• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Limbaugh: It’s Up To Me And Fox News To Stop Amnesty

The familiar rightwing radio refrain. Rush keeps telling you, you keep repeating.

Say it as many times as you like. It's still pathetic.

Only Leftists can leap to such ridiculous conclusions. I don't even get Rush Limbaugh where I live. I'm only observing that the usual suspects are still having hissy fits over him and Fox News.
 
Yeah, because in your universe all the rest of the folks are either not watching/listening to TV news,the radio or they're watching/listening to a liberal biased station.

In my universe there are 312 million Americans. Of which about 3.5 million listen to Limbaugh at any given time during his broadcast.
 
That 6% certainly seems to have the Leftists rattled.

On the contrary. I have stated repeatedly that I want Limbaugh, O'reilly, Hannity and coulter on a 24/7/365 loop on every TV in America.
 
Yes of course. Because we all know rush would never say such things and mean them.

The right wing apologists continue to set the land speed record defending this moron.

Fail indeed.
QUOTE=Top Cat;1061401655]Yes of course. Because we all know rush would never say such things and mean them.

The right wing apologists continue to set the land speed record defending this moron.

Fail indeed.[/QUOTE]

Obama said he believes in redistribution ... did he mean it?
Obama said he can't get single-payer right away so he was going to do ACA (Obamacare) to get there. Did he mean it?

Perhaps those were bad examples because, yes, of course he meant them. But he didn't say them on his own radio show or in a SOTU? Why do you think that is?

But tell me which of these he really meant and which were lies ...
obama 2 face.jpg
 
Quote Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
"....REAL Liberals would have stood up, and said "Hell no" when the President decided to start executing American citizens, WITHOUT ANY FORM OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, based only on his OPINION alone...

REAL Liberals would have stood again, and said NO to putting people into jail without charges indefitely, AGAIN based purely on the President's words alone.......

And Jewish Americans must REALLY be blind after what they've gone through, since many attribute all these terrible things to Republicans, when all ANY President needs now do is label them, or any OTHER group, "terrorists," and they can be imprisoned for life, and executed at will, LEGALLY today, based on the President's assessment alone....."


Hard Truth: "...there was zero evidence that Romney would be better on any of the issues you mentioned and [plenty of evidence that] he would probably be worse..."

Do you still believe that? Seriously?

Maybe in a year or two you'll realize what happened and how the American people blew it.

Provide me with quotes from Romney indicating that if elected he would end the Afghan war sooner, stay out of Pakistan, Yemen, Mali and Somalia, close our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, end renditions, close Guantanamo, give terrorism suspects genuine (non-military) trials, ban all torture, and end the use of drones and other methods of extra-judicial assassination and imprisonment.
 
Last edited:
So, how's that boycott working out?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
"....REAL Liberals would have stood up, and said "Hell no" when the President decided to start executing American citizens, WITHOUT ANY FORM OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, based only on his OPINION alone...

REAL Liberals would have stood again, and said NO to putting people into jail without charges indefitely, AGAIN based purely on the President's words alone.......

And Jewish Americans must REALLY be blind after what they've gone through, since many attribute all these terrible things to Republicans, when all ANY President needs now do is label them, or any OTHER group, "terrorists," and they can be imprisoned for life, and executed at will, LEGALLY today, based on the President's assessment alone....."


Hard Truth: "...there was zero evidence that Romney would be better on any of the issues you mentioned and [plenty of evidence that] he would probably be worse..."



Provide me with quotes from Romney indicating that if elected he would end the Afghan war sooner, stay out of Pakistan, Yemen, Mali and Somalia, close our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, end renditions, close Guantanamo, give terrorism suspects genuine (non-military) trials, ban all torture, and end the use of drones and other methods of extra-judicial assassination and imprisonment.


You'd be far better off if you asked someone who actually agreed with Romney ideologically..........

That wouldn't be me.
 
You'd be far better off if you asked someone who actually agreed with Romney ideologically..........

That wouldn't be me.

Correct. It was Grant that suggested that Romney would be better than Obama on the issues that you listed, so it is up to him to provide evidence.
 
I listen to Limbaugh regularly. He says it in the after noon, by that night it is all over the conservobot forums nad I hear it down at the legion or where ever else I happen to hear people dscussing polotics. Then my family and freinds send me an email about it. Dittoheads are everywhere.
Only Leftists can leap to such ridiculous conclusions. I don't even get Rush Limbaugh where I live. I'm only observing that the usual suspects are still having hissy fits over him and Fox News.
 
Provide me with quotes from Romney indicating that if elected he would end the Afghan war sooner, stay out of Pakistan, Yemen, Mali and Somalia, close our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, end renditions, close Guantanamo, give terrorism suspects genuine (non-military) trials, ban all torture, and end the use of drones and other methods of extra-judicial assassination and imprisonment.

And what would be the point of all of that?
 
On the contrary. I have stated repeatedly that I want Limbaugh, O'reilly, Hannity and coulter on a 24/7/365 loop on every TV in America.

If you're stating this repeatedly then they seem to be having an unhealthy effect on you. Just stay with MSNBC and you'll feel more comfortable.
 
And what would be the point of all of that?

To show that BOTH politicians are just as bad. Oh wait, that would go against your concept of "Left bad, right good" mentality.
 
Yes of course. Because we all know rush would never say such things and mean them.

The right wing apologists continue to set the land speed record defending this moron.

Fail indeed.

If you actually listened to him you would have heard the obvious sarcasm when he said that instead of reading the sound bite and running with it.
 
And what would be the point of all of that?

You claimed I was wrong to say that Romney would have been as bad or worse than Obama on civil liberties/due process issues. Prove it.
 
You claimed I was wrong to say that Romney would have been as bad or worse than Obama on civil liberties/due process issues. Prove it.

I don't believe I commented on civil liberties, which is why I encourage using quotes.

But it is likely that Romney would have provided better protection at Benghazi, told the truth immediately after the attack, and not accused an innocent man of being responsible for the tragedy..
 
I don't believe I commented on civil liberties, which is why I encourage using quotes.

The relevant comments were quoted in post#206.

Thank you for acknowledging that Romney would be as bad or worse than Obama in the areas of civil liberties and due process.
 
The relevant comments were quoted in post#206.

Thank you for acknowledging that Romney would be as bad or worse than Obama in the areas of civil liberties and due process.

You seem to understand how the quote system works yet are compelled to ignore it.

I never did mention civil liberties in post 206 or anywhere else on this thread, nor did I mention due process.
 
Back
Top Bottom