• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police: 2 Women Gang Raped By Juveniles In Wilmington Park [W: 54,119]

Wehrwolfen said:
Suspects Range In Age From 12 To 17-Years-Old

By Ileana Diaz, Matt Rivers
August 30, 2013

WILMINGTON, Del. (CBS) — Neighbors near Kosciuszko Park in Wilmington expressed anger and outrage Friday, after learning the details of a brutal gang-rape that happened in the park Thursday.

Police say two women, ages 32 and 24, were reportedly attacked and sexually assaulted by a group of 10 to 12 black male juveniles in Kosciuszko Park at about 6:54 p.m. Thursday. According to police, the suspects, who range in age from 12 to 17-years-old, remain on the loose.

The victims were transported to Christiana Hospital for treatment.

Wilmington police increased patrols Friday in the park which is located in the 600 block of South Franklin Street in the Hedgeville Community.

The women were released from the hospital Friday, but as of Friday night, police had no suspects and no witnesses.

“The new criminal we’re seeing, they’re bold, they’re brazen, and they have a total disregard for life,” said Maria Cabrera, city councilwoman-at-large in Wilmington.

Neighbors who live near the park gathered with reporters, politicians, and police for a small rally Friday against crime and in show of support of the victims.

[Excerpt]

Read more:
Police: 2 Women Gang Raped By Juveniles In Wilmington Park « CBS Philly

The local Wilmington paper dutifully said the police were searching for “teens” of unspecified race. Only later was it reported the teens – all believed by police to be between age 12 and 17 – were also black. Was this a hate crime? You decide. Imagine if the two White women were black and the teenagers white. Surely Al Sharpton the race hustler would be there lickety-split shouting no justice no peace.
Click to expand...

Who knows, but they should be glad I didn't catch them doing it. Jail would be a sanctuary compared to what I'd have done.
 
Knowledge=power said:
Who knows, but they should be glad I didn't catch them doing it. Jail would be a sanctuary compared to what I'd have done.
Click to expand...

I actually find it hard to believe there weren't any witnesses at that time of night! Hope they catch them!!
 
Before I even clicked on this topic I knew the criminals were black, how you ask? Just looked at the topic creator that's all.
 
There was also a news on reddit, can't find it now, about a french african serial rapist who raped several french women because he hated white people. He came to France simply to rape french people because of his racism. It was so sad to see just how low some human beings can steep too. I'm not sure that if you let yourself filled with such hate that you move to a country simply to hurt people there, you can even be called human anymore. Monster is more likely...
 
Unlike real people seeking JUSTICE, Al Sharpton and Shrubnose only react race hustling incidents like Tawana Brawley or Trayvon Martin. Not true racial hatred incidents. Shrub thinks Roderick Scott is a hero shooting a teenager in the back while George Zimmerman being beaten and in fear of his life protected himself.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Well that is a new standard for racism, the mere mention of, or failure to mention, a person's race. So it is racist to say that Obama is the first black president, without also saying that Washington was the first white president, or that Bush Jr. was the 43rd white president? Get over yourself, please.
Click to expand...

normally, I'd keep walking, but I've never been one to leave the scene of an accident ... so let me lend a hand ...

let's say that in a city there are 1000 rapes and 500 are committed by whites, 250 by Latinos, and 250 by blacks ... newspapers report on all of them, but give the race of the rapists only if he is black or Latino ... Do you see a problem with that?

NOW, to the dumbest part of your post ... the reason you indicate that Obama was the first black president is because Obama was the first black president ... get it? And when a woman wins for the first time, we'll say that she was the first female president. Is it getting any clearer for you? And when the first openly-gay/lesbian president gets elected, we'll say s/he was the first gay/lesbian to be elected president. It should be clear by now. If not, I really can't do anything else to help you ... sorry ...

and when you are as dense as you are, you should stay away from telling people "get over yourself" ... it just makes you look dumber ... hope I've been of some help to you today ... take care ...
 
head of joaquin said:
Maybe they could have been Boehner's son. Or Palin's (very likely).

Oh I get it, you're assuming their black because we all know black teens commit rape.

Oh the racism of the tea party types.
Click to expand...

They are black. The reports says so, read the news. You should try reading more...
 
Rainman05 said:
They are black. The reports says so, read the news. You should try reading more...
Click to expand...

So THAT's why the OP was posted -- to suggest that black teens are rapists.

I thought so.

What is it with white guy's fixation with black men raping women?
 
head of joaquin said:
So THAT's why the OP was posted -- to suggest that black teens are rapists.

I thought so.

What is it with white guy's fixation with black men raping women?
Click to expand...

The OP posted because it's news. In case you didn't notice, this is posted in the break news non-msm subforum.

Your interests are clearly to be [...] and [...]

Fill in the blanks. I'll let you know when you get it right.
 
windowdressing said:
normally, I'd keep walking, but I've never been one to leave the scene of an accident ... so let me lend a hand ...

let's say that in a city there are 1000 rapes and 500 are committed by whites, 250 by Latinos, and 250 by blacks ... newspapers report on all of them, but give the race of the rapists only if he is black or Latino ... Do you see a problem with that?

NOW, to the dumbest part of your post ... the reason you indicate that Obama was the first black president is because Obama was the first black president ... get it? And when a woman wins for the first time, we'll say that she was the first female president. Is it getting any clearer for you? And when the first openly-gay/lesbian president gets elected, we'll say s/he was the first gay/lesbian to be elected president. It should be clear by now. If not, I really can't do anything else to help you ... sorry ...

and when you are as dense as you are, you should stay away from telling people "get over yourself" ... it just makes you look dumber ... hope I've been of some help to you today ... take care ...
Click to expand...

How does what a newspaper reports make anyone but that reporter/editor "racist"? To purposefully include or exclude race when it is of no consequence may indicate racism, but how can one possibly have affirmative action without doing just that? What you have described is basically a system of "good" use of race (1st black to do X) or "bad" use of race (the killer was a young, black male) totally dependent on the alleged (perceived?) "motive" for including race. United Negro College Fund = good, United White College Fund = hate group.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Threads merged.
 
Wehrwolfen said:
Unlike real people seeking JUSTICE, Al Sharpton and Shrubnose only react race hustling incidents like Tawana Brawley or Trayvon Martin. Not true racial hatred incidents. Shrub thinks Roderick Scott is a hero shooting a teenager in the back while George Zimmerman being beaten and in fear of his life protected himself.
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
Discuss the topic, not other posters.
 
Wehrwolfen said:
Message received, kindly pass it on to Shrubnose too.
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
Do NOT comment on moderation publicly. The result could be a significant infraction.
 
ReformCollege said:
Just admit that the claim that GZ is a racist was unfounded and you won't have to :).
Click to expand...

We have talked about this ad nauseam. There is no way to know. Not for certain. Some believe, based on what they claim to know of him that it is not possible...others see it plainly. No one can claim certainty.
 
Rocketman said:
Do you know anyone that has experienced 200 years of racism, I don't.
Click to expand...
Careful, because black people are not the only ones still fighting battles that should have been settled by the civil war.
 
shrubnose said:
Videotape them and their white-sheet wearing good buddies burning a cross on someone's lawn?
Click to expand...

I fear that may be what they require. Apparently the only time some will even consider racism is present is if the accused steps up and and confesses. I'm wouldn't hold my breath for that.
 
opendebate said:
how exactly do you prove conclusively that anyone is a racist. You can skip the wide sheet and the burning cross and still be racist.
Click to expand...

wehrwolfen said:
unlike real people seeking justice, al sharpton and shrubnose only react race hustling incidents like tawana brawley or trayvon martin. Not true racial hatred incidents.
shrub thinks roderick scott is a hero shooting a teenager in the back while george zimmerman being beaten and in fear of his life protected himself.
Click to expand...





how do you know what shrub thinks?

Are you a frickin' mind reader?
Click to expand...
 
It is impossible to prove a negative such as someone is not a racist but there should be evidence of racism before you accuse someone of racism.
 
opendebate said:
That is an enormous leap. From it's hard to conclusively prove someone is a racist to implying that he is being accused of a hate crime. calm down.
Click to expand...

Calm down?

I supplied the proof necessary for the conviction of a hate crime. I think that's a very logical and fair response to your question (~'how to prove racism').

I think your obsession with the difficulty of proving racism is based in a desire to make the accusation willy-nilly. It's a very ugly accusation. While I agree that racism is still prevelant in today's US, using that accusation as a constant crutch is wrong and counter-productive.

The evidence is clear. Calling Z a racist is BS.


I've noticed that you often employ the arguments of "calm down", "don't jump on me" and "why are you yelling". And each time I've seen those from you, it was BS. How about you quit playing the victim both personally and with bogus claims of racism. Pretending to be unfairly addressed looks like a mindless shill seeking emotional ass kissing.
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
Calm down?

I supplied the proof necessary for the conviction of a hate crime. I think that's a very logical and fair response to your question (~'how to prove racism').

I think your obsession with the difficulty of proving racism is based in a desire to make the accusation willy-nilly. It's a very ugly accusation. While I agree that racism is still prevelant in today's US, using that accusation as a constant crutch is wrong and counter-productive.

The evidence is clear. Calling Z a racist is BS.
I've noticed that you often employ the arguments of "calm down", "don't jump on me" and "why are you yelling". And each time I've seen those from you, it was BS. How about you quit playing the victim both personally and with bogus claims of racism. Pretending to be unfairly addressed looks like a mindless shill seeking emotional ass kissing.
Click to expand...

Well if your opinion was remotely relevant I suppose I would care.

I think your blanket denial of even the possibility of it in many of the stories that have been brought to this forum is symptomatic of people who don't want to face the harsh reality of it's prevalence. Just because YOU don't see something as having a racist component does not mean it does not exist. You are hardly an expert. Being emphatic about your opinion does not make your opinion right. And something doesn't need to be as extreme as a hate crime for it to be wrong.

As for my requests that people pull their panties out their ***..when they get all tied up and start throwing out accusations and behaving aggressively when it is not called for, I have every right to draw the line where I see fit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom