- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,769
- Reaction score
- 1,936
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic
If you google "homosexuality is a birth defect" you will see discussion sites and blogs everywhere commenting on that fact since that study was revealed.
Dr. Rice and his team are quite aware of the controversy of their findings, and, being obviously intelligent people, are aware that their findings do indeed make homosexuality a birth defect.
But in the face of an uproar from misguided gay activists, such as yourself, they have been silent so far in answering the direct question, likely out of fear of losing their grants and positions from media-frenzy backlash.
So, with that huge reality in mind, wouldn't you think that if they didn't think that their findings made homosexuality a birth defect that they'd simply come out and say so?
Yes, that's right, they would.
But, they haven't.
Why do you suppose that is?
What rational and cogent explanation do you give for their silence on the matter?
Their silence is deafening in support of the obvious conclusion that their presentation makes homosexuality a birth defect.
You can pretend to dumb yourself down to these realities.
But it's clear to all who pass this way that's all you're doing, whether or not those who pass this way like the fact that the epigenetic etiology of homosexuality makes it an obvious birth defect.
The question is, why are you so actively engaged in this obvious disinformation campaign of yours?
What do you personally have to gain by denying the obvious birth defect reality of homosexuality revealed by this study?
Still no evidence, eh? Where is that email? Where are those quotes? I know that you will never admit just how badly you have been defeated, and how completely your position has been proven wrong. As I have told you, my job is just to keep pointing it out and challenging you to prove what you have said (while you fail to do so) so no one believes your misinformation.
Dr. Rice and his team presented the epigenetic etiology of homosexuality, making it crystal clear that homosexuality is a birth defect.Since they never concluded or stated that homosexuality is a birth defect, nothing you said above is credible. Of course, you could provide the quotes that prove your position... if they actually existed.
If you google "homosexuality is a birth defect" you will see discussion sites and blogs everywhere commenting on that fact since that study was revealed.
Dr. Rice and his team are quite aware of the controversy of their findings, and, being obviously intelligent people, are aware that their findings do indeed make homosexuality a birth defect.
But in the face of an uproar from misguided gay activists, such as yourself, they have been silent so far in answering the direct question, likely out of fear of losing their grants and positions from media-frenzy backlash.
So, with that huge reality in mind, wouldn't you think that if they didn't think that their findings made homosexuality a birth defect that they'd simply come out and say so?
Yes, that's right, they would.
But, they haven't.
Why do you suppose that is?
What rational and cogent explanation do you give for their silence on the matter?
Their silence is deafening in support of the obvious conclusion that their presentation makes homosexuality a birth defect.
You can pretend to dumb yourself down to these realities.
But it's clear to all who pass this way that's all you're doing, whether or not those who pass this way like the fact that the epigenetic etiology of homosexuality makes it an obvious birth defect.
The question is, why are you so actively engaged in this obvious disinformation campaign of yours?
What do you personally have to gain by denying the obvious birth defect reality of homosexuality revealed by this study?