• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Voter Fraud That ‘Never Happens’ Keeps Coming Back

Wayno said:
LOL..........

So, without presenting a VALID IDENTIFICATION, who are you going to look for?
Click to expand...

This case involved double voting, once in person, the other time by mail. How would presenting a valid ID prevent that? The person who voted was indeed that person. Double voting is prevented by comparing the rolls not using ID.

Further, pretending to be somebody you aren't and voting will show up as a double vote and be investigated under our current system -- as this case was.

The only way to commit significant voter fraud is in the registration process -- and the GOP has the lock on that kind of fraud.

http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/gop_voter_registration_scandal_widens/

NEXT DISCREDITED RIGHTWING MEME!
 
rocket88 said:
If they're joking about what they left behind, they'd be joking about where they're from, not Minnesota where they chose to live.
Click to expand...

Let me try to bring this down to your comprehension level: The people in Wisconsin, Iowa and North Dakota have every right to joke about the Minnesota they left behind. Get it now?
 
Diogenes said:
Let me try to bring this down to your comprehension level: The people in Wisconsin, Iowa and North Dakota have every right to joke about the Minnesota they left behind. Get it now?
Click to expand...

People don't leave Minnesota for any of those states. It's the other way around.

Have you ever been to Minnesota, or is it just "that cold place next to Canada" to you?
 
rocket88 said:
People don't leave Minnesota for any of those states. It's the other way around.

Have you ever been to Minnesota, or is it just "that cold place next to Canada" to you?
Click to expand...

Yeah, they do leave Minnesota. I'm one of them. Agreed that replacements keep moving into Minnesota, the welfare benefits are better than in more rational states and it's easier to game the system.
 
Wayno said:
You seem to be afflicted with a serious compunction to constantly use the word "meme...."

Are you over the age of 18?
Click to expand...

Translated: you can't discuss the topic and are fascinated with me and memes. Can't blame you.

Meanwhile, the rightwing meme that voter ID has anothing to do with voter fraud is rebutted AGAIN!
 
Wayno said:
LOL..........

So, without presenting a VALID IDENTIFICATION, who are you going to look for?
Click to expand...

Convictions. Pure and simple. lets see em.
 
haymarket said:
Convictions. Pure and simple. lets see em.
Click to expand...

Why are you bringing up a requirement for so many of the Democrat voters?

Just Google Franken Felons, and you can here from them directly....
 
Wayno said:
Why are you bringing up a requirement for so many of the Democrat voters?

Just Google Franken Felons, and you can here from them directly....
Click to expand...

Alliteration: the last basion of a conservative losing ANOTHER argument on the merits.

Tell us how voter ID requirements would affect the case in the OP. Go into detail.
 
Aderleth said:
Do you have anything of substance to say? Can you, perhaps, address any of the points made in the article?
Click to expand...

perhaps you could post something that is relevant
 
Rocketman said:
perhaps you could post something that is relevant
Click to expand...

A simple "no" would have sufficed. Since you obviously can't actually address the points raised in the article, I'm going to stop responding to you now. Have fun posturing.
 
Wiggen said:
She admitted doing it because she wasn't sure her absentee ballot had arrived. You seem to be one of those people just convinced that voter fraud is rampant. Try dealing with voters some time - as I have done. Especially elderly voters. Nobody willingly risks years in jail just for the opportunity to cast an illegal ballot which has virtually no chance of affecting the result of the election anyway and which is easily detected. Really. Get serious.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but if my second vote has "virtually no chance of affecting the result of the election anyway", how important or meaningless is my first vote?
 
Rocketman said:
Salon.com:lamo:lamo:lamo:lamo
Click to expand...

So is a blog OK, is an op/ed OK?

See, I'm confused because in another thread I had Cons jumping all over me for complaining about the source (a Forbes op/ed), and not refuting what it said. But your'e doing the same thing here. Is this another "OK for Cons, not OK for Libs" thing, or are we all playing by the same rules?
 
rocket88 said:
So is a blog OK, is an op/ed OK?

See, I'm confused because in another thread I had Cons jumping all over me for complaining about the source (a Forbes op/ed), and not refuting what it said. But your'e doing the same thing here. Is this another "OK for Cons, not OK for Libs" thing, or are we all playing by the same rules?
Click to expand...

We all play the same. Fox, huffington post, NYT, are all the same, they just lean different directions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom