- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
How many times do I have to explain it? If it costs more than it saves, it's idiotic to use it. "Improvement" implies that it eliminates frauds at a larger number than it disenfranchises, and I have explained why this solution doesn't do that many times already.
No need to explain further because no one is being "disenfranchised". Nobody.
That's what's called a "Re Herring".