So let's get this straight:
- The boy scouts are a sinful organization because they now allow sinners. (homosexuals)
Don't think that is actually how it goes, but...My opinion is that the scouts are now a defunct organization. It collapsed in the face of pressure to abandon one of its core principles. Nobody should be openly declaring any of this stuff, anyhow. Its unnecessarily not appropriate. What is the real game here, anyhow?
- There are no gradients of sin. All sin is equal in the eyes of god.
I am not a bible scholar, can you point out where it says that in their/your text? I am familiar with the concept, just cannot recall it ever having been proven.
That we are. But if we are sinners who are not actually attempting to overcome our sin, sinners that want to let everyone not only know, but also make everyone believe it is not a sin, force everyone to so believe… well, we got a different thing going there, right?
- Churches allow humans into their church, which because they're human, are also sinners.
No disagreement there.
Therefore, this church is doing the EXACT SAME THING the boyscouts are doing. They're allowing sinners into their congregation (that's the point of a church!)
What the church is doing is not the exact same thing. The each have different stations in our society. The Church is not geared towards being an ever changing, which-way-is-the-wind-blowing this year type of institution. It is supposed to be the rock. The BSA? More an ancillary organization assisting in building wholesome qualities. At least that was its previous station.
Why require this stamp, that this stain of sexuality must seep onto, into the cloth, into every single strand of everything? Can nothing be allowed even an attempt to remain pure? Can that not still be an admirable goal? The Church has as it mandate to push for purity… but
it should just have to give that up so that some can feel really good about the sin they, themselves,
have no intention of giving up? Would you not call that as close, or maybe even closer, to being real hypocrisy?
You don't see the hypocrasy in this? So the boyscouts previously let those guilty of gluttony, lust, envy, and all the other sins, and that was ok, but as soon as they let homosexuals in, that's a no-no because that sin is worse?
None of those others seem to be advertising their sins, not saying, hey, look at us, we are sinning, join us... and even if not, you
must let us join you.