• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge in Zimmermann Case Discloses Ties to CNN Analyst.....

This is not news. The judge in question was one of four who could have been chosen by the random draw. The CNN analyst is her husband's law partner, who had signed a contract with CNN before the judge was chosen, because the analyst is considered an expert on Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law. All this was revealed by said analyst on CNN last week.

Zimmerman is not being railroaded, and pointing to the gender of the prosecutor and judge is just offensive.
I believe he is. I believe he will not be convicted of second degree murder. The special prosecutor overcharged, assuming he should have been charged. This is all about politics. Specifically it is all about a black president who, if he had a son, would have looked like T.M.
Blacks are being played but it is okay. They want to be played. Anything for the Historic Second Black President (the authentic first black president being Bill Clinton).

Who do black people think of themselves as a tribe instead of individuals?
 
Just moments ago we spoke by phone with Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin," Angela Corey, the special prosecutor investigating the case, said at a news conference in Jacksonville. "Three weeks ago our prosecution team promised those sweet parents we would get answers to all of their questions, no matter where our quest for the truth led us. And it is that search for justice for Trayvon that has brought us to this night.....snip~

Zimmerman charged with second-degree murder in Trayvon Martin shooting | The Lookout - Yahoo! News

"Three weeks ago our prosecution team promised those sweet parents we would get answers to all of their questions, no matter where our quest for the truth led us. And it is that search for justice for Trayvon that has brought us to this night.".....snip~

Right here is enough to take this Special Prosecutor down. Our team Promised those sweet parents. No matter where our quest for the Truth led us. Hows that looking for the appeal already? Regardless if he has the money right now or any attorneys. He can sit his azz right in jail and wait to this goes to appeals. Clear bias by the Special Prosectuors own words.....put out Nation-Wide for all to see.

Even a public defender is going to be able to show clear motivated bias by the Special Prosector who promised the kids sweet parents. That no matter what, even if Zimmermann was innocent. That they would find some truth in their quest.

You do realize that a prosecutors job is to "get" people, to prosecute. Not to be unbiased. Her job is to represent the state AGAINST people.

And its the defenses job to protect the defendant from the prosecutor.

The judge is the only one supposed to be unbiased in a court case.
 
I believe he is. I believe he will not be convicted of second degree murder. The special prosecutor overcharged, assuming he should have been charged. This is all about politics. Specifically it is all about a black president who, if he had a son, would have looked like T.M.
Blacks are being played but it is okay. They want to be played. Anything for the Historic Second Black President (the authentic first black president being Bill Clinton).

Who do black people think of themselves as a tribe instead of individuals?

I find the contents of this post to be reprehensible and repulsive. You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.
 
Zimmerman has an excellent attorney and I expect a plea of NO Contest to save his butt from 15 to 25 in prison.

BTW.. Prosecutors have absolute immunity.

Neighborhood Watch | Hometown Security | USAonWatch® Program - National Sheriffs' Association

All I can say is look at the Duke Lacrosse case. Nifong was overzealous in his prosecution of the players, he crossed certain lines and is now disbarred.
The Duke Lacrosse case was allot like this. Jackson and Sharpton inciting the community demanding justice etc.
 
All I can say is look at the Duke Lacrosse case. Nifong was overzealous in his prosecution of the players, he crossed certain lines and is now disbarred.
The Duke Lacrosse case was allot like this. Jackson and Sharpton inciting the community demanding justice etc.

And some fools are comparing this case to OJ and Casey Anthony..

Sorry can't help you if you don't know the bloody difference.
 
I find the contents of this post to be reprehensible and repulsive. You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.
What do you object to? Over charging? I object to it as well.

Or do you object to the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama injecting himself into this case? I object as well.
Or do you object to blacks being played and wanting to be played? I object as well.

So what do you object to?
 
I find the contents of this post to be reprehensible and repulsive. You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.

That may be. But you have to admit that the race card has been used an aweful lot through out all this. Including Obama saying something when he honestly should have kept his nose out of it. And I think the prosecutor has over charged for this case. I could be convinced that Zimmerman could be guilty of involuntary manslaughter...but murder 2? Sorry but I just do not see it.
 
That may be. But you have to admit that the race card has been used an aweful lot through out all this. Including Obama saying something when he honestly should have kept his nose out of it. And I think the prosecutor has over charged for this case. I could be convinced that Zimmerman could be guilty of involuntary manslaughter...but murder 2? Sorry but I just do not see it.

Read the Florida statutes.. Even charged with Murder 2, he can be convicted of the lesser crime of manslaughter.
 
Anyone else think Zimmermann is being railroaded?

Zimmerman is not being railroaded, and the judge will have to recuse herself; that's why she revealed a tie creating a conflict of interest.
 
What do you object to? Over charging? I object to it as well.

Or do you object to the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama injecting himself into this case? I object as well.
Or do you object to blacks being played and wanting to be played? I object as well.

