most is that, yes he is a bigoted idiot, but look at the way he got caught. Unless the article is leaving something out, which we both know it very well could be, it sounds like entrapment. I would like to know what prompted the call to this guy from the FBI agent.
Click to expand...

It could be the victim himself reported it, depending on what the maniac said while he was flinging bullets. Entrapment is a legal term, and is above my pay grade, although I suspect the guy's lawyer will argue that before a judge. The only thing I was thinking while reading that is "Thank God, the FBI guy probably saved the victim's life", because sooner or later a nutball like this will either find a real hitman or get tired of playing games and flat blow him away in his own driveway.

So personally, I'm good with what the FBI did. They saved a life.
 
DiAnna said:
It could be the victim himself reported it, depending on what the maniac said while he was flinging bullets. Entrapment is a legal term, and is above my pay grade, although I suspect the guy's lawyer will argue that before a judge. The only thing I was thinking while reading that is "Thank God, the FBI guy probably saved the victim's life", because sooner or later a nutball like this will either find a real hitman or get tired of playing games and flat blow him away in his own driveway.

So personally, I'm good with what the FBI did. They saved a life.
Click to expand...
Was it really worth saving? He is a sex offender.
 
Fenton said:
So he hired a Democrat ?

Because the KKK is exclusive to the same party that filibustered the voting rights act in 1964.
Click to expand...

You might want to do some history homework my friend. Have you ever ask yourself what ever happen to those democrats? You do know most of the southern states use to be blue right?
 
CRUE CAB said:
Was it really worth saving? He is a sex offender.
Click to expand...

What offence was he convicted of? For that matter, what offences land you on the list?

I personally don't "hate" all sex offenders, just those who are involved with sex with a preteen (person to young to have developed sexual attributes), a severly mentally handicapped person or forceable rape offenders.
 
DVSentinel said:
What offence was he convicted of? For that matter, what offences land you on the list?

I personally don't "hate" all sex offenders, just those who are involved with sex with a preteen (person to young to have developed sexual attributes), a severly mentally handicapped person or forceable rape offenders.
Click to expand...

Iam equal opportunity. You get labeled sex offender. You are sub human to me.
 
opendebate said:
Unfortunately, there are many instances of this very thing taking place and the shooter getting off by using this law. It is not a matter of who starts it, you can SAY whatever you want. If you rattle someone enough that they loose their cool and punch you or doing anything else that makes you feel threatened..BOOM....you get to shoot them. Because YOU get to decide. If the other guy is dead he can't say..."he started it" .
Click to expand...

That is not what stand your ground laws are though.
 
CallasDowboys said:
That is not what stand your ground laws are though.
Click to expand...

The way the laws are written vary. In some states, where they are poorly written, they are being abused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom