- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Small Town Turns On Girl Who Was Allegedly Raped By HS Football Player [#303, #38
As I have already pointed it out, (as also already pointed out), there is no reason to so again.
What do you not understand about that?
As you previously quoted exactly what I said you were lying about, what was it about your lies that you don't understand?
You already know what was said. Go back and read it.
Your continued deflection doesn't absolve you from your lies.
So stop lying and we can stick to the topic.
It was intentional on your part, and it is clear what you meant by mentioning it.
It was just more deflection from the topic on your part and juvenile at that.
iLOL
What is delusional here is you attributing words to me that I did not say.
What was also delusional was you saying she was a little girl when she was actually a sexually active 14 year old.
Not!
It is perfectly applicable, as it demonstrates exactly what we are speaking of.
Age matters not to the act, and that act is the same.
You wish to demean and criticize someone on what you believe.
Just as those demeaning and criticizing her are doing.
Cherry-picking? iLOL Not!
All spoken opinions of the girl, and a couple of threats, all because of her lies and false accusations.
That is only two different things going on to her.
So again, it was only reported that the teasing was done by other kids, with further implication that it was kids at other points.
Do you have anything that says otherwise?
If I am wrong point it out.
What she did was despicable and that is why she received the expressed hatred and contempt she did.
Your problem here is that you obviously do not understand that it is only your opinion that their behavior is despicable.
But it definitely is not everyone's.
You are trying to say that your abject subjectivity applies universally, and it just doesn't.
Stop deflecting.Wrong again. I have not lied. What would I lie about anyway? Since you have failed to quote any lies, then one has to assume that you are lying.
As I have already pointed it out, (as also already pointed out), there is no reason to so again.
What do you not understand about that?
As you previously quoted exactly what I said you were lying about, what was it about your lies that you don't understand?
You already know what was said. Go back and read it.
Your continued deflection doesn't absolve you from your lies.
Stop deflecting and see above.See above.
You did get personal.Seriously, do you even know what a "lie" is? Now stop with these accusations and stick to the topic.:dohI didn't make anything personal.
Another lie.
So stop lying and we can stick to the topic.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity, but with your debate technique.It was funny, so I thought I'd point it out. If you consider that ridicule, then perhaps you are a tad too sensitive.
It was intentional on your part, and it is clear what you meant by mentioning it.
It was just more deflection from the topic on your part and juvenile at that.
Wrong.No, wrong. Not towards children.
:dohHaving sex doesn't make one an adult. That's delusional.
iLOL
What is delusional here is you attributing words to me that I did not say.
What was also delusional was you saying she was a little girl when she was actually a sexually active 14 year old.
iLOLNo, you bringing Columbus into it is what is retarded.
Not!
It is perfectly applicable, as it demonstrates exactly what we are speaking of.
Age matters not to the act, and that act is the same.
You wish to demean and criticize someone on what you believe.
Just as those demeaning and criticizing her are doing.
All kind of things? iLOL Not!There were all kinds of things that happened to this girl. You are just cherry-picking data, and you've really kind of failed to make a point here.
Cherry-picking? iLOL Not!
All spoken opinions of the girl, and a couple of threats, all because of her lies and false accusations.
That is only two different things going on to her.
So again, it was only reported that the teasing was done by other kids, with further implication that it was kids at other points.
Do you have anything that says otherwise?
If I am wrong point it out.
No, :naughty that is where you are wrong.Well, that's where you are wrong. It is despicable behavior for adults (as well as other children) to torment someone like that. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
What she did was despicable and that is why she received the expressed hatred and contempt she did.
No they are not despicable. That is nothing but your abject subjectivity.
And no excuse is needed.
That would be like saying you are despicable for your criticism of Columbus. It is opinion.
It is nothing more than people speaking their opinion on what they believe to be true.
Just as you do.
It is neither despicable or commendable. It is what it is, and is normal.
In their eyes she is a liar and a false accuser. Under those circumstances, their criticism is deserved.
And no excuse is needed.
That would be like saying you are despicable for your criticism of Columbus. It is opinion.
It is nothing more than people speaking their opinion on what they believe to be true.
Just as you do.
It is neither despicable or commendable. It is what it is, and is normal.
In their eyes she is a liar and a false accuser. Under those circumstances, their criticism is deserved.
Your problem here is that you obviously do not understand that it is only your opinion that their behavior is despicable.
But it definitely is not everyone's.
You are trying to say that your abject subjectivity applies universally, and it just doesn't.