- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Pointless. In faithful right-wing knee-jerk fashion, you offered up the right-of-contract as some sort of sacred icon or talisman needing only to be waved to have its effect. As any legal novice would have, you then failed to notice any connection at all between that claim and the disgraced Lochner Era that was in quite significant part based upon it. Everything you've posted since then has been the simple gibberish of a failed cover-up.
More of the idiocy that the poor and middle class are not smart enough to contract properly and the enlightened elite must dictate the terms of the contract for them lest they be taken advantage of. Everything you have posted (I find it hilarious how long it takes you to respond to direct posts towards your psychobabble BTW) demonstrates a sort of welfare socialist noblesse oblige attitude that you are the beneficent savior of those too stupid not to understand the big bad semi capitalist world we live in
YOur silly generalizations of the rich are either a sickening bit of class envy or some even more disturbing bit of self loathing and self flagellation
"disagraced Lochner era" means the FDR statist jurisprudence rejected line of cases that was seen as not statist enough