• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Darrell Issa's IRS Investigation Is Falling Apart

66gardeners said:
No Issa defenders here today. I guess you don't want to look the fool that he has made of himself.
Click to expand...

It's no secret that the first branch of government that Obama politicized was the Department of Justice.
The FBI is under the DOJ.

>"Judging by the scant details FBI Director Robert Mueller provided at a House hearing Thursday, it doesn’t look like the investigation into the IRS’s targeting of Conservative, Tea Party and Patriot groups is something the FBI feels very comfortable discussing.

Yesterday, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan grilled the federal bureau’s boss asking basic details on the case, but Mueller supposedly hadn’t been briefed since the investigation began. What followed was an almost comedic exchange between a befuddled FBI director and an angry state Rep. posing some very uncomfortable questions..."<
Continue: -> » Video: FBI Director Mueller Doesn’t Know Anything About IRS Investigation Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
 
head of joaquin said:
Yeah and on that thread you've post completely differently because conservatives are simply incoherent on this issue. If the GOP does it, it's good. If the Democrats do it, it's bad.

Pitiful.

The wonderful thing is most Americans get it, and Issa looks like a fool.
Click to expand...

Typical nonsense from you. I haven't posted anything "completely differently" to what is a non-existent thread. Your claims are a fail as is your extremist viewpoint.
 
clownboy said:
Typical nonsense from you. I haven't posted anything "completely differently" to what is a non-existent thread. Your claims are a fail as is your extremist viewpoint.
Click to expand...

At least I don't steal cars like Issa.
 
Erod said:
Yes, it has to be investigated and proven in the committee, but I have two eyes, a brain, and I've been paying attention, so I also know that there is a 99.99999 percent chance this was hatched by Axelrod or another of Obama's Chicago crips.
Click to expand...


Actually the EVIDENCE points to the contrary, considering Elijah Cumminga' revelations. Darrell refuses to release the complete transcripts of the interviews with the IRS witnesses. Elijah Cummings exposed that the evidence from the interviews does not point to the O administration being involved.

Issa is embarrassing himself and the republican party as a whole. Works for me.
 
Last edited:
66gardeners said:
Darrell Issa's IRS Investigation Is Falling Apart - Businessweek

Darrell Issa is an impotent as John Boehner.
Click to expand...

would like to remind every one it took a full year after the Watergate investigation started before Nixon was forced out of office,
How long has the IRS scandal investigation been going on? 3 weeks?
so go ahead announce victory before the the coin toss has even happened. burry your head back in the sand. i know you want this to go away before it goes further up the ladder. i know your scared what they will find out and wish they would stop before they find the truth.
and could you find a less bias source then Bloomberg and why are you posting an opinion peace on the breaking news thread. this post is filled with nothing but fail
 
trfjr said:
would like to remind every one it took a full year after the Watergate investigation started before Nixon was forced out of office,
How long has the IRS scandal investigation been going on? 3 weeks?
so go ahead announce victory before the the coin toss has even happened. burry your head back in the sand. i know you want this to go away before it goes further up the ladder. i know your scared what they will find out and wish they would stop before they find the truth.
and could you find a less bias source then Bloomberg and why are you posting an opinion peace on the breaking news thread. this post is filled with nothing but fail
Click to expand...

Just in case you haven't been keeping up, the evidence from the full transcripts reveals the O administration not to be involved. Issa is scrambling as we speak.
 
Elijah Cummings presses Darrell Issa for IRS transcript decision - Rachael Bade - POLITICO.com

Rep. Elijah Cummings is escalating his battle with House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa over releasing transcripts of interviews with IRS employees.

Cummings, the top Democrat on the oversight committee, on Thursday sent Issa a copy of transcripts he would like released. In a letter, Cummings asked Issa to decide by Monday which portions of the interview he would like redacted
 
66gardeners said:
Actually the EVIDENCE points to the contrary, considering Elijah Cumminga' revelations. Darrell refuses to release the complete transcripts of the interviews with the IRS witnesses. Elijah Cummings exposed that the evidence from the interviews does not point to the O administration being involved.

Issa is embarrassing himself and the republican party as a whole. Works for me.
Click to expand...

you talking about this lie Cummings made

this is what Cummings claimed the manerger said

"This Republican manager said there was no White House involvement, no political involvement, none of that. He made the decision doing the best he could to have some kind of consistency."

and this is actually what the manager said

The IRS manager, who was not named by the committee, said, “I am not aware of that,” when asked directly about a political bias or political motivations behind the targeting of conservative groups. And he said he had “no reason to believe” that the White House was involved in the decision to target conservatives.
 
66gardeners said:
Just in case you haven't been keeping up, the evidence from the full transcripts reveals the O administration not to be involved. Issa is scrambling as we speak.
Click to expand...

this is what Cummings claimed the manerger said

"This Republican manager said there was no White House involvement, no political involvement, none of that. He made the decision doing the best he could to have some kind of consistency."

and this is actually what the manager said

The IRS manager, who was not named by the committee, said, “I am not aware of that,” when asked directly about a political bias or political motivations behind the targeting of conservative groups. And he said he had “no reason to believe” that the White House was involved in the decision to target conservatives.

yep case closed you can go back to sleep now
 
So far, no solid evidence of Obama's involvement. If this investigation is in danger, it's because of Conservatives overplaying the hand. Calm down, let the evidence speak for itself, you might end up with something. But everybody who doesn't say "Yes, I got a direct order from President Obama" is jumped all over and called a liar. No wonder people aren't buying it yet.
 
rocket88 said:
So far, no solid evidence of Obama's involvement. If this investigation is in danger, it's because of Conservatives overplaying the hand. Calm down, let the evidence speak for itself, you might end up with something. But everybody who doesn't say "Yes, I got a direct order from President Obama" is jumped all over and called a liar. No wonder people aren't buying it yet.
Click to expand...

Buying it? They already bought it. Do you honestly think the IRS did this just for grins?
 
Erod said:
If you don't believe this began, was orchestrated by, and was put into action by the Administration, in the full knowledge of Obama, then you are a helpless, gullible fool.
Click to expand...

Any evidence or are you another Issa? Have you ever stolen car or two by any chance?
 
rocket88 said:
So far, no solid evidence of Obama's involvement. If this investigation is in danger, it's because of Conservatives overplaying the hand. Calm down, let the evidence speak for itself, you might end up with something. But everybody who doesn't say "Yes, I got a direct order from President Obama" is jumped all over and called a liar. No wonder people aren't buying it yet.
Click to expand...

I've often said that the GOP helps Obama by blaming him for everything ... when there is real blame to assign, no one believes them ... they seem to have forgotten the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf ...
 
windowdressing said:
Any evidence or are you another Issa? Have you ever stolen car or two by any chance?
Click to expand...


means motive and opportunity makes Obama a suspect. and you would be a fool as an investigator to not label Obama as a suspect till you have evidence saying other wise, and there is no evidence to prove Obama is not involved
 
trfjr said:
means motive and opportunity makes Obama a suspect. and you would be a fool as an investigator to not label Obama as a suspect till you have evidence saying other wise, and there is no evidence to prove Obama is not involved
Click to expand...

ah, now I understand ... guilty until proven innocent ... you're in the wrong country I'm afraid ... time to change your flag avatar ...
 
hfd said:
Please post his conviction date. What facility did he serve his sentence in? Thanks. BTW: How do you steal cars?
Click to expand...
Better than Issa: I'm sober.
 
trfjr said:
means motive and opportunity makes Obama a suspect. and you would be a fool as an investigator to not label Obama as a suspect till you have evidence saying other wise, and there is no evidence to prove Obama is not involved
Click to expand...
Thank God you are not part of the criminal justice system. You would investigate yourself for corruption. Allow me to let you in on a little secret: In this country you are innocent until proven guilty.
 
trfjr said:
means motive and opportunity makes Obama a suspect. and you would be a fool as an investigator to not label Obama as a suspect till you have evidence saying other wise, and there is no evidence to prove Obama is not involved
Click to expand...

Pssst: not only is there no suspect, but no crime.

You've been watching too much NCIS.

Issa did commit arson and grand theft auto, that's true. Maybe you're referring to that?
 
nota bene said:
Why don't you tell us all about Issa, the car thief? Maybe you know a lot more than the rest of us do from Wiki. For those who aren't familiar with the claim: Darrell Issa Makes Life Difficult for Obama : The New Yorker

I'm also really interested in why what anybody did at 17-18 is relevant when he's about to turn 60.
Click to expand...

You got your facts wrong. He was implicated in several car thefts and arson. The latter was in 1982 when he was in his 30s (and right after he increased his fire insurance!).

He also threatened an executive in his company with a gun. He was twice arrested for weapons charges in his 20s.

See a pattern of a violent thug emerging?


REPORT: Media Ignore Rep. Issa's Alleged Criminal Past | Research | Media Matters for America

Why are conservatives so soft on criminals?
 
nota bene said:
Why don't you tell us all about Issa, the car thief? Maybe you know a lot more than the rest of us do from Wiki. For those who aren't familiar with the claim: Darrell Issa Makes Life Difficult for Obama : The New Yorker

I'm also really interested in why what anybody did at 17-18 is relevant when he's about to turn 60.
Click to expand...

the guy is a sleazebag and you seem to have no idea how much it has hurt the GOP having him as the front man in this investigation ... a more distinguished GOP Congressman/woman (and you do have some) would have given the investigation more credibility ... your bad ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom