• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senator Rand Paul's Epic Filibuster: Reads 'Alice in Wonderland'

"Adopting the tactics of the agressor" is what it is called......................

^
TRANSLATION: I don't have any real response, so I am going to be passive-aggressive instead. :mrgreen:
 
^
TRANSLATION: I don't have any real response, so I am going to be passive-aggressive instead. :mrgreen:

Right. Because "critical thinking" is illegal in Texas.................oh, the humanity............................
 
Right. Because "critical thinking" is illegal in Texas.................oh, the humanity............................

What you posted is very laughable. Critical thinking. I think I could very well be the definition of a critical thinker. I was bashing the hell out of Bush when Bush bashing wasn't cool. I took a lot of heat for it, but stood my ground.

As far as Texans having no mind, are you aware that the Houston area voted for Obama in the last election? No, I didn't think so. You would rather say that, just because someone lives in the South, that he should automatically be defined as a Republican. I bet you think that all Californians are Democrats too. But, best of all, I like how you attempt to support what Obama is doing, even though you probably bashed Bush for spying on American citizens while in office. Well, I've got news for you. Spying on Americans is bad, but at least those who got spied on are still alive. In this respect, you are absolutely no different than the Neocons who got us into the Iraq war. In fact, given the chance, I bet you would love to rename despicable things you don't like Republicans doing, to make them sound palpable when Democrats do it, just as the Bush administration did for their own sake. Here, let me help you out........

"We are NOT saying that we are willing to kill Americans on American soil with drone strikes, without due process. No siree. We are Freedom Frying them."

LOL.
 
Right. Because "critical thinking" is illegal in Texas.................oh, the humanity............................

You are an agitator, Bonz and you enjoy it! Soooo, before I am subjected to the response from every Texan on here, I'm going to leave the debate! :)

G'nite all. Be well.
 
To have enemies you have to pose a threat.:roll:

Yes. To have enemies you have to pose a threat......................I guess threatening the "very foundations of human civilization everywhere" doesn't quite crack it..............LOL...........................
 
Yes. To have enemies you have to pose a threat......................I guess threatening the "very foundations of human civilization everywhere" doesn't quite crack it..............LOL...........................

Sorry, Bonz. I don't feel threatened. In fact, I find your randomized nonsense reassuring.:cool:
 
Right. Because "critical thinking" is illegal in Texas.................oh, the humanity............................

"It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States.- Eric Holder.

'I haven't killed anyone yet. And I have no intention of killing Americans. But I might. - Obama


Nice, real nice there.

Have anyone else you wish defend here?

The answer to the question is no. There is no maybe in this case or that case allowed here. The answer is NO. If they can't answer no they need to removed from office.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, Bonz. I don't feel threatened. In fact, I find your randomized nonsense reassuring.:cool:

No. If we were "friends" I might deign to talk down to you-------------But we aren't, so I don't........................
 
If I was in the senate I would join him that I know for sure, but I don't know what exactly I would read. Hmm...

Any ideas?

Albert Jay Nock's Our Enemy, The State.
 
Anyway, this thread is about Rand Paul and his latest hoop dog performance to saistfy the Tea Party.....................
 
Anyway, this thread is about Rand Paul and his latest hoop dog performance to saistfy the Tea Party.....................

Really? He defends the American people and for some reason you think he is just trying to satisfy the tea party? What nonsense.
 
Really? He defends the American people and for some reason you think he is just trying to satisfy the tea party? What nonsense.

Do actually believe that crock you just spewed? I trust Rand Paul no further than I can see him.......................
 
Do actually believe that crock you just spewed? I trust Rand Paul no further than I can see him.......................

That is what he is doing, so yes, I believe it.

What you are doing here is defending a man that is apparently a constitutional scholar that is trying to ignore the existence due process.
 
Call me, "not so trusting"..............I grew up here......................

You grew up here? What does that mean? How does the fact you grew up here have anything to do with the topic?
 
Back
Top Bottom