• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama threatened, called 'monkey' by ex-Carson council candidate

Yeah, I just made those up.

How about post #334?

.
.
.
.
.
.

oops, there it is...

You posted someone's opinion, not an actual historical source that proves Goldberg wrong.
 
You must not have read all my posts, because I've posted several facts.

Oh I have read more than enough. I'm still laughing too. Thanks for the kicks and giggles.
 
She's a hero of the Left...go figger!

Since you brought it up, please post evidence that most Conservatives agree with genocide. Thaaaaaaanks!!

You do know genocide is forcibly wiping out a population. She never once supported abortion for a woman who didn't choose to have one on her own. This is why words matter.

Genocide means something.

Progressivsim means something.

Liberalism means something.
 
You do know genocide is forcibly wiping out a population. She never once supported abortion for a woman who didn't choose to have one on her own. This is why words matter.

Genocide means something.

Progressivsim means something.

Liberalism means something.

Nevermind that she said she wanted to exterminate the black race. Right? She musta mis-spoke. :rofl
 
No hisotrical source is needed when someone's argument is based on faulty logic.

Actually, it is. :rofl

Goldberg isn't wrong, just because you say so. It's up to you to prove it.
 
when did she say that?

evidence please.

No sweat.

Sanger wanted the Negro Project to include black ministers in leadership roles, but other supervisors did not. To emphasize the benefits of involving black community leaders, she wrote to Gamble "we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another little bonus for you.

page42_blog_entry228_summary_1.jpg
 
Another little bonus for you.

You do know she believed anybody regardless of economic class...beleifs...or race were entitled to clinical care. Yes she spoke to women in the KKK....just like she built clinics in black neighborhoods in a time period of rampant racism.
 
You do know she believed anybody regardless of economic class...beleifs...or race were entitled to clinical care. Yes she spoke to women in the KKK....just like she built clinics in black neighborhoods in a time period of rampant racism.

Feel free to post something supporting that comment.

I find it incredible and very telling that anyone is actually defending Margaret Sanger.
 
this from the wikipedia entry on Margaret Sanger

Race


W. E. B. Du Bois served on the board of Sanger's Harlem clinic.[81]
Sanger believed that lighter-skinned races were superior to darker-skinned races, but would not tolerate bigotry among her staff, nor any refusal to work within interracial projects.[82] Although Sanger's views on race appear archaic from a modern viewpoint, her contemporaries in the African-American community supported her efforts. In 1929, James H. Hubert, a black social worker and leader of New York's Urban League, asked Sanger to open a clinic in Harlem.[83] Sanger secured funding from the Julius Rosenwald Fund and opened the clinic, staffed with African-American doctors, in 1930. The clinic was directed by a 15-member advisory board consisting of African-American doctors, nurses, clergy, journalists, and social workers. The clinic was publicized in the African-American press and African-American churches, and received the approval of W. E. B. Du Bois, founder of the NAACP.[84] Sanger's work with minorities earned praise from Martin Luther King, Jr., in his 1966 acceptance speech for the Margaret Sanger award.[85]
From 1939 to 1942 Sanger was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role – alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble – in the Negro Project, an effort to deliver birth control to poor African Americans.[86] Sanger wanted the Negro Project to include black ministers in leadership roles, but other supervisors did not. To emphasize the benefits of involving black community leaders, she wrote to Gamble "we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." This quote has been used by numerous Sanger detractors, including Angela Davis and the pro-life movement, to support their claims that Sanger was racist.[87] However, according to New York University's Margaret Sanger Papers Project, Sanger, in writing that letter, "recognized that elements within the black community might mistakenly associate the Negro Project with racist sterilization campaigns in the Jim Crow South, unless clergy and other community leaders spread the word that the Project had a humanitarian aim."[88]
 
No it's not...there's no reason for me to disprove something not proven.

Goldberg supported everything he said. The only way to disprove him, is to provide historical docs that do so.
 
Feel free to post something supporting that comment.

I find it incredible and very telling that anyone is actually defending Margaret Sanger.

Honestly, I don't give a **** about Marge Sanger.

She does not represent modern-day Liberalism or Liberals. She is a red-herring for Conservatives who have to go back 45 years to find someone to attack, rather than take on current Liberal-Progressive policies and current Liberal-Progressive leaders.

its pathetic, dishonest, & shows the true ignorance of attacks against us.
 
this from the wikipedia entry on Margaret Sanger

No matter how many times you repost what I've already posted, it doesn't change the fact that Margaret Sanger was trying to exterminate blacks.
 
Honestly, I don't give a **** about Marge Sanger.

She does not represent modern-day Liberalism or Liberals. She is a red-herring for Conservatives who have to go back 45 years to find someone to attack, rather than take on current Liberal-Progressive policies and current Liberal-Progressive leaders.

its pathetic, dishonest, & shows the true ignorance of attacks against us.

Victimization, now? :lamo
 
No matter how many times you repost what I've already posted, it doesn't change the fact that Margaret Sanger was trying to exterminate blacks.

so what.

Jesus Christ believed in helping the poor and healing the sick, hence he was a Liberal.
 
No matter how many times you repost what I've already posted, it doesn't change the fact that Margaret Sanger was trying to exterminate blacks.

Do you think that national African American leader W E B DuBois knew what you supposedly know?
 
Last edited:
Do you think that national African American W E B DuBois knew what you supposedly know?

He was helping with the genocide. He was a sell out to his race. He was a black Pierre Laval.
 
He was helping with the genocide. He was a sell out to his race. He was a black Pierre Laval.

Please present your verifiable evidence on this charge.
 
Please present your verifiable evidence on this charge.

I've already proven that the Negro Project was an attempt to exterminate the black population. WEB Dubois' involvement is pretty much self explanatory after that. He knew what was going on and he knew why it was going on.
 
Back
Top Bottom