Papa bull
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2013
- Messages
- 6,927
- Reaction score
- 2,599
- Location
- Midwest
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
A theory has evidence to support it and no evidence against it. The theory of genetics influencing personality traits, including sexuality and attraction, has a lot of evidence to support it and no real evidence against it. You don't want to believe it, fine. But you obviously can't refute it with real evidence.
You are equivocating. You use the word "theory" imply scientific theory and, therefore, validate your claims. Now you use the loose meaning of the word "theory" because genetic theory regarding homosexuality has NOT been validated. This is classic equivocation and is fallacious argumentation.