• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alec Baldwin using gay slurs

Alec Baldwin Twitter Meltdown Comes After Journalist Accuses Wife Of Tweeting During Funeral

"Alec Baldwin and his wife Hilaria Baldwin attended the late "Sopranos" actor James Gandolfini's funeral Thursday morning, but while they were among mourners at the New York City church, Hilaria's Twitter account appeared to remain active. After a report from the UK's Daily Mail detailing as much, Baldwin launched a Twitter rant against the publication's writer who produced the piece -- and used several gay slurs in the process."

Alec is just telling it the way it is....apparently, the truth hurts

Great actor that gives 2 ****s about *political correctness*
 
Clearly what happened here is obvious....Alec got mixed up and thought the writer was his daughter.
 
Does anyone believe Baldwin will appear on morning talk shows crying for forgiveness?
 
American defends gay bashing. Surprise surprise.

Oh come on. Feigned outrage by minority groups has become a full time hobby for these people. What would they fill their day with if we gave them nothing to bitch about? Frankly I'm surprised they have time to be producive members of society what with all the time spent running around pointing at people they are offended by.
 
Does the original report about the tweeting not bother anyone, that a "journalist" is so desperate for a slanderous headline that he would be monitoring the tweet activity of the wife of a mid-tier Hollywood personality for potential "scandal"?

Choice of words aside Baldwin is perfectly right to be enraged at such absurd minutiae, especially when his wife has a perfectly good explanation.

ADDED: not to mention that the whole basis of the report was the "journalist's" own lack of understanding of how Twitter works. No research = no problem, at least in the world of hack journalism.
 
Last edited:
Alec Baldwin Twitter Meltdown Comes After Journalist Accuses Wife Of Tweeting During Funeral

"Alec Baldwin and his wife Hilaria Baldwin attended the late "Sopranos" actor James Gandolfini's funeral Thursday morning, but while they were among mourners at the New York City church, Hilaria's Twitter account appeared to remain active. After a report from the UK's Daily Mail detailing as much, Baldwin launched a Twitter rant against the publication's writer who produced the piece -- and used several gay slurs in the process."

It is amazing what we consider news in this day and age.
 
Yeah, you're probably right. No self respecting (and let's face it, that's the only kind of respect they have) liberal would complain.

And no self respecting (and see the parenthesis above) 'conservative' would miss the opportunity to complain like a wet cat!

See what I did there???? :2wave:
 
Does the original report about the tweeting not bother anyone, that a "journalist" is so desperate for a slanderous headline that he would be monitoring the tweet activity of the wife of a mid-tier Hollywood personality for potential "scandal"?

Choice of words aside Baldwin is perfectly right to be enraged at such absurd minutiae, especially when his wife has a perfectly good explanation.

I think they harass Baldwin for the very reason that he'll respond in such an intensely, bombastic manner. It makes for good sensationalist News to show Alec having another meltdown. All he'd have to do is keep smiling, nodding and not responding and they'd get bored with covering him. I wouldn't be shocked if he does it on purpose to keep his name in the hat.
 
Does the original report about the tweeting not bother anyone, that a "journalist" is so desperate for a slanderous headline that he would be monitoring the tweet activity of the wife of a mid-tier Hollywood personality for potential "scandal"?

Choice of words aside Baldwin is perfectly right to be enraged at such absurd minutiae, especially when his wife has a perfectly good explanation.

ADDED: not to mention that the whole basis of the report was the "journalist's" own lack of understanding of how Twitter works. No research = no problem, at least in the world of hack journalism.


His choice of the word "Queen" is reprehensible. As is his additional foot up the ass and liking it comment. But your point is well taken regarding the scum reporter. On the other hand, Baldwin's previous rants muddy the water.
 
Well, he didn't use a racial slur so maybe he can sell Capital One on the Food Channel.
 
Oh come on. Feigned outrage by minority groups has become a full time hobby for these people. What would they fill their day with if we gave them nothing to bitch about? Frankly I'm surprised they have time to be producive members of society what with all the time spent running around pointing at people they are offended by.

You mean how Christians have been 'victimized' because gays are getting married? Or the way Palin was attacked just cause she was a woman? Or the way prosecuting rape is a "war on men" according to the WSJ?

That kind of victimhood?

If you're honest with yourself, you know that EVERYONE is trying to play that game.

Remember, Obama is going to lock you up because you disagree with him! Be prepared! Your turn is coming! Victim! Victim! Victim!
 
I am not sure which is worse, baldwin using gay things as insults, or the conservative whiners pretending to be concerned about anti-gay bigotry?
 
I am not sure which is worse, baldwin using gay things as insults, or the conservative whiners pretending to be concerned about anti-gay bigotry?

Post of the week!

Query: aren't almost all conservative threads disingenuous?
 
Well, he didn't use a racial slur so maybe he can sell Capital One on the Food Channel.

Or run for office as a tea party candidate.
 
Post of the week!

Query: aren't almost all conservative threads disingenuous?

I think some actually understand they really don't care about alec's comments at all which is why they have gone the paula route and are trying to turn this into a black on gay fight rather than a real fight on slurs. Others I am sure have deluded themselves into thinking that they really do care for homosexuals in this matter. Either way the only people being fooled are the fools.
 
And no self respecting (and see the parenthesis above) 'conservative' would miss the opportunity to complain like a wet cat!

See what I did there???? :2wave:

Well yeah, but since I place no value at all on your opinion it just doesn't matter to me.
 
You mean how Christians have been 'victimized' because gays are getting married? Or the way Palin was attacked just cause she was a woman? Or the way prosecuting rape is a "war on men" according to the WSJ?

That kind of victimhood?

If you're honest with yourself, you know that EVERYONE is trying to play that game.

Remember, Obama is going to lock you up because you disagree with him! Be prepared! Your turn is coming! Victim! Victim! Victim!

Let's see.. strawman
strawman
strawman

yup, nothing to see here. Have a nice day.
 
that big chip on your shoulder must be painful. No...actually its not ok whether he is liberal or arch conservative.

Here, let me size that proportional to that chip on your shoulder.
 
American defends gay bashing. Surprise surprise.

I always defend liberals at all cost, yeah you know it! :lol:



:roll:
 
Post of the week!

Query: aren't almost all conservative threads disingenuous?

Post of the week.

Query: Aren't almost all liberal posts just like this one? ^^
 
Back
Top Bottom