• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme court rules for Idaho couple in EPA battle

sawyerloggingon

sawyerloggingon

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
14,697
Reaction score
5,704
Location
Where they have FOX on in bars and restaurants
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This is a huge victory for the rights of Americans. The EPA can no longer be judge jury and executioner. Obamas EPA has been stopped in it's tracks, score one for the little guy. It was a unanimous decision too, even the libs could see the EPA had gone nuts here.

"The Supreme Court today ruled in favor of an Idaho couple who had been battling the Environmental Protection Agency in an effort to build their dream home."




Supreme Court Rules For Idaho Couple In EPA Battle - ABC News
 
It's a start, anyway. We still have a long way to go to bring the EPA under control.
 
bout time someone did something about the epa.
 
Im wondering if this is a tipping point in agency actions, because they have been undertaking these kinds of actions for years.
 
Now THIS case is a prime example of governmental thuggery, if I've ever heard one.

Good job, Supremes...9-0.
 
sawyerloggingon said:
This is a huge victory for the rights of Americans. The EPA can no longer be judge jury and executioner. Obamas EPA has been stopped in it's tracks, score one for the little guy. It was a unanimous decision too, even the libs could see the EPA had gone nuts here.

"The Supreme Court today ruled in favor of an Idaho couple who had been battling the Environmental Protection Agency in an effort to build their dream home."




Supreme Court Rules For Idaho Couple In EPA Battle - ABC News
Click to expand...


Read the article. This really frosted me: "The Sacketts sought to challenge the EPA’s finding in court, but were told that that they needed to go through a permitting process first, and only after the EPA moved to enforce the order could they seek judicial review."

Good job on the part of the high court.
 
Wow, the left must agree with this. I'm glad to finally see this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom