Agreed. There's no evidence at all that they got them through devious means, and suggesting such is rather stupid.
Indeed, seemingly in a way that I personally think is ridiculous dickish and completely tactless. They're using one display specifically to target and negatively mock a singular modern religion, seeking to use a negative assertion of someone elses belief to push their own belief rather than a positive assertion of their own thoughts (something I think in a public venue is dickish to do, whether its a Christian telling anothe religion they're going to burn in hell or they follow a false god or athiests going after Christians and mocking their belief). They're using a double digit number of displays to do absolutely nothing, essentially squatting on them so they aren't used by others...again, something I find incredibly dickish and akin to the ridiculous "IF I can't have [x], NO ONE CAN!" childish mentality.
Well, I don't really care what WWJD, perhaps ask that question to someone whose devoutly Christian and it'd matter.
As to the people in the OP, I can understand being upset. This is trivial on a national stage. I can understand as a local issue being rather annoyed by this, especially with it being a seemingly long standing tradition in the town that those displays held Christmas decorations, leading to the possability that it may've been tradition for some of those complaining to traverse the park during the holiday season with family. These local things become trivialized on a national scene, but I disagree with the notion of them being necessarily trivial on a local level.
As to trivial for us to be discussing? Well yes. But a **** TON of stuff we talk about on this forum is trivial. That's nothing new. A **** ton of what gets complained about on here is rather trivial as well. Arguing about the trivial, to a point, is part of why boards like these manage to exist for a decent bit of time. However, for many, it seems this thread has transitioned from just talking about the OP to this strange standing of ground on peoples opinion about the action being taken in a very generalized sense.
You are suggesting it if you're suggesting that somehow the "nothing" being displayed in their boxes is a representation of athiest views.