So what do you object to?

Over 5,000 posts and only 700 "likes"; that says a lot.
 
Read the Florida statutes.. Even charged with Murder 2, he can be convicted of the lesser crime of manslaughter.

Only if manslaughter is a part of the original charges. The defendent can agree to lesser charges via a plea deal...even in the middle of a trial, but beyond that exception once the prosecutor charges someone and those charges are put down on paper then those are the only charges that a person can be convicted on. No one, including the jury, can convict the defendent of anything else.
 
Anyone else think Zimmermann is being railroaded?

All of you need to remember something....a 17 yr old kid is dead...black white orange torquoise or chartruese theres a 17 yr old kid dead...
Now im not prepared to convict zimmerman...I dont have all the information and neither does anyone else....thats what trials are for...to bring out all the facts ..im just going to ignore all the media BS and wait and see the real deal when it comes out.
Just keep in mind one fact that we do KNOW....zimmerman was told to back the hell off the kid by dispatch till the police arrived and he apparently did not do that...that in itself is going to get him convicted of something even if its lesser thant 2nd degree....zimmerman made his own bed being a tard...he is NOT A COP and the kid wasnt committing a crime walking down the street...there will have to be alot more infor that we dont know to come out to have zimmerman exonerated
 
Over 5,000 posts and only 700 "likes"; that says a lot.
A wonderful liberal attitude. Tell you what. You go ahead and kiss all the butts you like so that you will be liked.
I will continue to take liberals to task for their dangerous ideas.
Liberalism is a gutless choice. Your post is evidence of it.
 
This is not news. The judge in question was one of four who could have been chosen by the random draw. The CNN analyst is her husband's law partner, who had signed a contract with CNN before the judge was chosen, because the analyst is considered an expert on Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law. All this was revealed by said analyst on CNN last week.

Zimmerman is not being railroaded, and pointing to the gender of the prosecutor and judge is just offensive.

Well... you are talking to people who habitually refer to blacks as one homogenous group that have been brainwashed. It was only a matter of time before women got attacked simply for being women.
 
All of you need to remember something....a 17 yr old kid is dead...black white orange torquoise or chartruese theres a 17 yr old kid dead...
Now im not prepared to convict zimmerman...I dont have all the information and neither does anyone else....thats what trials are for...to bring out all the facts ..im just going to ignore all the media BS and wait and see the real deal when it comes out.

Not normally. District Attorneys make choices based on their ability to get a conviction. And Grand Juries can be called to review the evidence and make a determination. Except in this case. We have race-baiting by Jackson and Sharpton, along with race-playing and I bet political thuggery and arm twisting by the Administration.

Just keep in mind one fact that we do KNOW....zimmerman was told to back the hell off the kid by dispatch till the police arrived and he apparently did not do that...that in itself is going to get him convicted of something even if its lesser thant 2nd degree....zimmerman made his own bed being a tard...he is NOT A COP and the kid wasnt committing a crime walking down the street...there will have to be alot more infor that we dont know to come out to have zimmerman exonerated
"We don't need you to do that" is hardly the same as, "Back the hell off!" You are overstating your case.
 
zimmerman was told to back the hell off the kid by dispatch till the police arrived and he apparently did not do that

1) Based on the 911 call he did back off. He was running trying to keep line of sight, he stops running, his breath slows down, he says "hes gone, they always get away"
2) "Are you following him?, we don't need you to do that" coming from the dispatcher is not a lawful order(the Sanford Police Department said this themselves). It was a suggestion which as far as we know Zimmerman complied with.

Zimmerman said Martin approached him as he was walking back to his truck and punched him in the face. There is no evidence that refutes this. There is however a witness that states Martin was on top of Zimmerman beating him.
 
All of you need to remember something....a 17 yr old kid is dead...black white orange torquoise or chartruese theres a 17 yr old kid dead...
Now im not prepared to convict zimmerman...I dont have all the information and neither does anyone else....thats what trials are for...to bring out all the facts ..im just going to ignore all the media BS and wait and see the real deal when it comes out.
Just keep in mind one fact that we do KNOW....zimmerman was told to back the hell off the kid by dispatch till the police arrived and he apparently did not do that...that in itself is going to get him convicted of something even if its lesser thant 2nd degree....zimmerman made his own bed being a tard...he is NOT A COP and the kid wasnt committing a crime walking down the street...there will have to be alot more infor that we dont know to come out to have zimmerman exonerated

Bold vs Red: You're not ready to convict? Sorry, don't believe you. The dispatcher did not tell Zimmerman to "back the hell off the kid" or give any other kind of order. The 911 dispatcher suggested that Zimmerman did not have to follow Martin. And as the police have already stated...Zimmerman did not have to obey the 911 dispatcher even if it HAD been an order. So no, that in itself is not going to get Zimmerman convicted of anything.
 
