• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas delegates planning floor mutiny over RNC rules changes

Obama - Ayers? You've got to be kidding me. This is Romney's actual campaign managers.

I think it's been resolved:

A compromise on Republican Party rules will likely prevent a convention floor fight on Tuesday.
Republican National Committeeman James Bopp, who had led a movement to oppose a new delegate rule on the convention floor, confirms to ABC News that he has agreed to a deal on compromise language.
A new RNC rule would have allowed presidential candidates effectively to choose their own bound delegates. States typically determine delegate allotments through primaries, then meet later at state conventions to pick those individuals. Under the new rule, state parties would give up some power to choose, among themselves, who gets to attend future GOP conventions as voting delegates.
Bopp had led a movement to defeat this rule on the convention floor Tuesday.
Instead, Bopp has agreed to compromise language. The RNC Rules Committee will meet Tuesday to approve the replacement language, Bopp told ABC News.
Deal Will Likely Prevent Floor Fight at Republican National Convention - ABC News
 
The new Republican Party rule? Replace delegates that were selected during the primary process and replace them with delegates friendly to Romney? Uh uh. This is not the old Soviet Union. This is America, dammit. I support this floor fight. Yes, even with the proper delegates in place, Romney is still going to be nominated, but these delegates were chosen by the people, and deserve to be seated.

Seat the elected delegates, Comrade Romney.


This floor fight makes me proud to be living in Texas. I'll toast them with a Shiner Bock, and wave the Texas flag in their honor. :)

Article is here.





I would bet this is a teaparty move and not specifically a romny move to have more "Control" over their far right brand of purity ...I agree with your assessment Dan.
 
Did Obama tell Ayers he never should have tried to bomb ****? No? Well then he's just as guilty of domestic terrorism.

See how that works?

Ayers is/was not part of Obama's campaign and one could hardly compare a campaign lawyer to a guy Obama met. Now let's say for a second this was Axel Rodd/Rham and Obama in 2007. Then Yes, Obama would be completely responsible for their actions as they are his employees as well as handlers.
 
I would bet this is a teaparty move and not specifically a romny move to have more "Control" over their far right brand of purity ...I agree with your assessment Dan.

Actually, Tea Partiers are the ones revolting here.
 
The new Republican Party rule? Replace delegates that were selected during the primary process and replace them with delegates friendly to Romney? Uh uh. This is not the old Soviet Union. This is America, dammit. I support this floor fight. Yes, even with the proper delegates in place, Romney is still going to be nominated, but these delegates were chosen by the people, and deserve to be seated.

Seat the elected delegates, Comrade Romney.

This floor fight makes me proud to be living in Texas. I'll toast them with a Shiner Bock, and wave the Texas flag in their honor. :)

Article is here.

Shiner Bock?? I thought you wanted to toast them, not insult them...
 
Back
Top Bottom