- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,944
- Reaction score
- 69,025
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
you are lying again just like you lied before. its not an argument.
again at the end of the day the tags in the manner they are used do not infringe on freedom or rights and the school has the right to know who is on their property and where. make 50 more posts this fact will not change
This is not a lie. It is as said. Your argument is that "can they go anywhere they want whenever they want? No. Then the response is warranted". There's no restriction there, there's no real fact that doesn't ignore the larger consequence. All of our movements everywhere outside our own personal property (and in many ways, even there) are restricted on some level. You like to ignore that. Which is why I am not lying, and you are being dishonest and presenting little to no fact. Sure a student can't go everywhere (that being the closest thing you have to a fact in your argument and nothing more), but so are the rest of our movements...on public property no less. But you break your argument because you don't want to say we can be forced to have RFID in public or in State or National parks even though your argument makes none of these distinctions. It is an argument of general non-restriction. And that's a fact.