1) Based on the 911 call he did back off. He was running trying to keep line of sight, he stops running, his breath slows down, he says "hes gone, they always get away"
2) "Are you following him?, we don't need you to do that" coming from the dispatcher is not a lawful order(the Sanford Police Department said this themselves). It was a suggestion which as far as we know Zimmerman complied with.

Zimmerman said Martin approached him as he was walking back to his truck and punched him in the face. There is no evidence that refutes this. There is however a witness that states Martin was on top of Zimmerman beating him.

That. Is. Not. What. He. Said.
 
That. Is. Not. What. He. Said.
your right, I paraphrased. I admit its been a few weeks since I listened to the call.

I'm rereading the transcript now.

Zimmerman:

Yeah. You go in straight through the entrance and then you would go left. You go straight in, don’t turn and make a left.

He’s running. [2:08]

Zimmerman:

OK.

These assholes. They always get away.

When you come to the clubhouse, you come straight in and you go left. Actually, you would go past the clubhouse. [1:39]
 
A wonderful liberal attitude. Tell you what. You go ahead and kiss all the butts you like so that you will be liked.
I will continue to take liberals to task for their dangerous ideas.
Liberalism is a gutless choice. Your post is evidence of it.

Your posts aren't based on anything drawn from reality. Your writing is belligerent and rather paranoid actually. You make the claim of "dangerous liberal ideas"; based on what? Your weekends off? Your health care coverage? Your pension? I know - social security! Oh! The very idea that if you get down and out you can receive a meal and get help with a place to live and finding a job - yeah that's dangerous . . .

(chuckle) unbelievable
 
First off.....I don't have a problem getting a grip, but when you can show me what evidence that is new from 3 weeks ago. Then all that ad hom shiznit you throwing might mean something.
Where was the ad hom? Stop crying wolf, will ya?

Why should I provide you evidence that is new from 3 weeks ago? Haven't you had enough of poisoning the potential jury pool by trying this case in cyberspace before it even comes to trial?

Nobody here has all the facts or the forensic evidence. Only the special prosecutor and her investigative team has them all. Also, nobody here can interview witnesses and cross-examine them under oath in trial, so all your outcry to demonize the special prosecutor in favor of letting Zimmerman just walk free is just baseless.

Like I said, let this case works its way through the justice system without you crying wolf or boohoo every single moment the case came up in court for briefing.
 
 
Your posts aren't based on anything drawn from reality. Your writing is belligerent and rather paranoid actually. You make the claim of "dangerous liberal ideas"; based on what? Your weekends off? Your health care coverage? Your pension? I know - social security! Oh! The very idea that if you get down and out you can receive a meal and get help with a place to live and finding a job - yeah that's dangerous . . .

(chuckle) unbelievable

Wow. Just wow. I agree with your final word (chuckle).
 
Where was the ad hom? Stop crying wolf, will ya?

Why should I provide you evidence that is new from 3 weeks ago? Haven't you had enough of poisoning the potential jury pool by trying this case in cyberspace before it even comes to trial?

Nobody here has all the facts or the forensic evidence. Only the special prosecutor and her investigative team has them all. Also, nobody here can interview witnesses and cross-examine them under oath in trial, so all your outcry to demonize the special prosecutor in favor of letting Zimmerman just walk free is just baseless.

Like I said, let this case works its way through the justice system without you crying wolf or boohoo every single moment the case came up in court for briefing.
 

Right.....like ABC TV said, once Zimmermann had an attorney. Theres no one crying wolf. Again the average Criminal Attorney would be all over her publicly made remarks to the press, Nationwide. The Special prosecutor has to release what new evidence there is. I am not trying anything. All I care about is the guy getting a fair trial. Without influences coming from elsewheres. Nor for allowing Race to be used or some polticial gambit by Polticians trying to play with gun laws. Moreover spend some time in Chicago Courts and it is quite understandable where I am coming from. In trusting that system to work out any cogs. Although I am sure many in NY and L.A could Identify as well.
 
Right.....like ABC TV said, once Zimmermann had an attorney. Theres no one crying wolf. Again the average Criminal Attorney would be all over her publicly made remarks to the press, Nationwide. The Special prosecutor has to release what new evidence there is. I am not trying anything. All I care about is the guy getting a fair trial. Without influences coming from elsewheres. Nor for allowing Race to be used or some polticial gambit by Polticians trying to play with gun laws. Moreover spend some time in Chicago Courts and it is quite understandable where I am coming from. In trusting that system to work out any cogs. Although I am sure many in NY and L.A could Identify as well.

The Special Prosecutor has no duty whatsoever to publicly release evidence, new or otherwise. In fact, I'm pretty sure she is ethically bound not to publicly release any evidence before trial. Her only duty is to share the evidence with the Defense Attorney in a timely manner as dictated by law, so I have no idea where you're coming from with the ludicrous statement bolded in your post.
 
Back
Top Bottom