• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

Fisher said:
Now are the leftists and gays just so convinced they are going to win that they think they are going to win 9-0 as well. LOL.
Click to expand...

6-3 in favor of SSM
 
Rocketman said:
They can breed, just not conceive. Give in on this next thing you know some weird person will want to marry his dog for benefits.
Click to expand...

That's idiotic, dogs cannot legally sign contracts. Come on, that's really dumb.
 
Cephus said:
That's idiotic, dogs cannot legally sign contracts. Come on, that's really dumb.
Click to expand...

so is sticking a penis up someone's ass and calling natural
 
Rocketman said:
They can breed, just not conceive. Give in on this next thing you know some weird person will want to marry his dog for benefits.
Click to expand...

Hey, dehumanization: the last bastion of bigots.
 
Rocketman said:
so is sticking a penis up someone's ass and calling natural
Click to expand...

Homosexuality is rampant in the animal world. Would that not, by definition, make it natural?

Not even joking, my dog is gay as hell. He only humps male dogs. You know what? If that makes him happy, so be it. He's my son, and I just want him to be happy. Homosexuality is completely natural.

And seeing as how you don't give a flying rat's ass for individual rights, please change your lean from Libertarian - Right to something else entirely. You're embarrassing us and you have no idea what that term means.
 
Rocketman said:
so is sticking a penis up someone's ass and calling natural
Click to expand...

So I take it you're the one we need to consult on what sexual practices are natural versus unnatural? Is oral sex OK? Maybe you can make a list for us.
 
Rocketman said:
No one I know. But then again I don't hang out in the sewer.
Click to expand...

Seriously? You sit in the bedrooms of everyone you know and watch them have sex?
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Homosexuality is rampant in the animal world. Would that not, by definition, make it natural?

Not even joking, my dog is gay as hell. He only humps male dogs. You know what? If that makes him happy, so be it. He's my son, and I just want him to be happy. Homosexuality is completely natural.

And seeing as how you don't give a flying rat's ass for individual rights, please change your lean from Libertarian - Right to something else entirely.
Click to expand...

Asking SCOTUS to legalize your sexual preference is not a right. Homosexuality is a defect just like serial killers and pedophilia. Being libertatrian does not mean you give up your brain.
 
Cephus said:
Seriously? You sit in the bedrooms of everyone you know and watch them have sex?
Click to expand...

I assume you must since you brought it up, must have been how you were taught.
 
Rocketman said:
They can breed, just not conceive. Give in on this next thing you know some weird person will want to marry his dog for benefits.
Click to expand...

A dog can't give consent because it does not legally possess the mental capacity to do so. You can not explain wedding vows, or the concept of marriage to an animal. For the same reason the typical religious extremist excuse of "I guess marrying children or animals will be next" is completely irrational. Children are also not of the mental capacity to give sexual consent. You on the other hand want government to regulate sexual behavior between consenting adults. It's a very statist thing for you to want.
 
head of joaquin said:
So I take it you're the one we need to consult on what sexual practices are natural versus unnatural? Is oral sex OK? Maybe you can make a list for us.
Click to expand...

It is not my job to instruct you nor do I care how perverted you want to get.
 
Rocketman said:
I assume you must since you brought it up, must have been how you were taught.
Click to expand...

And thus, ladies and gentlemen, we see yet another example of the idiocy of libertarianism and the absurdity of the anti-gay position.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
A dog can't give consent because it does not legally possess the mental capacity to do so. You can not explain wedding vows, or the concept of marriage to an animal. For the same reason the typical religious extremist excuse of "I guess marrying children or animals will be next" is completely irrational. Children are also not of the mental capacity to give sexual consent. You on the other hand want government to regulate sexual behavior between consenting adults. It's a very statist thing for you to want.
Click to expand...

No you wanted regulated, I don't think SCOTUS should be listening to this case at all. It is you and people like you keeping our courts tied up with this silly ****.
 
Rocketman said:
Asking SCOTUS to legalize your sexual preference is not a right. Homosexuality is a defect just like serial killers and pedophilia. Being libertatrian does not mean you give up your brain.
Click to expand...

A serial killer is depriving someone of their right to life. A pedophile is having sex with someone who legally can't consent to sex.

What right is being violated by two consenting adults having sex?

Oh, and by the way, being gay is already legal, so you sound incredibly uneducated right now.
 
Cephus said:
And thus, ladies and gentlemen, we see yet another example of the idiocy of libertarianism and the absurdity of the anti-gay position.
Click to expand...

The same people that support this plead for serial killers to be set free, it is a mindset.
 
Rocketman said:
No you wanted regulated, I don't think SCOTUS should be listening to this case at all. It is you and people like you keeping our courts tied up with this silly ****.
Click to expand...

I don't want anything regulated. I'd prefer to have marriage decoupled from the state altogether. You want your jesus morality enforced on others because you believe the state is your religious enforcer.
 
Cephus said:
And thus, ladies and gentlemen, we see yet another example of the idiocy of libertarianism and the absurdity of the anti-gay position.
Click to expand...

God ****ing dammit. Stop calling him a libertarian. You ****ing know god damn well that he isn't one. I really expected better from you.

Gay hating is far, far more a conservative position than it will ever be a libertarian position. By definition a libertarian must be opposed to government manipulation of sexual behavior.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
A serial killer is depriving someone of their right to life. A pedophile is having sex with someone who legally can't consent to sex.

What right is being violated by two consenting adults having sex?

Oh, and by the way, being gay is already legal, so you sound incredibly uneducated right now.
Click to expand...

Legal goes not make it morally right. It is legal to kill and unborn kid, is it morally right, of course not. You sound like a person without a conscious or a soul.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
God ****ing dammit. Stop calling him a libertarian. You ****ing know god damn well that he isn't one. I really expected better from you.
Click to expand...

As much as you are, supporting the more government involvement with marriage decisions
 
Rocketman said:
Legal goes not make it morally right. It is legal to kill and unborn kid, is it morally right, of course not. You sound like a person without a conscious or a soul.
Click to expand...
So are you refusing to answer the question? What right is being violated by two consenting adults having sex?

I want to know how this is equivalent to murder or child rape.

Rocketman said:
As much as you are, supporting the more government involvement with marriage decisions
Click to expand...

No, I'm trying to take government out of it. You want the government to prevent religious instutitions such as gay churches from performing wedding ceremonies.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
God ****ing dammit. Stop calling him a libertarian. You ****ing know god damn well that he isn't one. I really expected better from you.
Click to expand...

Until you libertarians can all agree on what constitutes a libertarian and stop all of the anarchists, anarcho-capitalists and other loony-tunes from stamping the label on their foreheads, as far as I'm concerned, he can be whatever he wants to label himself. There just isn't a single agreed-upon definition for the term. Sorry.
 
Rocketman said:
Asking SCOTUS to legalize your sexual preference is not a right. Homosexuality is a defect just like serial killers and pedophilia. Being libertatrian does not mean you give up your brain.
Click to expand...

It means you use it. Based on your bigoted views, you are not using yours.
 
Cephus said:
Until you libertarians can all agree on what constitutes a libertarian and stop all of the anarchists, anarcho-capitalists and other loony-tunes from stamping the label on their foreheads, as far as I'm concerned, he can be whatever he wants to label himself. There just isn't a single agreed-upon definition for the term. Sorry.
Click to expand...

So I guess you'd like it if I lumped you in with the furthest right wing gay hating sect of conservatism? How are you any different?

If you want to see the definition of mainstream libertarianism, look at the libertarian party platform. You will see a shining beacon of civil rights.

Are you saying that you are willing to defend all conservative statements?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom