• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Just Plain Wrong

None of which really stated whether or not you think oral sex or anal sex when engaged upon by heterosexuals are "unnatural sex acts".

And I understand your point. YOU think its a perversion, they're not keeping it locked away like a deep dark secret, and thus society must deal with the fact some people are like this and you dislike it because some of them are really over the top. Well you know what, I think people proclaiming the will of god in regards to his "hate" is immoral. I think that people proclaiming tha god condoned 9/11 is immoral. I think people slandering our troops is immoral. Those are the "extreme" example of the people on YOUR side of this debate...does that mean we shouldn't take your arguments seriously because the extreme portion of your side is showing their immorality for all the world to see?
Wow___I'm a monster___Thank you for reminding me what a terrible person I am.

You forgot to mention that I mistreat puppies, abuse kittens and steal food from babies.
 
Wow___I'm a monster___Thank you for reminding me what a terrible person I am.

You forgot to mention that I mistreat puppies, abuse kittens and steal food from babies.

Don't forget your have a perverted sense of spelling.
 
Wow___I'm a monster___Thank you for reminding me what a terrible person I am.

You forgot to mention that I mistreat puppies, abuse kittens and steal food from babies.

Do you always misrepresent what people write? Do you ever actually answer challenges?
 
Wow___I'm a monster___Thank you for reminding me what a terrible person I am.

You forgot to mention that I mistreat puppies, abuse kittens and steal food from babies.

Actually, I don't think you're a monster...becuase I don't personally take the actions of the extreme minority of a group and equate them to the entire group and discount the entire group because of it.

YOU repeatedly in this thread have shown disdain for Homosexuals by pointing out an extreme minority such as drag queens or extremely over the top "leather and chaps" type of of flamboyant gays in parades. You use them as your reasoning and your basis for saying why you don't need to actually listen or give credance to their arguments. I'm just pointing out that people who are anti-gay and sugget homosexuality is a "perversion" ALSO have people who are of the extreme minority that engage in over the top, crazy, socially unacceptable behavior as well. And, upon pointing it out, asking if we should treat you by the same standard you seem to wish to choose gay people.

No clue if you mistreat puppies or abuse kittens...though I am still trying to find out if you like people to "abuse" your "kitten" with their tongues and if so is it an "unnatural sex act" when its done or is it magically okay because its done by two straight people.
 
...though I am still trying to find out if you like people to "abuse" your "kitten" with their tongues and if so is it an "unnatural sex act" when its done or is it magically okay because its done by two straight people.

Best sentence construction ever. :lol:
 
Thanks for sharing___I like yours better than both mine and the correct version.:thumbs:

It's not really mine. It's Dave Mustaine's.
 
Ah yes, compassionate conservatism...religious right flavored...

 
Ah yes, compassionate conservatism...religious right flavored...



Do you need to take calculus to become an evangelical preacher?
 
No clue if you mistreat puppies or abuse kittens...though I am still trying to find out if you like people to "abuse" your "kitten" with their tongues and if so is it an "unnatural sex act" when its done or is it magically okay because its done by two straight people.
Whether or not the "abuse" of my "kitten" is an "unnatural sex act" is relevant only to society and not the consenting participants and for this reason I keep my sexual escapades private and never demand public acceptance and legitimacy.

But, if society should attempt to regulate what I do in the privacy of my bedroom, we would definately have a problem__I will respect the societal rights of the public and require the public to respect my rights to privacy.

I believe that these rights apply to everyone regardless of their sexual preferences, providing of course that they are consensual and do not involve children__I cant be any clearer so I hope this answered your question.

Even though I have previously stated my views on this subject in various other posts, I assume you couldn't grasp the answer because it wasnt what you wanted or expected to hear.(which is most likely that, I hate homosexuals)

Like I have said many times, I couldn't care less what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms, but dragging their perversions into the public arena of society and demanding legitimacy and acceptance does spark public anger and resentment.
 
Do you need to take calculus to become an evangelical preacher?
I agree Thorgasm__Rick Perry is almost as dumb as 58state Obama.

I hope the American voters don't scrape the bottom of the barrel again next november.
 
Your comment about how what she does is a sick perversion, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Note: I really, really, really, really, want to say very mean things, but I am not, but I really should, because what you said in your post is ignorant (literally), hurtful, selfish, wrong, stupid, degrading, hurtful to human rights, terrible, dumb, etc etc.
 
Like I have said many times...[homosexuals] dragging their perversions into the public arena of society and demanding legitimacy and acceptance does spark public anger and resentment.

So the only difference between a gay pride parade and a Puerto Rican pride parade is the sexual aspect of the participants involved, even though that one section of their humanity is not the focus of the parade?
 
I agree Thorgasm__Rick Perry is almost as dumb as 58state Obama.

I hope the American voters don't scrape the bottom of the barrel again next november.

I thought it was 57 states.
 
Whether or not the "abuse" of my "kitten" is an "unnatural sex act" is relevant only to society and not the consenting participants and for this reason I keep my sexual escapades private and never demand public acceptance and legitimacy.

Your's specifically? I agree, which is why I was going generic for a good majority of my posts but the opening was just too big for me to ignore those play on words ;)

However, in a general sense I disagree completely. One of your arguments was specifically that homosexuality is bad because its based on an "unnatural sex act". Which is specifically implying that said ACT is what helps make homosexuality bad. In which case, if that arugment is even internally consistent with your own logic, then it must ALSO be unnatural when done between heterosexuals. I don't know of many lesbians going "YOU WILL PUBLICLY ACCEPT THAT I LICK *****!", I see only that they want people to accept they're homosexual. YOU however made the claim that somehow the acts they partake in are unnatural and thus is part of why they're bad. So I'm just wanting to see if you're consistent. So don't give me this "private" BS because you only are NOW falling on that as an excuse after you've been called on your statements earlier that had nothing to do with private or public.

But, if society should attempt to regulate what I do in the privacy of my bedroom, we would definately have a problem__I will respect the societal rights of the public and require the public to respect my rights to privacy.

So then why did you claim homosexuality was bad because of "unnatural sex acts" that are performed in their private places?

Even though I have previously stated my views on this subject in various other posts, I assume you couldn't grasp the answer because it wasnt what you wanted or expected to hear.(which is most likely that, I hate homosexuals)

I didn't expect to hear you hate homosexuals. Though you are telling me exactly what I expected to hear....a lot of dancing around and refusal to answer the question I gave you because you are inconsistent in your views, not because I think you hate homosexuals. You have no issue claiming that a PRIVATE act that homosexuals engage in are "unnatural sex acts" and yet type paragraph after paragraph trying to avoid having to make that same call regarding those exact same acts undertaken by heterosexuals.

Like I have said many times, I couldn't care less what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms

Sure seems like you do when you made comments negatively towards homosexuality based on the sex acts they perform in their bedrooms.

but dragging their perversions into the public arena of society and demanding legitimacy and acceptance does spark public anger and resentment.

Can't recall the last time I watched two lesbians publicly go down on each other or two dudes ****ing each other in the ass in the middle of the street, so again I'm not sure how your Public/private argument connects to your earlier statements about "unnatural sex acts".
 
Like I have said many times, I couldn't care less what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms, but dragging their perversions into the public arena of society and demanding legitimacy and acceptance does spark public anger and resentment.

You actually equate homosexuality to indecency in public. Let me guess, you also believe pedophiles are gay?
 
So the only difference between a gay pride parade and a Puerto Rican pride parade is the sexual aspect of the participants involved,
Actually, there is no comparison whatsoever and I imagine your statement would draw critisism from many in the puerto rican community.

even though that one section of their humanity is not the focus of the parade?
Even though it may not be the "focus" it is the basis of the parade__Their entire homosexual lifestyle revolves around their sexual orientation.
 
Actually, there is no comparison whatsoever and I imagine your statement would draw critisism from many in the puerto rican community.

I dunno...

img_5325.jpg


gay-pride-float-men.jpg


But seriously folks...how is there no comparison? What's the difference between pride in nationality and pride in sexual orientation?

Even though it may not be the "focus" it is the basis of the parade__Their entire homosexual lifestyle revolves around their sexual orientation.

You keep attempting to make homosexuals so much different from you. Does your entire life revolve around your sexual orientation?
 
As if somehow you were smarter than Obama? Priceless.
I would imagine my education and IQ blows obama's away plus I know how many states there are and that the P in corpsman is silent.

Actually, it is very likely that even you are probably smarter than obama___Try to find his IQ or school records.
 
But seriously folks...how is there no comparison? What's the difference between pride in nationality and pride in sexual orientation?

Either way, it's a salute to compatriots.


I would imagine my education and IQ blows obama's away...

You can beat editor of Harvard Law? Please, do tell. I wouldn't put my PhD up against that, even if it was Ivy.
 
Last edited:
I would imagine my education and IQ blows obama's away plus I know how many states there are and that the P in corpsman is silent.

Actually, it is very likely that even you are probably smarter than obama___Try to find his IQ or school records.

Oh dear Lord, you're a "education birther" too?

You can't be serious. I'm quite sure you have said stupid things in your life far more egregious than Obama's 57 states comments.

But humor all of us here. Compare your education to his.

And what gives with the underscores and the colored text? I mean really.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was 57 states.
What difference does it make?__Does being one state closer make him one state smarter?

(if this is an obama defense, it is a very weak one)
 
Back
Top Bottom