• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bilderberg 2013: Secret meeting opens press office for 1st time

Jango said:
I did not realize I was communicating with an expert on the Bilderberg meetings.
Click to expand...

You're communicating with an expert on common sense. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the Bilder Group is fed top secret information with which to dominate the world. The only reason you believe such is that you are not privy to their conversation. Like a HS kid that's sure everyone is talking about him, your paranoia has been substituted for reason.

Look, just because you're not invited to the party does not mean they're doing illegal things. Ok? It's just that the world is under no obligation to run all their conversations past Jango.
 
ecofarm said:
You're communicating with an expert on common sense. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the Bilder Group is fed top secret information with which to dominate the world. The only reason you believe such is that you are not privy to their conversation. Like a HS kid that's sure everyone is talking about him, your paranoia has been substituted for reason.

Look, just because you're not invited to the party does not mean they're doing illegal things. Ok? It's just that the world is under no obligation to run all their conversations past Jango.
Click to expand...

You brought the conspiracy stuff up and are now applying it to me? WTF is up with that noise? I was talking about them talking about open-source, confidential and classified information. But apparently that is beyond grasp. Instead, you want to make assumptions, captain common sense. But can we get back to how you know that they're not discussing con/classified information? I'm really interested in knowing how you know what they discuss, and how you make such absolute declarations.
 
Jango said:
You brought the conspiracy stuff up and are now applying it to me? WTF is up with that noise? I was talking about them talking about open-source, confidential and classified information. But apparently that is beyond grasp. Instead, you want to make assumptions, captain common sense. But can we get back to how you know that they're not discussing con/classified information? I'm really interested in knowing how you know what they discuss, and how you make such absolute declarations.
Click to expand...

Look, dude, just because you were not invited to the party does not mean something nefarious and illegal is going on. You're not invited, get over it. Who put you in charge of monitoring everyone's parties?
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
Look, dude, just because you were not invited to the party does not mean something nefarious and illegal is going on. You're not invited, get over it.
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ... where did I say anything of the sort? YOU keep bringing THAT stuff up, not me. So, can you re-address my last post, please. Properly this time.
 
Jango said:
Jesus Christ... where did I say anything of the sort? YOU keep bringing THAT stuff up, not me. So, can you re-address my last post, please. Properly this time.
Click to expand...

Hey dude, some guys down the street from me had a party last night. I'm pretty sure they're doing the world domination thing, and I think you should check it out. Perhaps you could write to the White House demanding a transcript of the party.
 
ecofarm said:
Hey dude, some guys down the street from me had a party last night. I'm pretty sure they're doing the world domination thing, and I think you should check it out. Perhaps you could write to the White House demanding a transcript of the party.
Click to expand...


How about when the truly Big Money of the World gets together, an agenda is developed to favor particular investment strategies and geopolitical alliances that protect that Big Money. That would be simple common sense if you have inherited billions or trillions. Invite all the movers and shakers so they will know in what areas funding and support will likely be available. Previously the EURO was discussed and mentioned that the original plan came out of Bilderberg discussions. Hope your transcript shows up all right. Gotta know what's up your neighbor's nose, eh?
 
ecofarm said:
Hey dude, some guys down the street from me had a party last night. I'm pretty sure they're doing the world domination thing, and I think you should check it out. Perhaps you could write to the White House demanding a transcript of the party.
Click to expand...

Why you runnin' interference, anyway?
 
DaveFagan said:
How about when the truly Big Money of the World gets together, an agenda is developed to favor particular investment strategies and geopolitical alliances that protect that Big Money. That would be simple common sense if you have inherited billions or trillions. Invite all the movers and shakers so they will know in what areas funding and support will likely be available. Previously the EURO was discussed and mentioned that the original plan came out of Bilderberg discussions. Hope your transcript shows up all right. Gotta know what's up your neighbor's nose, eh?
Click to expand...

Yes, the trillionaires are protecting their big money via government collusion. And they sacrifice babies. You know this because you're not invited.

Great.
 
Jango said:
Why you runnin' interference, anyway?
Click to expand...

Hahaha

Ok, you're not talking to someone with common sense and lacking an inferiority complex. You're not talking to someone who can see that you personally have no right to the conversations of others. You're not talking to someone capable of being left out without spazzing out on conspiracy theory. Yeah, you're not talking to someone who just looks at things for what they are...

I'm a Bilder agent running interference.

You caught me.
 
ecofarm said:
Hahaha

Ok, you're not talking to someone with common sense and lacking an inferiority complex. You're not talking to someone who can see that you personally have no right to the conversations of others. You're not talking to someone capable of being left out without spazzing out on conspiracy theory. Yeah, you're not talking to someone who just looks at things for what they are...

I'm a Bilder agent running interference.

You caught me.
Click to expand...

Why? They snoop in our conversations. Why can't we listen to theirs? What do they have to hide if IT IS JUST OPEN-SOURCE, as you say?

And, I was not accusing you of working for them, but you certainly have an interest in protecting them. Why is that?

LOL. You, a realist! HAHAHA!!!!!
 
Jango said:
And, I was not accusing you of working for them, but you certainly have an interest in protecting them. Why is that?
Click to expand...

I have an interest in protecting privacy. I don't see how just because you're not invited that suddenly you should have rights to their conversations.

Now, if you'd kindly answer your door, I believe a Bilder Agent is there to speak with you. Thank you for your cooperation.
 
Never got the big to-do about Bilderberg. It's a meeting. Not everyone goes to every meeting. There's probably like a billion this week alone that I won't go to.
 
ecofarm said:
I have an interest in protecting privacy. I don't see how just because you're not invited that suddenly you should have rights to their conversations.

Now, if you'd kindly answer your door, I believe a Bilder Agent is there to speak with you. Thank you for your cooperation.
Click to expand...

So you condemn the NSA & FBI & CIA & DHS spy operations against Americans then?
 
OldWorldOrder said:
Never got the big to-do about Bilderberg. It's a meeting. Not everyone goes to every meeting. There's probably like a billion this week alone that I won't go to.
Click to expand...

But this is the bestest party ever, and we don't get to go. It's not fair! They should be forced to release all conversations. Just because they're popular and successful is no reason for us to be left out.

I demand full access to all parties. Power to the losers!
 
Jango said:
So you condemn the NSA & FBI & CIA & DHS spy operations against Americans then?
Click to expand...

How about if we stick to the topic of the thread instead of indicting me on charges of conspiracy to commit private parties.
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
How about if we stick to the topic of the thread instead of indicting me on conspiracy to commit private parties.
Click to expand...

:lol: A page ago, you were all over the place, but now, when pressed, "Let's stick to the topic." Cute.

The correct answer was 'Yes' by the way.
 
Does that mean the converse is true for you, Jango?

What if someone is in support of the NSA collecting the metadata from all calls and texts that occur at the meeting, just as they do everywhere else? Is that fine, then? Or must it be given to you?
 
Jango said:
The correct answer was 'Yes' by the way.
Click to expand...

I'm not surprised that a Bilderbergist is an absolutist.

A page ago, you were all over the place, but now, when pressed, "Let's stick to the topic." Cute.
Click to expand...

You know that's not true, Jango. I've been entirely on topic.
 
Last edited:
ecofarm said:
I'm not surprised that a Bilderbergist is an absolutist.



You know that's not true, Jango. I've been entirely on topic.
Click to expand...

How do you draw those conclusions?
 
OldWorldOrder said:
Does that mean the converse is true for you, Jango?

What if someone is in support of the NSA collecting the metadata from all calls and texts that occur at the meeting, just as they do everywhere else? Is that fine, then? Or must it be given to you?
Click to expand...

No. I do not condone spying on our heads of state and industry. I'd prefer them to be transparent.
 
Jango said:
How do you draw those conclusions?
Click to expand...

You asked a general question covering various agencies and activities, and demand a simple "yes". That's dumb and absolutist, aside from being off-topic. Then, when your divergence into conspiracy theories and government cover-ups is rejected, you pout about it and accuse me of being off topic.
 
Jango said:
No. I do not condone spying on our heads of state and industry. I'd prefer them to be transparent.
Click to expand...

Does this mean they can't have meetings whose contents you're not privy to?
 
ecofarm said:
You asked a general question covering various agencies and activities, and demand a simple "yes". That's dumb and absolutist, aside from being off-topic. Then, when your divergence into conspiracy theories and government cover-ups is rejected, you pout about it and accuse me of being off topic.
Click to expand...

What conspiracy theories?
 
OldWorldOrder said:
Does this mean they can't have meetings whose contents you're not privy to?
Click to expand...

There are, as you pointed out, meetings all the time. But surely you can grasp the elevated importance of the Bilderberg meeting. Now, whether or not it should be private, I don't see why it would need to be private if their discussions were solely open-source material. That does not make much sense. But obviously there is nothing I can do about it, but a summary or transcript (if they were feeling transparent) would be nice.
 
I found a transcript/schedule!


10am - Syria
11am - Iraq
12pm - Sacrificing babies
1pm - The EU and the Euro
2pm - Turkey
3pm - US economics
4pm - Figure out how to prevent Jango from exposing us
5pm - Israel/Palestine issues
6pm - Snake worship
7pm - Supper
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom