• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Limbaugh: It’s Up To Me And Fox News To Stop Amnesty

And don't forget typically vote with the cons.

No true Libertarian should ever want immigration laws that keep people who want to work out for any reason.

Libertarians support pure free enterprise, and in such a system, there should be no restrictions whatsoever on who a private individual, business, or organization can hire to do work for them. All at-will employment agreements are considered valid, regardless of the ethnicity and/or residency status of the person(s) being hired.

Undocumented worker laws amount to a hiring impediment, and therefore are an affront to a pure free market.
 
I wasn't taking sides. I was simply calling you out for telling a Canadian guy to **** off. As if somehow that reaction took a great deal of thought on your part.
Yeah and you conveniently clipped off the bulk of that post which was very pointed and insightful. You are simply taking one sentence out of context as if the was the only thing I said. Looks like that is you MO, to take the remarks of others out of context to unfairly attack them. Real classy:thumbs:
 
Rush is self employed.

He's employed (under contract) w/Clear Channel.

He doesn't own the network on which he broadcasts and therefore doesn't have total freedom to say anything he wants; he has to abide by Clear Channel's TOC.
 
Yeah and you conveniently clipped off the bulk of that post which was very pointed and insightful. You are simply taking one sentence out of context as if the was the only thing I said. Looks like that is you MO, to take the remarks of others out of context to unfairly attack them. Real classy:thumbs:

You tell someone here on this board to **** off, and you suggest someone else is something less than classy? Hilarious.

Why you weren't banned from this thread is inexplicable.
 
Yeah, I've been trying to tell him that. No getting through to him.

For anybody who is wondering, libertarians are as a rule socially liberal, fiscally conservative.

Yeah, what's the world's most famous father and son Libertarian duo's stand on a woman's right to choose?
 
The 1st amendment is irrelevant. Employees can still be fired for insubordination, and rush is no exception.

Still haven't looked up syndication where it relates to radio have you?
 
Yeah, what's the world's most famous father and son Libertarian duo's stand on a woman's right to choose?

Gotta love that religious right money...
 
He's employed (under contract) w/Clear Channel.

He doesn't own the network on which he broadcasts and therefore doesn't have total freedom to say anything he wants; he has to abide by Clear Channel's TOC.

Obviously he has plenty of flexibility.
 
Nobody else would hire that bloviating Oxycontin-head.

As the highest rated talking head in the country, it looks like that worked out damn good for him.

Ain't America great??
 
As the highest rated talking head in the country, it looks like that worked out damn good for him.

Ain't America great??

As has been pointed out on numerous occasions, there is a segment of the american public that has always had an affinity for right wing racist demagogues.
 
It could. Um...has it?

That's irrelevant. The First Amendment doesn't mean that any station is required to carry him, so bringing the First Amendment into this is silly.
 
That's irrelevant. The First Amendment doesn't mean that any station is required to carry him, so bringing the First Amendment into this is silly.

I threw the 1st Amendment in there, because there are some folks that believe that the 1st Amendment isn't restrictive enough.
 
As has been pointed out on numerous occasions, there is a segment of the american public that has always had an affinity for right wing racist demagogues.

And, you're referring to Rush? Is this another lame attempt to lable Conservatives racists?
 
The road to amnesty should be filled with bullets.

Be careful what you wish for, it can easily become a two way range and few 'patriots' here have been on one, or have the cojones for one.

Rush has it down cold, be outrageous and flame everyone. He feeds his Rush Trolls and when he gets blowback, why he was just being sarcastic or doing his theater of the absurd... :roll:

Nothing wrong with our nation taking on a bit more flavor. ALL immigrant waves have followed the same path from 'low skill' workers to business leaders. Many early immigrants came here as indentured servants, hardly a high browed entry to this country.

Latinos will be a good addition to a nation of immigrants. Remember the Irish and Eye-taliens were not welcomed with open arms and they somehow managed to blend in... ;)
 
Why is it that Libbos constantly take Conservative comments out of context, to achieve the desired effect?

Because conservatives say stupid odious things and pretend they mean something else?
 
Yeah, what's the world's most famous father and son Libertarian duo's stand on a woman's right to choose?

Opposing murder is not a question of social liberty.
 
And Libbos NEVER do that. Right? LOL!!

No, but that's another thread. This one is about Limbaugh and the stupid things he says to his tea party cult.
 
Back
Top Bottom