• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LA Times says conservative white men worse than terrorists, monitoring needed

So yes you are a dangerous person and an admitted threat. hence why you get treated as such.

You see anyone who believes in the Bill of Rights - ie civil rights - as dangerous and should be treated as dangerous. More of your support for the KKK?
 
Political Fanaticism once again tearing this country apart.



No s***!





LA Times says conservative white men worse than terrorists, monitoring needed - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com

According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.


I like this part from the Times:
 
But you're all up in arms over "disarming the poor" who obviously shouldn't be spending their money on guns. I mean, since our concern is because of the cost of weapons princing them out...

Who are you to decide what the poor should spend their money on? So in your mind putting guns out of economic reach is for their own good.
 
Who are you to decide what the poor should spend their money on? So in your mind putting guns out of economic reach is for their own good.

Usually deciding how poor people spend their money is a Conservative thing. You never see a liberal talking about sneakers.

You'll nevr put guns out of econonmic reach. You know as well as I do that gun contol laws are frequently ineffective. Given that, why the sudden concern from the right about whether poor people can afford guns? They'll be able to get theem anyway, right?
 
No s***!





LA Times says conservative white men worse than terrorists, monitoring needed - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com

According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.


I like this part from the Times:

Totally agree. These guys are the ones buying up the guns and trying to keep military style weapons on the streets. They are the ones the republicans and corporations target with every comments that screams racism, bigotry and sexism.
 
Who are you to decide what the poor should spend their money on? So in your mind putting guns out of economic reach is for their own good.

I agree with rocket88. After decades of bashing the poor for buying drugs and cell phones, NOW you want them to buy guns? What do they POSSIBLY have that anyone would rob?
 
So, you're saying that you support outright racism and sexism? You would welcome a new version of Jim Crow that would target white males? Target American citizens because of their race, gender and political ideology?


You guys are pathetic. I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.


I said "I liked this part..." because he calls out the bigots on your side. He's spot on.
 
You guys are pathetic. I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.


I said "I liked this part..." because he calls out the bigots on your side. He's spot on.

You agree with his opinion, but you don't condone such behavior? Really?...lol!
 
You agree with his opinion, but you don't condone such behavior? Really?...lol!


I agree with what the article says about conservatives being terrorist like.

I'll repost the article again for your clarification:

According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.


and im back tacking on this remark that i said:
I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.

This was meant for another topic. Wrote it in the wrong thread
 
I agree with what the article says about conservatives being terrorist like.

I'll repost the article again for your clarification:

According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.


and im back tacking on this remark that i said:
I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.

This was meant for another topic. Wrote it in the wrong thread

How are Conservatives, "terrorist like"?
 
Gotta love internet tough guys :roll:

I'm not from South Africa. I'm not going to sit back and do nothing, while Communists take over my country. Americans aren't cowards like that and it's one of the things that makes America the greatest nation in human history.
 
You are correct. What you quoted does not say that. But, what the OP quoted does.

"They're not jihadists. They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists."

In the context of the LA times editorial it is clear that the quote above refers to members of militia groups, not all white conservatives with guns.
 
I agree with what the article says about conservatives being terrorist like.

I'll repost the article again for your clarification:

According to an op-ed at the Los Angeles Times, conservative white men who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are worse than international terrorists and need to be monitored by the federal government, Infowars reported Wednesday.
The op-ed, written after the Southern Poverty Law Center demanded the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security "crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government," claims there are "cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government."
"They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal," the Times wrote.
Kurt Nimmo accused the paper of racism for singling out white men as the culprit that needs to be dealt with by the federal government.
"They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists," the Times said.


and im back tacking on this remark that i said:
I never said i support or condone this type of behavior.

This was meant for another topic. Wrote it in the wrong thread


Most murders occur in "blue" areas, meaning that in fact Democrats are murderous terrorist types. Anyone who is a registered Democrat or voted in a Democratic primary should be banned from gun ownership - and put in prison for 25 years if caught with a gun.
 
I find it humorous that the cons are going batsht crazy over this op-ed piece.

It puts a smile on my face
 
I'm not from South Africa. I'm not going to sit back and do nothing, while Communists take over my country. Americans aren't cowards like that and it's one of the things that makes America the greatest nation in human history.

Ah there you go.

Asking someone "Why do you support Racist Policies"

Whilst at the same time maintaining that South Africa was better off under White Minority Rule.

Communists are not taking over your country.

Paranoia to the max, and this vein idea that you're some kind of manly man that fights for freedom and "I'm Dangerous" just makes you sound like an idiot because at the end of the day with Conservatives like you that can't tell the difference between crap and french fries, communism and socialism just amounts to in your universe "things I don't like".
 
Ah there you go.

Asking someone "Why do you support Racist Policies"

Whilst at the same time maintaining that South Africa was better off under White Minority Rule.

Communists are not taking over your country.

Paranoia to the max, and this vein idea that you're some kind of manly man that fights for freedom and "I'm Dangerous" just makes you sound like an idiot because at the end of the day with Conservatives like you that can't tell the difference between crap and french fries, communism and socialism just amounts to in your universe "things I don't like".

The only alternative to "white minority rule" was Communism?

SA is waaaaaaay better of now...not!
 
I find it humorous that the cons are going batsht crazy over this op-ed piece.

It puts a smile on my face

But...you don't condone such behavior.
 
Ah there you go.

Asking someone "Why do you support Racist Policies"

Whilst at the same time maintaining that South Africa was better off under White Minority Rule.

Communists are not taking over your country.

Paranoia to the max, and this vein idea that you're some kind of manly man that fights for freedom and "I'm Dangerous" just makes you sound like an idiot because at the end of the day with Conservatives like you that can't tell the difference between crap and french fries, communism and socialism just amounts to in your universe "things I don't like".

Careful about our good buddy apst. He took Michele Bachmanns slogan to heart. Now he’s “armed and dangerous.”:lamo
 
The only alternative to "white minority rule" was Communism?

SA is waaaaaaay better of now...not!

Well South Africa isn't communist.

See this is why people think you're pretending to be black.

Because you think this:

sharpeville-massacre-01.gif


Was better than this:

Mandela_and_deKlerk_0.jpg
 
SPLC is a parasite organization that is a front for the creeping crud of communist malignancy

....... I'm not going to sit back and do nothing, while Communists take over my country. Americans aren't cowards like that and it's one of the things that makes America the greatest nation in human history.

No threat to the likes of the SPLC implied I'm sure. As long as the wrong people don't start working together.
 
Well South Africa isn't communist.

See this is why people think you're pretending to be black.

Because you think this:

sharpeville-massacre-01.gif


Was better than this:

Mandela_and_deKlerk_0.jpg

So, what you're basically saying is, since I don't buy into the bull****, there's no way I can be black?
 
So, what you're basically saying is, since I don't buy into the bull****, there's no way I can be black?

Since you think gunning down black children is better than a representative democracy with a left leaning party in power...

I'd find it difficult to believe a black person would rather have South Africa under white minority rule that advocated shooting black children yes.
 
Since you think gunning down black children is better than a representative democracy with a left leaning party in power...

I'd find it difficult to believe a black person would rather have South Africa under white minority rule that advocated shooting black children yes.

I never made any such comment. Don't put words into my mouth.
 
I never made any such comment. Don't put words into my mouth.

That's essentially what you're saying if you think South Africa should still be run by the apartheid government.

Because that's exactly what they did.
 
That's essentially what you're saying if you think South Africa should still be run by the apartheid government.

Because that's exactly what they did.

No, that's not even close to what I said.
 
Back
Top Bottom