• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Armed neo-nazis patrolling Sanford

It seems people will stop at nothing to make sure that racism continue to spread like a new vaccine-resistant virus.
 
VanceMack said:
The people that have been stirring up racial hatred for personal gain for the last three weeks. No 'other words' needed. If you are an asshole you are an asshole. Your skin color doesnt change that.
Click to expand...

and you don't think black people would have been pissed about this without them 'agitatas' stirring things up? Really?
 
Hatuey said:
No. Learn to debate. I commented on how this made Zimmerman look. If you took the time to realize the difference between A) offering proof B) making a claim and C) commenting on the matter, you wouldn't look so bad to begin with. The rest of your post? Boring bull**** to duck and hide away from the fact you don't realize the difference between A - B and C. Go troll elsewhere?

Now as far as the actual statement goes - hey, it DOES make Zimmerman look like a racist when the people rushing to his defence are avowed racists and not the pretend kind like Sharpton. You know, not people who have a popularity stake in this but an ideological stake in race debates. :shrug:
Click to expand...

You seem to have forgotten what you posted, when you spin too much you tend to lose track of what you originally said:
Originally Posted by Hatuey
... Nothing says you're not racist like having Neo-Nazi's protecting you
Click to expand...

Backpedaling.jpg

You would look a lot more honest if you just owned your own comments, instead of trying to smart ass and snark your way out of them.
 
joko104 said:
This time the racist Trayvon failed to win in his assault or to murder a Latino.

Possibly if his parents weren't such racists themselves this would not have happened. Neo-naizis weren't protecting Zimmerman when Trayvon decided to beat Zimmerman to death because Trayvon is a racist. It is unfortunate too many African-Americans try to instill race-hartred in the next generation of African-Americans.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Trayvon should have been smart enough to realize that Skittles were not going to be a very effective weapon in his effort to murder a Latino.
 
opportunitycost said:
you seem to have forgotten what you posted, when you spin too much you tend to lose track of what you originally said:
Click to expand...

Dooooo youuuuu knowwwww whaaaat prooof is? You clearly don't. I stated that this made Zimmerman look like a racist. That's not proof of anything. It's a commentary of what it makes him look like. Please learn to debate? The cute pictures make you look foolish when you don't understand the difference A) Claim B) Proof and C) Statement. If I were to lay out why it makes him look like a racist, THAT would be the proof. Actually, know what? Let an adult get on the computer. I'm in no mood to explain the basic, yet key, differences between proof and statement to teenagers with too much access to Imgur.
 
Last edited:
Look you made the claim. I then showed why the claim itself was done in bad faith because it was a fallacy. Then you toss around personal characterizations that are not true. Congratulations you have learned how not to engage in debate while at the same time claiming you are superior at it.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Next personal attack gets removed from the thread.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Look you made the claim.
Click to expand...

Do... you... know what a claim is? Seriously, first you said I provided PROOF. When your ridiculous CLAIM got shot down by what I can only assume was your own little trip to Wikipedia, you changed your story to saying I myself made a claim. Now here is a claim as an example: George Zimmerman is a racist. Can you figure out a way to add PROOF to that sentence? ;)
 
Can everyone stop thinking in terms of race? Is that possible? A kid got shot, not a black kid, just a kid and whether Zimmerman was at fault or not its still tragic. Why be angry if other people want to turn it into an issue of race? Whats it to you, does it really affect you personally? Do you feel that if you say this was a tragic event you personally by virtue of your race will harm you in some way?

Or maybe you'll complain that all the attention goes to black victims because its PC, or think a crime against a white person is being ignored because of his race. Why not be upset that the crime is being ignored, not a crime on a white individual, just a crime on an individual.

Once you cut out the race aspect of it, the important things are easy to see, its not a black kid who got shot, its a kid, its not a crime against a white person, its a crime against a person, etc etc. What you should be angry about is that something bad and unjustified happened to a person, not to "X race" person.
 
Hatuey said:
Do... you... know what a claim is? Seriously, first you said I provided PROOF. When your ridiculous CLAIM got shot down by what I can only assume was your own little trip to Wikipedia, you changed your story to saying I myself made a claim. Now here is a claim as an example: George Zimmerman is a racist. Can you figure out a way to add PROOF to that sentence? ;)
Click to expand...

Lord. You made a claim. I quoted it.

Underlined---STOP IT. Lefthanded compliments are not appreciated.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Lord. You made a claim. I quoted it.
Click to expand...

Really? I thought I provided proof. Which is it? Get your story straight or I'll report you for trolling me.

Underlined---STOP IT. Lefthanded compliments are not appreciated.
Click to expand...

You can now read my mind? I guess you haven't gone to Wikipedia. I suggest you do. It'll explain to you the difference between a A) statement B) claim and C) proof.
 
Aderleth said:
Which is interesting with respect to this case, since Zimmerman is vaguely Hispanic and has a Jewish name.
Click to expand...



He's as "vaguely Hispanic" as our president is "vaguely black". :lol: seriously though the story is stupid, and these boneheads don't represent "white people" any more than the black panthers represent "black people"....

The media is still desparatley making this about race. The real tragedy is that most young black men who get shot, are shot by other black men, yet that is never brought up not only by the media, but never by the community or the race hucksters sharpton et al.
 
This the same group that some Fox News local channel called a "civil rights group"?
 
Wiggen said:
and you don't think black people would have been pissed about this without them 'agitatas' stirring things up? Really?
Click to expand...
Does that change that they have in fact been there stirring things up and causing racial tensions? When this issue first hit most people were upset and wanted a more full investigation...myself included. Most people I know think Zimmerman is responsible due to his overzealous actions and bad decisions. Race didnt even need to enter into the equation...still doesnt. There is no real evidence that the hispanic man shot the black man for racial reasons and whatever 'evidence' we have been shown so far has been proven to have been intentionally tainted by the media to sensationalize the story.
 
Hatuey said:
Really? I thought I provided proof. Which is it? Get your story straight or I'll report you for trolling me.



You can now read my mind? I guess you haven't gone to Wikipedia. I suggest you do. It'll explain to you the difference between a A) statement B) claim and C) proof.
Click to expand...

Really, I thought you provided jack and ****. You get your story straight first. Hit the triangle if you like, you are the one trolling and you are well aware of that.

2nd sentence is more snark, point that sharp criticism at your own posts and see if they stand scrutiny.
 
and you don't think black people would have been pissed about this without them 'agitatas' stirring things up? Really?
Does that change that they have in fact been there stirring things up and causing racial tensions? When this issue first hit most people were upset and wanted a more full investigation...myself included. Most people I know think Zimmerman is responsible due to his overzealous actions and bad decisions. Race didnt even need to enter into the equation...still doesnt. There is no real evidence that the hispanic man shot the black man for racial reasons and whatever 'evidence' we have been shown so far has been proven to have been intentionally tainted by the media to sensationalize the story.
Click to expand...

I actually think most people would never had heard about this without the "agitatas". Lets face it there are far too many people killed for various reasons every year and only a handfull get national media attention. Remember Jon Bennett Ramsey, Unfortunately not the first and not the last child who was/will be killed by some whack job. But for some reason this story became a national sensation. People were going crazy over it. Now I agree that it was a terrible thing and the person/people responsible should be brought to justice but why this story and not the others? Only reason I can think of is the media decided to hype it. Just like this story. Yes it is a terrible tragedy, was race a factor? Some people are very quick to state emphatically YES!. Truth is we do not know and probably never will. What we do know is that a young man is dead. This is a tragedy and THAT has nothing to do with the color of his skin.
 
dontworrybehappy said:
Well, if muslims, blacks, hispanics and jews all have a right to protest armed in the streets, why not these people?
Click to expand...
imho, There is a difference between having a right to do something and that something being a good idea.
ymmv
 
Hatuey said:
Oh no, guilt by association would mean there is no association to begin with. As Neo-Nazis want to actively defend Mr Zimmerman, there is AN EXISTING association. Learn to debate? ;)
Click to expand...

You mean like the Martins are "associated" with the Black Panthers?
 
DrunkenAsparagus said:
I'm not going to say that race is not still a huge issue in this country, but it looks like the people most interested in stirring up **** in this particular case are the media. Whether or not Zimmerman broke the law and acted with reckless or malicious intent when he shot Martin, there is not a whole lot of evidence that he cared about the kid's race all that much. This has not stopped the media from fabricating a certain narrative in order to get more attention. Few topics make Americans more uncomfortable or susceptible to outrage than race, and the media has repeatedly distorted and played up certain things to make Sanford look like 1994 Watts. What happened was a tragedy, but what is needed is an investigation, not attention-whoring off of two people.
Click to expand...
Afaict, the racial issue has been more w/ the SPD than w/ Z.
That's why the Feds are investigating the SPD.
 
Anniegetyourgun said:
Of course the media aren't reporting this....
New Black Panthers: Race War For Trayvon April 9th 'Day of Action'
Click to expand...
Good, they shouldn't.

These losers are just looking for coverage to make their insignificant group seem more meaningful and relevant than it ever will be. That they're stupid and say stupid things isn't really news. There's no good that will come from giving them the spotlight they want.
If you and Breitbart want to be their cheerleaders and promote their agenda by popularizing them, that's you business. But I am all for dnftt on this one.
ymmv
 
Hatuey said:
Oh no, guilt by association would mean there is no association to begin with. As Neo-Nazis want to actively defend Mr Zimmerman, there is AN EXISTING association. Learn to debate? ;)
Click to expand...



Talk about putting your foot in your mouth..... Obama, Bill ayers, unrepentent terrorist..... Obama, reverend wright.....


standby for hautey obfuscation! :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom