• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence Evangels will never pull their heads out, consequentl can't be reasoned with

spanky

spanky

Banned
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
5,431
Reaction score
979
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
If the GOPe Were Smart They Would Beg Gov. Palin to Come Back Into the Room | A Time For Choosing


If the GOPe Were Smart They Would Beg Gov. Palin to Come Back Into the Room

The answer for the GOP is to clean up its own act and address the real concerns of the majority of Americans, regardless of political affiliation. They can start by not shunning the members of their own party who have the credibility to speak on such matters. Reform in Washington is a winning message and has the potential to bring in voters from nearly every racial, gender, and economic demographic in the country.
Click to expand...

They actually believe this...
 
Re: Evidence Evangels will never pull their heads out, consequentl can't be reasoned

To the OP:

I'd never heard of that term you used in your thread title: Evangels, so I looked it up.

e·van·gel1    [ih-van-juhl] Show IPA
noun
1.
the good tidings of the redemption of the world through Jesus Christ; the gospel.
2.
( usually initial capital letter ) any of the four Gospels.
3.
doctrine taken as a guide or regarded as of prime importance.
4.
good news or tidings.

e·van·gel2    [ih-van-juhl] Show IPA
noun
an evangelist.
Evangels | Define Evangels at Dictionary.com
Click to expand...

spanky, I think I am safe in supposing that you don't mean that a gospel might have its head in its ass so I assume you are talking about actual evangelists. Am I correct?

If so, I would ask you how you can possibly make a connection between evangelists and the article you presented? I didn't see anything in the article that implied a religious underpinning. Perhaps you, somehow, connect all Republicans or conservatives with religion? Does that mean you don't think it's possible that a religious person can be liberal?

I suspect, spanky, that you are falling prey to the same tendency of a lot of liberals...of stereotyping Republicans. If you are, do you feel comfortable doing so?
 
Re: Evidence Evangels will never pull their heads out, consequentl can't be reasoned

spanky said:
If the GOPe Were Smart They Would Beg Gov. Palin to Come Back Into the Room | A Time For Choosing


If the GOPe Were Smart They Would Beg Gov. Palin to Come Back Into the Room



They actually believe this...
Click to expand...

sometimes being civil just isnt possible ;)
anybody that thinks the answer for the GOP since Mitt failed is getting palin back in the front is bat **** insane and a complete political moron.
 
Re: Evidence Evangels will never pull their heads out, consequentl can't be reasoned

Mycroft said:
To the OP:

I'd never heard of that term you used in your thread title: Evangels, so I looked it up.



spanky, I think I am safe in supposing that you don't mean that a gospel might have its head in its ass so I assume you are talking about actual evangelists. Am I correct?

If so, I would ask you how you can possibly make a connection between evangelists and the article you presented? I didn't see anything in the article that implied a religious underpinning. Perhaps you, somehow, connect all Republicans or conservatives with religion? Does that mean you don't think it's possible that a religious person can be liberal?

I suspect, spanky, that you are falling prey to the same tendency of a lot of liberals...of stereotyping Republicans. If you are, do you feel comfortable doing so?
Click to expand...

1. Character limitations in a title forced me to truncate "Evangelicals".

2. The OP is an evangelical and long term Palin supporter due to her religious positions.

3. Don't confuse "conservative" with the right wing religious, they are two different things.

4. I am not a liberal.
 
Re: Evidence Evangels will never pull their heads out, consequentl can't be reasoned

spanky said:
1. Character limitations in a title forced me to truncate "Evangelicals".

2. The OP is an evangelical and long term Palin supporter due to her religious positions.

3. Don't confuse "conservative" with the right wing religious, they are two different things.

4. I am not a liberal.
Click to expand...

1. Fair enough.

2. I guess you'll need to show me. I've done a bit of googling on her and , while she is certainly a Palin supporter, I don't see evidence she is an evangelist.

3. Again...show me.

This description of her doesn't mention evangelism: Welcome Stacy Drake! | A Time For Choosing and none of the posts on the first three pages of her blog, MIGHTY SERF, imply any sort of evangelism. (that's as far back as I scanned) Both sources DO show her as a "conservative/libertarian".

4. I've never said you were a liberal. I said that I suspect you of doing something a lot of liberals do: stereotyping Republicans. You DO understand the meaning of the words I've use?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom