• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sperm-donor kept wife in the dark

So what is true about Bill Johnson

  • He is a hypocrite

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • He wants to do penance for being wrong

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • He likes money

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • He wants to foist unsuspecting Bill Johnsons on the gay community

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • He loves to screw people, but he hates having sex

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • He wants to create more Republicans in secret

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • He is gay curious

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • He is a mad scientist conducting an experiment

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • He wants to have lots of paternity lawsuits against him

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
A conservative Christian politician has a secret life as a sperm donor for lesbian couples - even though he has campaigned against gay marriage.

Ever wonder what happened to Bill Johnson, after being defeated when he ran for governor of Alabama on an anti-gay platform? He has been donating sperm to lesbian couples. One of the following has to be true:

1) Bill Johnson is just another family values hypocrite.

OR

2) Bill Johnson has realized the errors of his ways, is truly sorry for bashing gays, and is now doing penance.

OR

3) Bill Johnson is making money from this, so screw the morals he preaches to everybody.

Which one is he? Answer the poll. It is multiple choice. :mrgreen:

Article is here.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea who he is... but maybe he doesn't have a problem with gays, just with them getting married?
 
Ever wonder what happened to Bill Johnson, after being defeated when he ran for governor of Alabama on an anti-gay platform? He has been donating sperm to lesbian couples. One of the following has to be true:

1) Bill Johnson is just another family values hypocrite.

OR

2) Bill Johnson has realized the errors of his ways, is truly sorry for bashing gays, and is now doing penance.

OR

3) Bill Johnson is making money from this, so screw the morals he preaches to everybody.

Which one is he? Answer the poll. It is multiple choice. :mrgreen:

Article is here.

4. that homophobe is quite proud of himself and likes the idea of spreading his seed to replicate part of himself
 
I have no idea who he is... but maybe he doesn't have a problem with gays, just with them getting married?

Note...if you have a problem with gays getting married then you have a problem with gays.
 
4. that homophobe is quite proud of himself and likes the idea of spreading his seed to replicate part of himself

Ding...Ding...Ding...give the man a cigar. This is seems purely and ego trip.
 
He brings an entire new perspective to johnsons in general.
 
Ever wonder what happened to Bill Johnson, after being defeated when he ran for governor of Alabama on an anti-gay platform? He has been donating sperm to lesbian couples. One of the following has to be true:

1) Bill Johnson is just another family values hypocrite.

OR

2) Bill Johnson has realized the errors of his ways, is truly sorry for bashing gays, and is now doing penance.

OR

3) Bill Johnson is making money from this, so screw the morals he preaches to everybody.

Which one is he? Answer the poll. It is multiple choice. :mrgreen:

Article is here.

Three. He, like many other men, like to jerk off and make some money while doing it.
 
He probably doesn't really think of the sperm bank as a lesbian couple helper... thats not the only people who use a sperm bank, i don't think they are even the majority. He probably didn't care to think about it too hard.
 
Three. He, like many other men, like to jerk off and make some money while doing it.

I don't know about you but I do it for free. :/ You whore.
 
From the article:

He said he did not know the "relationship status" of the women he donated to: "I just know they want to have children." Asked if it mattered, he said: "I'm not going to answer that question."

My belief is that he didn't know or didn't care enough to find out if he was donating sperm to lesbian couples.
 
Ever wonder what happened to Bill Johnson, after being defeated when he ran for governor of Alabama on an anti-gay platform? He has been donating sperm to lesbian couples. One of the following has to be true:

1) Bill Johnson is just another family values hypocrite.

OR

2) Bill Johnson has realized the errors of his ways, is truly sorry for bashing gays, and is now doing penance.

OR

3) Bill Johnson is making money from this, so screw the morals he preaches to everybody.

Which one is he? Answer the poll. It is multiple choice. :mrgreen:

Article is here.

Don't care. His private life is just that, his private life.

When are people going to start ignoring a persons private life?
 
Don't care. His private life is just that, his private life.

When are people going to start ignoring a persons private life?

Probably around the same time they stop using their position to either comment on or impact the private lives of others.
 
Probably around the same time they stop using their position to either comment on or impact the private lives of others.

What position does this guy have? He is no longer on the City Council that he was once on. He did not get elected to govenor when he ran. Right now, this guy has no position.

Besides, even a politician deserves to have a private life free from nosey people.
 
What position does this guy have? He is no longer on the City Council that he was once on. He did not get elected to govenor when he ran. Right now, this guy has no position.

Right, but he did previously, and he did so use it.

Besides, even a politician deserves to have a private life free from nosey people.

As far as I'm concerned, politicians are welcome to private lives when they let the private lives of others alone. You reap what you sow.
 
Right, but he did previously, and he did so use it.

Yeah, over a year ago. So how long must a politician be out of the loop before thier private life actually becomes private? Everything that this guy has done was within the last year. Hell, the three women that got pregnant by him are still pregnant.

As far as I'm concerned, politicians are welcome to private lives when they let the private lives of others alone. You reap what you sow.

