• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Crowd LOLs as Bachmann insists she doesn't talk politics

wolfman24 said:
the problem she admits to being affiliated with them so she is fair game on that count.
Click to expand...
So by that logic we can criticize all Baptist's because of Westminster Baptist correct?
 
wolfman24 said:
What the hell does this have to do with anything????? Apples and moon rocks
Click to expand...

Bachmann says she's a Tea Partier. Most Tea Partiers deny her.
Westminster says they are a Baptist church. Most Baptist churches deny them.
Now, you know what you can do with those apples and moon rocks.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Bachmann says she's a Tea Partier. Most Tea Partiers deny her.
Westminster says they are a Baptist church. Most Baptist churches deny them.
Now, you know what you can do with those apples and moon rocks.
Click to expand...

Still have not answered my question. But oh well
 
wolfman24 said:
Still have not answered my question. But oh well
Click to expand...

You claimed it was fair to link her with the Tea Party because she self affiliates with them. Westminster self affiliates with the Baptist religion. I think most would agree that it would unfair to criticize the entire Baptist religion due to Westminster. I believe this applies to Bachmann/Tea Party as well. See what I'm saying?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom