• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ben Carson: Liberals Don’t Like Me Because They’re ‘Racist’ (AUDIO)

Pretty much everything Dr. Carson has said, you should listen and learn from it. Let's hear what you disagree with that he said and I'll explain why you're wrong.

The interviewer was stupid when he specifically said "white liberals". It's actually the black liberals who spew racist remarks as soon as a black person announces they're republican. Look at the lovely tweets directed towards Stacey Dash when she supported Romney.

Yes, just like mr. Carson compared gays to child rapists and people who molest animals is perfectly normal and very acceptable. Or are you going to "explain" why most people disliking that statement are wrong?
 
Are you aware how racist Marx and Engels were towards blacks, jews, and hispanics?

Are you aware how racist the founders of the eugenics movement were as well? Especially towards blacks

I'm curious why you support a political ideology that is rooted in racism
The eugenics point was a joke. Also, I never even referenced Marx until you placed him into the conversation. I would still consider Marx over Carson, simply due to the differing intelligence between the two. Also, I'm a socialist, not a Marxist, they aren't synonymous.
 
So the solution the republicans have come up with for their really bad ideas is to find uncle ruckus and pretend it is because people are racist that they disagree with his stupid comments and prejudice?

Hello kettle, you're a racist...
 
Liberals are racist. They just take a different approach. They love minorities...specifically the ones who follow the NIMBY policy.
 
Yes, just like mr. Carson compared gays to child rapists and people who molest animals is perfectly normal and very acceptable. Or are you going to "explain" why most people disliking that statement are wrong?
Let's be at least a little bit fair here.

Mr. Carson did not "compare". He was talking about changing the definition of marriage from it's historic "man and woman". In a very insensitive and poorly thought out way, he used NAMBLA to illustrate how the definition could be changed to include children and he used beastiality to illustrate how it could be changed to include something non human. I agree it was a stupid way to illustrate a point but it doesn't quite rise to the level that you and others are making it out to be.
 
Let's be at least a little bit fair here.

Mr. Carson did not "compare". He was talking about changing the definition of marriage from it's historic "man and woman". In a very insensitive and poorly thought out way, he used NAMBLA to illustrate how the definition could be changed to include children and he used beastiality to illustrate how it could be changed to include something non human. I agree it was a stupid way to illustrate a point but it doesn't quite rise to the level that you and others are making it out to be.

Sorry, but I am going to vehemently have to disagree with you there. It may have been about changing the definition of marriage but he did compare the act of child molestation or bestiality to being gay. That is not illustrating something, that is saying that the wish of gays to be included in being able to marry is just as deviant/wicked at child molesters wanting to marry a child or people who have sex with animals that want to marry an animal.
 
Gays are changing it

Why do only they get the right to change it


They don't, the American people do. BTW I am straight and married, and I support changing the definition. So no, gays are not changing it.
 
Sorry, but I am going to vehemently have to disagree with you there. It may have been about changing the definition of marriage but he did compare the act of child molestation or bestiality to being gay. That is not illustrating something, that is saying that the wish of gays to be included in being able to marry is just as deviant/wicked at child molesters wanting to marry a child or people who have sex with animals that want to marry an animal.
I can honestly understand how people take it that way but what I saw was a very poorly thought out reductio ad absurdum.
 
Pretty much everything Dr. Carson has said, you should listen and learn from it. Let's hear what you disagree with that he said and I'll explain why you're wrong.

The interviewer was stupid when he specifically said "white liberals". It's actually the black liberals who spew racist remarks as soon as a black person announces they're republican. Look at the lovely tweets directed towards Stacey Dash when she supported Romney.

Michael Steele is one of the most respected black republicans on both sides of the aisle. Why? Because he makes sense when he speaks even if you disagree with his politics. His color is insignificant. That is what makes a good politician, not his color.
 
gee, now if only you could do the same for obama that would be great.

I could care less about Obama's color. People don't believe me when I say I'm color blind, but I really am. I have enough things to dislike Obama for without making it a tribute to his race.
 
Nope, still not working, but it is good to see you keep up your manipulation even in the face of overwhelming failure. If you cannot win, just enjoy losing.

Lol, Bronson isn't manipulating anything. You said in plain English he was pretty much the same thing, except better educated. All he is doing is not allowing you to manipulate your own comments to save face.
 
The eugenics point was a joke. Also, I never even referenced Marx until you placed him into the conversation. I would still consider Marx over Carson, simply due to the differing intelligence between the two. Also, I'm a socialist, not a Marxist, they aren't synonymous.

