• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Just Plain Wrong

What's funny is watching you try out for "Dancing with the Stars". :lol:



You CLAIMED homosexuality as abnormal and unnatural, but did not define what abnormal/normal or unnatural/natural is. And every time you have been confronted on this, you've done nothing but scream and complain like a victim. Look, we KNOW your position has no merit and we understand that you do not want that proven to you. Just admit that and everything will be fine.

Nope wrong again..sheesh are you ever right ? do you ever even try to debate instead of making false claims and switching peoples meanings and being dishonest....you seem to need alot of moral support you cant seem to stand on your own...you always have to use the" WE" thing...its always the " WE" thingy like it adds strength to your non debating skills LOLOLOL...it doesnt, "WE" doesnt intimidate me nor add any facts or truth to anything you say..."I" just me will stand on my own two feet...You dont need any moral support when your truthful and right..:)
 
Here ya go...read this again...then please explain it to your parrot

Everyone reading this thread now knows Captain Courtesy is a non debater....his debating skills are dodging questions and asking questions repetitively so as not to expose his weak position by not answering all the while telling us hes an expert in everything he discuss's...lol....
Im done playing the game for now CC...get together with a few of your flock and feed them what to say in the next thread..LOL....this gets funnier all the time...
Um, and you're not?

You asked whether homosexuality was normal/natural. CC asked what you meant statistically. Normal isn't an abstract term.

The final determination of this thread is ..I answered your question and defined homosexuality as abnormal and unnatural and you couldnt even find the gumption to attempt to answer a question in response...Define how homosexuality is normal....pretty pathetic but typical and to be expected... Nothing personal...Im just tuned in to your tactics now...
Link to an answer please.


And then answer this. Does normality define whether something is good or bad? There are plenty of abnormal things that are good, and plenty normal things that are bad.
 
Last edited:
When your ready to attempt to answer the question...let me know CC...

DEFINE HOW HOMOSEXUALITY IS NORMAL and NATURAL....:)
 
Um, and you're not?

You asked whether homosexuality was normal/natural. CC asked what you meant statistically. Normal isn't an abstract term.


Link to an answer please.

Madlib go back and take more CC class's you didnt learn his non debating always dodge and be dishonest skills well enough...

Oh and I will not allow a whole group of Cheerleaders for the homosexual community to jump me in threads anymore, thats fundamentally your MO to overwhelm anyone that disagrees.....I will just ignore most of you pilers...
 
Nope wrong again..sheesh are you ever right ? do you ever even try to debate instead of making false claims and switching peoples meanings and being dishonest....you seem to need alot of moral support you cant seem to stand on your own...you always have to use the" WE" thing...its always the " WE" thingy like it adds strength to your non debating skills LOLOLOL...it doesnt, "WE" doesnt intimidate me nor add any facts or truth to anything you say..."I" just me will stand on my own two feet...You dont need any moral support when your truthful and right..:)

Can you please stop playing these games and define normal and abnormal, you know since your whole argument is hanging on that.
 
CC...nice try at getting me riled....you should know I really am having fun with this..one of your main tactics has failed..:( im sorry for you..grin
 
Madlib go back and take more CC class's you didnt learn his non debating always dodge and be dishonest skills well enough...

Oh and I will not allow a whole group of Cheerleaders for the homosexual community to jump me in threads anymore, thats fundamentally your MO to overwhelm anyone that disagrees.....I will just ignore most of you pilers...
You said you answered the question. If you did it should not be an issue to show us your answer. Be an adult, stop flaming and give us a link to your answer.
 
Nope wrong again..sheesh are you ever right ? do you ever even try to debate instead of making false claims and switching peoples meanings and being dishonest....you seem to need alot of moral support you cant seem to stand on your own...you always have to use the" WE" thing...its always the " WE" thingy like it adds strength to your non debating skills LOLOLOL...it doesnt, "WE" doesnt intimidate me nor add any facts or truth to anything you say..."I" just me will stand on my own two feet...You dont need any moral support when your truthful and right..:)

You don't seem to know the difference between "claim" and "define". Claim is what you did... make a statement without any definitive evidence. Define is what I'm asking you to do, which you have refused... all except once when you refuted your own definition.

And "we" is an accurate term. Several folks have asked you to define your term... and you have refused. Therefore "we" see the weakness in your position.

I know you like playing the victim, lpast, but if you are going to debate a topic, be prepared to have your position questioned. You seemingly don't like that. Too bad.

Define normal.
 
CC...nice try at getting me riled....you should know I really am having fun with this..one of your main tactics has failed..:( im sorry for you..grin

I'm not trying to get you riled. You already ARE riled. It's pretty obvious.

So, tell us... do you still want to use the statistical definition... the one that you refuted, earlier, or do you have a new one for us?
 
Proves nothing ...as usual another dodge..Penquin behavior does not make Human homosexuality normal or natural...unless of course you consider homosexuals penquins

See? This I agree with have said so in this very thread. Homosexual behavior in other species does not have any bearing on the normalcy of homosexuality in humans.

But tell us, lpast... based on the above link, would you say that homosexuality is normal on other animals? Oh, wait... you'd STILL have to define normal to respond to this.
 
Proves nothing ...as usual another dodge..Penquin behavior does not make Human homosexuality normal or natural...unless of course you consider homosexuals penquins
Isn't occurring in nature by definition natural? And if you follow science, you'll know that humans are descended from animals.
 
See? This I agree with have said so in this very thread. Homosexual behavior in other species does not have any bearing on the normalcy of homosexuality in humans.
Animals and humans both have genes. The only difference is intelligence. This itself is a topic for another thread, but if you think evolution is true then homosexuality in animals relates to homosexuality in humans.
 
Isn't occurring in nature by definition natural? And if you follow science, you'll know that humans are descended from animals.

Other animals do not define what is natural in humans, but of course homosexuality occurs in humans without the aid of any technology so all you have to do to prove that it is natural in humans is point to any gay person
 
Other animals do not define what is natural in humans, but of course homosexuality occurs in humans without the aid of any technology so all you have to do to prove that it is natural in humans is point to any gay person
They do. Homosexual behavior in animals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apes are our closest living relatives. It wouldn't be a great leap to assume that the genes of our simian ancestors could have caused homosexuality in humans.
 
They do. Homosexual behavior in animals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apes are our closest living relatives. It wouldn't be a great leap to assume that the genes of our simian ancestors could have caused homosexuality in humans.

I wasn't denying that they don't engage in homosexuality, I'm just saying that has no relevance on whether or not it is natural in humans. But like I said, homosexuality in humans occurs, in nature, so the only evidence we need to prove it is natural is well me :lol:
 
I wasn't denying that they don't engage in homosexuality, I'm just saying that has no relevance on whether or not it is natural in humans.
Why not? Humans are animal too, aren't they?
 
Other animals do not define what is natural in humans, but of course homosexuality occurs in humans without the aid of any technology so all you have to do to prove that it is natural in humans is point to any gay person


ROFLMAO...so to prove cannibalism is natural all you have to do is point to a jeffrey dahmer and raping and murdering women is natural all you have to do is point any serial killer like Ted Bundy.....so using your comparison...anything anyone does is natural if you can point to someone else who does it...
 
Why not? Humans are animal too, aren't they?

All introducing animals into the discussion does is introduce another point to be squabbled over and complicate things. Many people will vociferously deny humans are animals, and will also do the same with evolution. This denial typically correlates with religious beliefs.. guess what other topic up for debate has a strong correlation towards religiosity?
 
ROFLMAO...so to prove cannibalism is natural all you have to do is point to a jeffrey dahmer and raping and murdering women is natural all you have to do is point any serial killer like Ted Bundy.....so using your comparison...anything anyone does is natural if you can point to someone else who does it...

Natural is anything that occurs in nature without the aid of technology. Surgery isn't natural, neither is this conversation since we are using the internet, but both of those things are good.

So please give us your definition of natural.
 
Back
Top Bottom