- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,758
- Reaction score
- 1,110
- Location
- Land of the sodomizers
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I'm not sure how anybody could like Ben Carson....his pseudo-morals belong in the 17th century.
I think you're forgetting the context of the comparison and his main point, that he doesn't think that anyone has the right to change the definition of marriage. I think his other examples were poor, but it would've made no difference if he said whether it be "homosexuals, polygamists, polyamorists, or what have you." His point was he doesn't think anyone should change the definition of marriage, regardless, including homosexuals. I may disagree with him over that point, but let's not twist it into something else.
Sort of how your liberal Congressmen and women have been playing you all along?
I doubt Dr. Carson has any desire to run for POTUS. He said what he had to say about Obamacare and it caused people like you to spin off into a tizzy. We shall find out very soon if he was correct. If he is(and I believe he is) Obamacare is going to be the albatross around the neck of the Democrats for a generation.Oh here we go again. Please, run him for POTUS. Please. And while you're at it, why not put Sarah on the ticket. I'm shaking in my boots here.
You righties are like the Black Knight. (no pun here)
I'm not sure how anybody could like Ben Carson....his pseudo-morals belong in the 17th century.
And yet...you never do address those problems. Nor SHOULD you. Truly. its NOT like you care and I can at least respect the fact you arent making some weak ass attempt NOW to pretend you do.Vance, you really are getting weak. Your argument is vapid. But hey, not at all surprising since you don't even have the stones to admit you're a righty.
Sort of how your liberal Congressmen and women have been playing you all along?
Would still be a better alternative to Ben Carson, hell, even eugenics would be.Yea what the world needs are the morals of Karl Marx or something
What could possibly go wrong?
Anyone stupid enough to defend a brilliant man for his intentional choice of words, as if somehow they were accidental, is getting played. You got played.
His choice of word must have been a complete accident. :roll:
I never said it was a complete accident. What I am saying was, he was arguing something different then what you are attempting to attribute to him. He was arguing against changing the definition of marriage. Now this is the same guy who said outright that believing in evolution means one does not have a moral code (which is laughable). But my point is I may disagree with him but I think the man would own up to his position if that is what he meant to say.
The point is that he was listing groups who shouldn't be able to change the meaning of marriage. The liberals, as usual, act like all offended as if Dr. Carson was comparing a homo getting a human dick or a horse dick up the ***.
The point is that he was listing groups who shouldn't be able to change the meaning of marriage. The liberals, as usual, act like all offended as if Dr. Carson was comparing a homo getting a human dick or a horse dick up the ***.
So those are the only groups who shouldn't be able to change the meaning of marriage.
So I guess all the other groups should be able to.
No, he was just listing a few before saying "it doesn't matter who you are, you don't get to change the definition."
Would still be a better alternative to Ben Carson, hell, even eugenics would be.
It's the same old, same old.The point is that he was listing groups who shouldn't be able to change the meaning of marriage. The liberals, as usual, act like all offended as if Dr. Carson was comparing a homo getting a human dick or a horse dick up the ***.
So those are the only groups who shouldn't be able to change the meaning of marriage.
So I guess all the other groups should be able to.
And that's why he's a moron when it comes to politics
The truth is, we are getting to change the definition.
It's happened in several states, and it will continue to change
Why don't you answer the following question as today's pop quiz question in English? If I say "Your arm and leg are attached to your body." then does that mean your head isn't?
Is marriage a civil right?
If gays get the special right to change the definition of marriage, then why can't other sexual interest groups have the same right?
And that's why he's a moron when it comes to politics
The truth is, we are getting to change the definition.
It's happened in several states, and it will continue to change
Gays aren't changing the definition of marriage. The American people are.