Socialism without a Marxist background is like a pitbull without teeth.
 
Yes, just like mr. Carson compared gays to child rapists and people who molest animals is perfectly normal and very acceptable. Or are you going to "explain" why most people disliking that statement are wrong?

If you read the thread, I've already clarified that you get your panties on a bunch and say he's comparing groups when actually listing groups. Apples, oranges, etc., I don't like to eat them. That's not comparing apples to oranges. Quit this "WHAT DID YOU SAY? THAT'S INSULTING!" liberal victim crap.
 
Michael Steele is one of the most respected black republicans on both sides of the aisle. Why? Because he makes sense when he speaks even if you disagree with his politics. His color is insignificant. That is what makes a good politician, not his color.

Who said Dr. Carson was a good politician due to being black? :confused:

Tell the boys on your side to lose the "token" label they're placing on him.
 
Who said Dr. Carson was a good politician due to being black? :confused:

Tell the boys on your side to lose the "token" label they're placing on him.

I do not view Dr. Carson as a politician at all. I view him as a very successful surgeon who happened to express his views.
 
I do not view Dr. Carson as a politician at all. I view him as a very successful surgeon who happened to express his views.

I agree. I was responding to Carleen saying color doesn't make you good at politics. That's a no-brainer, because Obama sucks.
 
I agree. I was responding to Carleen saying color doesn't make you good at politics. That's a no-brainer, because Obama sucks.

Color has very little to do with being a politician or a leader. I think personally, Obama has been an all right president up to this point. He is not in the top third or in the bottom third. Average is a good word. But I am afraid if the president doesn't start getting a handle on the debt, history will look back on him as being the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century.
 
The eugenics point was a joke. Also, I never even referenced Marx until you placed him into the conversation. I would still consider Marx over Carson, simply due to the differing intelligence between the two. Also, I'm a socialist, not a Marxist, they aren't synonymous.

Shows what you know about Socialism

Fail
 
Yeah...he IS wrong. liberals dont like him because he is a black CONSERVATIVE. When it is black liberals or just people like Lewis Farrakhan (cuz...he isnt really a black 'liberal'), the preferred liberal response is to merely eat it and swallow. But with a black conservative they are free to use derogatory racial epithets, etc.

No...not liking Dr Carson doesnt make liberals racist. But the fact that liberals consistently ignore violent crime, death unemployment in the black community...all the while celebrating the blood orgy involving cute little pink children...THAT kinda does. Liberals dont like black people. Well...they like their votes. So...more accurately...liberals TRULY couldnt give a **** about black people beyond their token status.

When you look at how Liberals treat black Conservatives compared to how they treat black Liberals, it's hard to argue that Liberals aren't racist. We have no choice but to hold them to their own standard.
 
Another day, another round of everyone calling eachother racists.
 
I struggle to take anyone seriously who uses the word plantation when discussing political affiliation. Appearing on Levin's show isn't too great of a start either.

What about when people say that Republicans want to put black folks in chains? Do you take those people seriously?
 
Michael Steele is one of the most respected black republicans on both sides of the aisle. Why? Because he makes sense when he speaks even if you disagree with his politics. His color is insignificant. That is what makes a good politician, not his color.

Janeane Garofalo - Racial Attack Against Michael Steele - YouTube

Slurs fly from the left - The Boston Globe

NOTHING BRINGS OUT RACIST slurs like an ambitious black man who doesn't know his ''place." So when Maryland's lieutenant governor, Michael Steele, announced his candidacy for the US Senate recently, the bigots reared up. On one popular website, The News Blog, Steele's picture was grotesquely doctored, making him look like a minstrel-show caricature. ''I's Simple Sambo and I's Running for the Big House," read the insulting headline accompanying the picture.

''Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael Steele . . . are fair because he is a conservative Republican," The Washington Times reported. ''Such attacks . . . include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an 'Uncle Tom,' and depicting him as a blackfaced minstrel."

'Party trumps race' for Steele foes - Washington Times

However, the blog has kept its headline “Simple Sambo wants to move to the big house.” A caption beneath a photo of the lieutenant governor reads: “I’s Simple Sambo and I’s running for the Big House.”
 
When you look at how Liberals treat black Conservatives compared to how they treat black Liberals, it's hard to argue that Liberals aren't racist. We have no choice but to hold them to their own standard.

So Conservative is a race now?
 
Back
Top Bottom