This guy has done that for over a year now. Apparently you don't practice what you preach?

Also I'll need to remember your blatant disregard for a persons private life the next time a TSA thread comes up.
 
Yeah, over a year ago. So how long must a politician be out of the loop before thier private life actually becomes private? Everything that this guy has done was within the last year. Hell, the three women that got pregnant by him are still pregnant.

When you get right down to it, for the most part this guy's private life is private. This came out because some people think it flew in the face of what he preached in public. If he'd gotten a speeding ticket or his kid got expelled from school I doubt we would've heard about it.

As for how long, I really don't know. It's more a function of the fact that politicians in general keep trying to legislate morality. If they were to knock it off in general, then in general we'd stop sniggering at the personal embarrassments of politicians (former or current). If this guy hadn't done it, then this thread wouldn't exist.

This isn't any different from an especially stupid criminal getting a mention on the news -- the politician in question hasn't been getting followed around since he left office, his every exploit has not been a matter of record. He got caught in one embarrassing thing that seems to contradict his formerly public positions, and that's why it's being reported on.

Also I'll need to remember your blatant disregard for a persons private life the next time a TSA thread comes up.

Right, because sniggering at this is exactly the same as TSA's invasiveness. Hyperbole, much?
 
When you get right down to it, for the most part this guy's private life is private. This came out because some people think it flew in the face of what he preached in public. If he'd gotten a speeding ticket or his kid got expelled from school I doubt we would've heard about it.

As for how long, I really don't know. It's more a function of the fact that politicians in general keep trying to legislate morality. If they were to knock it off in general, then in general we'd stop sniggering at the personal embarrassments of politicians (former or current). If this guy hadn't done it, then this thread wouldn't exist.

This isn't any different from an especially stupid criminal getting a mention on the news -- the politician in question hasn't been getting followed around since he left office, his every exploit has not been a matter of record. He got caught in one embarrassing thing that seems to contradict his formerly public positions, and that's why it's being reported on.

The very fact that this is being talked about shows that his privacy is still not his own. And your comments in this thread support this invasion of privacy.

Right, because sniggering at this is exactly the same as TSA's invasiveness. Hyperbole, much?

Not hyperbole. Privacy is privacy. Whether someone is at the airport getting a pat down or some guy giving lesbians his sperm.
 
The very fact that this is being talked about shows that his privacy is still not his own. And your comments in this thread support this invasion of privacy.



Not hyperbole. Privacy is privacy. Whether someone is at the airport getting a pat down or some guy giving lesbians his sperm.

There is a huge difference with the straw man you just posted. People aren't asking for pat downs at airports. Those pat downs are being forced on them. Also, those pat downs do not correspond whatsoever with ANY behavior on the part of those who are being patted down that would make them deserve it. On the other hand, Johnson chose to be a hypocrite, and did have an anti-gay agenda, so his hypocrisy is certainly the issue here.
 
There is a huge difference with the straw man you just posted. People aren't asking for pat downs at airports. Those pat downs are being forced on them. Also, those pat downs do not correspond whatsoever with ANY behavior on the part of those who are being patted down that would make them deserve it. On the other hand, Johnson chose to be a hypocrite, and did have an anti-gay agenda, so his hypocrisy is certainly the issue here.

Privacy is privacy. Trying to say that violating ones privacy in one area is OK while saying it is wrong in another is the hypocritical part. Johnson did not ask for his privacy on this subject to be violated either.
 
Privacy is privacy. Trying to say that violating ones privacy in one area is OK while saying it is wrong in another is the hypocritical part. Johnson did not ask for his privacy on this subject to be violated either.

Yes he did, by being a public figure who engaged in gay bashing. When you are a public figure, you are open to your own hypocrisy. This goes for the Johnsons of the world, as well as the Clintons.
 
Yes he did, by being a public figure who engaged in gay bashing. When you are a public figure, you are open to your own hypocrisy. This goes for the Johnsons of the world, as well as the Clintons.

Johnson has not been a public figure for over a year. This has already been explained.
 
Note...if you have a problem with gays getting married then you have a problem with gays.

This is actrually a common misconception. While I personally have no problem with gay marriage I CAN see the reason why people argue they shouldnt be allowed to be married. From the perspective of the church (which keep in mind is the one that DOEs the marriage) marriage is between a man and a woman and being gay is wrong. With this in mind why should they be forced to contradict their own religious beliefs just because a couple wants the official title? In Truth I think this matter should be left out of the government entirely and left to the churches to decided whether or not to allow a person to marry. IMO we should just give them a seperate title like a civil union with the same rights and benefits as marriage. this oculd be done in an effort to make both groups happy.
 
Johnson has not been a public figure for over a year. This has already been explained.

Doesn't matter. His gay bashing as a public figure is still a matter of public record.
 
Doesn't matter. His gay bashing as a public figure is still a matter of public record.

Hypocrisy noted. What he did was done after he was a public figure. Therefore bringing it up is an invasion of privacy.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom