- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 91,930
- Reaction score
- 90,870
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
[url]http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/jan/11/nuclear-atomic-scientists-doomsday-clock
[/URL]happy Wednesday, everyone.
Two bombs were used in combat 66 years ago with thousands more built since; none used in combat. How do they determine whether we are close to destruction or not?
They come up with things to appear relevant, and grave, and wise. Nothing they've ever done with "the clock" has had any impact on anything, so they exist, pretty much, to impress themselves.
"The challenges to rid the world of nuclear weapons, harness nuclear power, and meet the nearly inexorable climate disruptions from global warming are complex and interconnected. In the face of such complex problems, it is difficult to see where the capacity lies to address these challenges.”
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060111214 said:So now nuclear power-weapons are interconnected with global warming?
The clock is dumb. They did nothing with it during the Cuban Missile Crisis which is probably the closest we came to global destruction since the first atomic bomb was tested.
Nuclear energy is the long term solution to global warming, but allowing nuclear power to spread increases the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. So, yeah, they're very much tied together.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060111299 said:Did you read all of my post or just this part?
That's true, although in fairness, that whole incident was only two weeks long. They usually just update the clock like every 4 years or so. It isn't meant to be an up to the second kind of thing, so it doesn't reflect short term jumps in the risk like that. But yeah, having said that, that does make it less useful.
Yeah, I just responded to the issue you brought up that I thought was interesting. The rest I don't buy and don't really find interesting.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060112187 said:You don't buy it?
I can't believe anyone still pays any attention to those guys.
A decade or two ago it was a big laugh. Now the doomsday clock is a big yawn. The perpetrators of this farce know less about the future than my dog.
The clock is dumb. They did nothing with it during the Cuban Missile Crisis which is probably the closest we came to global destruction since the first atomic bomb was tested.
Add on the fact that they're now including "climate change" as a factor to move the clock.
You mean there are still people that still believe in the climate change hoax ??
A decade or two ago it was a big laugh. Now the doomsday clock is a big yawn. The perpetrators of this farce know less about the future than my dog.
Hope not, the climate has been changing since the atmoshpere formed on this planet. Anywho, the Doomsday Clock represent how close we are to "imminent destruction." Only the AGW retards and goose-stepping activists think it will bring imminent destruction. Any rational AGW supporter would NEVER claim it's bringing on imminent destruction.
Yeah, why we do we listen to panels of scientists. ****ing liberals. Are you just being dense on purpose or do you really not understand what is going on?
You're funny thinking that it has anything to do with the future instead of:
"the measure of how capable mankind is of imploding on itself".
Hope not, the climate has been changing since the atmoshpere formed on this planet. Anywho, the Doomsday Clock represent how close we are to "imminent destruction." Only the AGW retards and goose-stepping activists think it will bring imminent destruction. Any rational AGW supporter would NEVER claim it's bringing on imminent destruction.