• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Altered Benghazi Emails, CBS News Report Claims [W:361]

DP is full of conservatives who feel they should be able to dish it but not have to take it and go crying to the authorities. I personally have never used Reich for winger loons. I routinely use wrong because there is very little right about them. I mostly like to use fright-wing or even f right wing or other versions cause they scare the he double l out of me.
 
Ludicrous is the all-out sabotage and treason employed by the GOP since the night Obama was first elected POTUSA.
 
sangha said:
No, he did not confirm that he did not call it a terrorist attack. He confirmed that he did not use the word "terrorism".
Click to expand...

You just can't stop spinning, can you?
 
justabubba said:
weeping with laughter now that you have finally acknowledged Obama made the terror attack reference - something you and others have adamantly insisted did not happen
let's change the name of your cohort to the 'wrong' wing
Click to expand...

He did not. He made a reference to "Act of terror". Taking it out of context isn't enough for you...you have to completely reword it now?
 
mac said:
You just can't stop spinning, can you?
Click to expand...

Right Mac.....it is spin. As no one is saying that Obama didn't say Act of terror. What he is getting hammered on by the Press and Fact Checkers. Is why he didn't use the Word terrorism in the first place. Which he then later explains away on 60 mins.

While still at that time the WH is saying there is no evidence of a planned attack. Which was discovered that it was and that they knew 2 hrs into the attack.

So Obama lied, downplayed the attack. Down played we got hit on the Anniversary of 911. He also is now aware the Libyans warned us 48hrs before the attack. That it was to dangerous to conduct business in Benghazi. The Fact Checkers Timeline validates it all. Problem is Obama has deflected so much. He forgot what he said at what time and when and where. Now he is mad because his off the Cuff s**t can't work anymore.

Which still doesn't count him Being Missing at the helm. Rather than partying and going out West Coast for the election. He should have been smart enough to remember 911 and had people on their toes. But then Democrats have never been smart when it comes to Foreign Affairs or the security and sovereignty of the Country. Always lacking.
 
NIMBY said:
DP is full of conservatives who feel they should be able to dish it but not have to take it and go crying to the authorities. I personally have never used Reich for winger loons. I routinely use wrong because there is very little right about them. I mostly like to use fright-wing or even f right wing or other versions cause they scare the he double l out of me.
Click to expand...

I dont label entire political movements just because their opinions differ from mine. I expect the same respect in return. If you cant manage that, why are you even here?
 
OpportunityCost said:
I dont label entire political movements just because their opinions differ from mine. I expect the same respect in return. If you cant manage that, why are you even here?
Click to expand...

Full of conservatives does not mean all conservatives. And you know that. Clean up the people on your team who have ruined the conservative brand. And save the wicked anti-1st amendment comment about leaving here. From your interpretations, I call them the Bill of Wrongs.
 
NIMBY said:
Full of conservatives does not mean all conservatives. And you know that. Clean up the people on your team who have ruined the conservative brand. And save the wicked anti-1st amendment comment about leaving here. From your interpretations, I call them the Bill of Wrongs.
Click to expand...

Did you drop acid before you wrote this?
 
This comment is like so many other fright-wing loons launching their liquid manure. Some say meth, others alcohol, still others weed. Those who think of it have a guilt complex.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stick to the topic and cease the personal attacks.
 
sangha said:
Says the poster arguing "It's a scandal that Obama said 'act of terror' and not 'terrorism'"
Click to expand...

The scandal is lying about it afterwards. If "act of terror" and "terrorism" were the same thing, he wouldn't have agreed later that day that he didn't call Benghazi a terrorist attack.
 
sangha said:
No, he did not confirm that he did not call it a terrorist attack. He confirmed that he did not use the word "terrorism".
Click to expand...

"KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”
OBAMA: “Right.”
 
mac said:
The scandal is lying about it afterwards. If "act of terror" and "terrorism" were the same thing, he wouldn't have agreed later that day that he didn't call Benghazi a terrorist attack.
Click to expand...

He never denied that it was a terrorist attack
 
mac said:
"KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”
OBAMA: “Right.”
Click to expand...

Yes, he denied using the word "terrorism". He did not deny that it was a terrorist attack.
 
sangha said:
No, he called it "an act of terror"
Click to expand...

No, he didn't. He spoke of "acts of terror" in a general sense. Then his entire administration went full out avoiding calling it a terrorist attack for two weeks.

Only the ODS afflicted on the right think that's a scandal. :lamo
Click to expand...

Only the patently dishonest would attempt to go on ignoring the obvious at this point. Oh, wait...
 
head of joaquin said:
More evidence emerging that the GOP has edited Benghazi-related emails in order to create a fake scandal against Obama. It looks like the real scandal is going to be the one about GOP operatives engaging in what may have been criminal tampering with evidence. The question is, were Issa, Boehner and the rest personally involved?

Republicans Altered Benghazi Emails, CBS News Report Claims
Click to expand...
I understand your passion for Radical Islam and the Obama regime, but don't you think you and CBS are getting desperate here?
 
sangha said:
Yes he did. Even you agreed that he did
Click to expand...

No he didn't and no I didn't. What he did is reference "acts of terror" in a general sense, he made no connection to the Benghazi attack in that comment. Which has been more than proven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom