- Joined
- Dec 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,248
- Reaction score
- 2,439
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
When do we do that?No different than Libbos criticize Conservatives by bringing up events that happene 150 years ago.
When do we do that?No different than Libbos criticize Conservatives by bringing up events that happene 150 years ago.
No, he was a liberal.Father Coughlin was an anti-Semitic bastard. He was also a Conservative.
see? I can play the game too.
When do we do that?
no, they didn't switch for reasons of racism.
they switched because they hated Johnson & the Democrats for pushing through legislation that protected the votings rights & civil rights of tens of millions of black Southerners, and for not allowing States decide for themselves that second-class citizenship for black people was okee-dokee.
but this had nothing to do with racism. it was about States' Rights, liberty, & freedom!!!!!
No, he was a liberal.
No sides are free from hate - face it. Jack London was racist. So is Rush Limbaugh. Both sides need to be mature enough to recognize racism where it exists and to separate themselves from it.
I don't support taking evidence from a century and a half ago and using it for political gain. However, people today do claim that the Civil War was about states rights, so it is still relevant today.In this very thread, as a matter of fact.
I don't support taking evidence from a century and a half ago and using it for political gain. However, people today do claim that the Civil War was about states rights, so it is still relevant today.
The first step is to recognize real racism vice faux racism.
The point is, some Libbos use the Civil War to prove that Conservatives are racists and how evil white Southerners are.
The Nazis had the support of prominant French politicians, too. Were those Frenchmen any less responsible for the Holocaust? There were also Fins, Danes, Norwegians and Dutchmen who supported the Nazis. Are they excused, too?
Could you please provide the support which proves this charge?
Sanger had the support of prominent African American leaders and those in the medical community at that time. Your charge is ridiculous.
And you have yet to provide anything on the charge against DuBois other than your own fallacious circular reasoning which fails miserably outside of other verifiable evidence.
...Despite the U.S. Constitution, and the 14th Amendment...
exactly!!!
Conservatives whine about faux racism while Liberals complain about real racism.
then why do liberals support affirmative action which is real racism
then why do liberals only whine about "white racism" not black racism
why is white racism in quotes? are you saying it does not exist?
My good Thunder... of course it does not exist. Don't you realize that slavery ended in 1865 and its been all sunshine, roses and lollipops since that time? And puppy dogs... I forgot puppy dogs.... puppy dogs licking yoru face as the strawberry ice cream served up by smiling "others" singings Sweet Low Sweet Chariot as they happily serve it to you.
God Bless America free from prejudice and racism. :2wave:
Moderator's Warning: |
Personal attacks and off-topic discussion will result in thread bans and infractions being handed out. |
Woodrow Wilson was a racist and a Leftist Democrat. FDR--another Leftist Democrat--opened America's concentration camps.
This is a game you will lose.
There is nothing Leftists about the internment camps. There is nothing leftists about being racists.
That is faulty logic and is similar to a lot of "Liberal Fascisms" logic.
I can see why you think Goldberg proved his point if those type of arguments are valid to you!
then why do liberals support affirmative action which is real racism
then why do liberals only whine about "white racism" not black racism
I haven't seen any conservatives in congress trying to get rid of affirmitive actions. Seems they support it as well.
Racism is racism whether it is blacks or whites doing it. There is no such thing as black racism or white racism. All racism is wrong whether it is a black guy calling a white guy "cracker" or if it is a white guy calling a black guy "ni**er".
Since it should be obvious that racism is racism, it should also be obvious that taking someone's race( even though I don't believe in the term ) into account for any reason( affirmative action ) is also racism.
Politics IS ideology.
I agree with you. However, racism was soo rampant at one time against minorities that affirmitive action was necessary to combat it.
While there is still some racism out there though, I don't think it is rampant enough to justify having affirmitive action. I believe that affirmitive action should go away as well.
wrong. AA was created to deal with existing discrimination against minorities and to address the lasting-results of it.
I believe, these results still exist. However, I believe AA should take socio-economic status into account, as all blacks & Hispanics are NOT the same.
How about just get rid of the racial aspect altogether? There are poor whites too. Just have AA for poor people, of whatever race.