• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Just Plain Wrong

Top Cat said:
I feel even more appalled when I see a parade of uptight condescending arrogant Bible Thumpers myself. Hard to take anything they say seriously. Especially when they get togther and heal the sick, raise the dead and pray away the gay.
Click to expand...

Yeah, don't you hate the ones that dress up in leather and parade around with goats in diapers? Oh wait....
 
Thorgasm said:
No, I sniffed the vet's crotch. She's a cutie!
Click to expand...

See... Now you're getting it, just because animals do something, does not justify the same behaviour in humans. Besides, I am sure you mean you sniffed her butt... Probably wanted to know what she had eaten earlier.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
See, this is an example of you confusing your opinion with facts. First, you need to define normal. If you are using "normal" in the statistical sense, then you are correct. If you are using "normal" in the moral/value based sense, then you are absolutely incorrect, cannot prove that you are correct, and, therefore, your position is completely inaccurate and invalid. Stick to posting your opinions, lpast, and I doubt you will have problems. Post incorrect facts, or opinions masked as facts and your positions will get blasted and shown to be invalid every time.
Click to expand...

ahh you didnt disappoint me your favorite topic...and NO you have asked me the same question 20 times and ive answered it 3 and I shall not answer it again...define normal....and sorry Captain but my opinion counts to me alot more than yours does...
Im going to make this short then take my leave...half of america or more thinks like me...so my opinion is just as right as yours if not more so...bye
 
buck said:
Yeah, I guess if you are into assigning human feelings to animals, you probably do think it's love. Instead, most of the "gay" male penguins only exhibit that behaviour because there are not other females around. Once female penguins are introduced, most of the "gay" penguins leave their same sex relationship to form a bond with the opposite sex penguin. Most remain with the opposte sex penguin even after they are reintroduced with their previous same sex partner. In other words, they needed fixing and were ultimately fixed despite what an 8 year old boy says. All of this despite the outcries from the gay agenda that they should never be separated.
Click to expand...

Where did you get your zoology degree from again?
 
RadicalModerate said:
Where did you get your zoology degree from again?
Click to expand...

The zoologists indicate exactly what I said. Sorry that you disagree with it. I guess you must know better then the zoologists that actually studied it.
 
Top Cat said:
So people decide to be gay?

Now there's some pretzel logic.
Click to expand...

Of course they don't. But even if they could, they wouldn't have a moral obligation to choose it.

Put it this way - people don't have an obligation to choose not to have sex or not get married to a member of the same sex if they happen to be gay.
 
buck said:
I am not interested in arguing an opinion. It's pointless. You can have a different opinion then I. It makes no difference to me. I am secure enough in my opinion and the facts as I know them to be able to accept that you don't agree with me, and all the appeals to emotion that most liberals love will not cause me to change my mind.
Click to expand...

Then stop offering YOUR opinion. Only offer facts, since that's all you're willing to accept from others. Do not make another opinion statement ever on this forum again.
 
buck said:
If the pro-GM crowd are consistent, it would be a fact. I don't expect them to be consistent, though (my opinion).
Click to expand...

Your "opinion?" I thought you weren't interested in opinions. If you aren't interested in anyone else's, why do you think anyone should care about yours?
 
Empirica said:
The sight of hundreds of men gayly parading down a public city street in broad daylight dressed only in ladies pumps, panties and makeup with fluffy boas and colorful feathered head-dress tends to make many people question the seriousness of their oppression.

Not to mention, they are one of the most financially successful groups in America__The homosexual lifestyle is based entirely on unnatural sex acts, which most people have no problem with as long as they are not being forced to accept it as anything but what it is__Sick perversion.
Click to expand...

What does "accept" mean though?
 
Gardener said:
and don't forget - it can only be carried out within the holy confines of marriage, strictly missionary, and only with the express purpose of procreation.

and the women isn't supposed to enjoy it.
Click to expand...

No kissing either! The mouth is for eating. Kissing is unnatural!!!!
 
buck said:
Never mentioned it was sexual. So, apparently you are.

But apparently you are OK with Homosexual men humping stranger's legs in a sign of dominanace? After all, animals do it, so it must be OK. There are thousands of things animals do that would never be accepted in society, I only gave one.

Another example: A while ago, one of my dogs was raped by another dog and she got torn up pretty badly down there.. It happens in the animal world, so it must be OK and acceptable - according to your argument.
Click to expand...

That's funny, the "it's not natural" argument would seem to be arguing just that.

Oh, and wait - are you discussing opinions again?
 
Top Cat said:
I feel even more appalled when I see a parade of uptight condescending arrogant Bible Thumpers myself. Hard to take anything they say seriously. Especially when they get togther and heal the sick, raise the dead and pray away the gay.
Click to expand...

Or:

godhatesfags.jpg
 
buck said:
I am not interested in arguing an opinion. It's pointless. You can have a different opinion then I. It makes no difference to me. I am secure enough in my opinion and the facts as I know them to be able to accept that you don't agree with me, and all the appeals to emotion that most liberals love will not cause me to change my mind.
Click to expand...

The facts as you know them.... in other words...

noisepollution460.jpg
 
misterman said:
Put it this way - people don't have an obligation to choose not to have sex or not get married to a member of the same sex if they happen to be gay.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, with all those negatives, I'm too dizzy to attempt to comprehend what that sentence actually was intended to mean.
 
Top Cat said:
intolerant (ɪnˈtɒlərənt)
— adj (foll by of )
1.lacking respect for practices and beliefs other than one's own
2.not able or willing to tolerate or endure: intolerant of noise
Click to expand...

Well, glad to see you must be pointing out your own intolerance as well for the beliefs of others in regards to your derogatory treatment and disdain for religious beliefs.
 
Empirica said:
The sight of hundreds of men gayly parading down a public city street in broad daylight dressed only in ladies pumps, panties and makeup with fluffy boas and colorful feathered head-dress tends to make many people question the seriousness of their oppression.
Click to expand...

So should we judge straight people by the outrageous actions of a few? I guess this is representative of Straight People?

1464485595_5147c67d69.jpg


They're furries. People who enjoy dressing up in animals suits and having sex with each other, a movement full of lots of straight people.

Or maybe you're just talking about people who dress up CRAZILY. That of course never happens with straight people anywhere...

group-450x337.jpg


Ahh, wonderful straight Con goers. Yes, people dressed up in ladies pumps and panties is leagues more respectable than a group of adults dressed up like ****ing Pokemon.

Or perhaps you were meaning because some gay people did something in public that's offensive to some people, we should disregard the message and look down on the message of ALL gay people. No straights would ever do something in public that's offensive to some people....

WBC_20051202_sacco-topeka5.jpg


Oh wait...nope. Maybe we should disregard the messages of any straight people or any religious people.

Yes, we should definitely judge the entirety of gay people in this country on what a few outrageous ones do, that makes total sense.

Not to mention, they are one of the most financially successful groups in America__The homosexual lifestyle is based entirely on unnatural sex acts
Click to expand...

First, please explain how the homosexual "lifestyle" is based ENTIRELY upon ANY sex act. Is the "straight" lifestyle based around ****ing?

Second, so are straight people who perform oral sex to each other ALSO unnatural? Perhaps I'm actually beginning to understand why you're so up tight towards gay people........
 
Last edited:
Zyphlin said:
Well, glad to see you must be pointing out your own intolerance as well for the beliefs of others in regards to your derogatory treatment and disdain for religious beliefs.
Click to expand...

I find people who think they have the right to tell others how to live their lives repugnant. If that makes me intolerant, then I'm happily guilty.

For the record, I have absolutely no problem with people believing what they want. However, when your beliefs infringe on my rights, I have a big problem with that.

I also find it rather ironic that so many on the right, who preach less government, so desperately want government to enter the bedroom of citizens.
 
Last edited:
buck said:
But apparently you are OK with Homosexual men humping stranger's legs in a sign of dominanace? After all, animals do it, so it must be OK. There are thousands of things animals do that would never be accepted in society, I only gave one.
Click to expand...

Suggesting animals do it is not peoples explanation for why its "okay"

Suggesting animals do it is peoples, correct, counter that its "Unnatural" IE something not existing in nature.

Its a counter to the notion that being gay is BAD because its unnatural, not stating that it is GOOD because it is natural.

Not to mention the entire "Its unnatural argument" is kind of ridiculous. Shall we also ban people from being married if they have earrings? Placing metal pieces into ones body is not "natural". What about people who have pace makers or various prosthetic. That would make part of their body unnatural. And after all, according to those that dislike Homosexuality, its "bad" because its "Unnatural" so seemingly unnatural things are bad.
 
Top Cat said:
I find people who think they have the right to tell others how to live their lives repugnant. If that makes me intolerant, then I'm happily guilty.
Click to expand...

You're intolerance wasn't aimed at someone telling others how to live their lives. Your intolerance was towards someone having a different view and belief about how someone should live their life. You had no evidence nor suggestion on his part of attempting to tell others how they have to live their lives, only stating how HE views it.

I fully expect all the liberals who decry hypocrisy as the deadliest sin for a politician to show you the proper disdain for being such a hypocrite regarding intolerance.
 
Zyphlin said:
You're intolerance wasn't aimed at someone telling others how to live their lives.
Click to expand...

Well yes actually it was and still is. How so very right wing of you. Trying to tell me what or how I think.

Your intolerance was towards someone having a different view and belief about how someone should live their life.
Click to expand...

There's a huge difference between living one's life according to one's beliefs and supporting legislation so that others live their lives like you. I realize that many righties can't grasp that concept. Clearly you're having a great deal of difficulty. But most righties don't seem to have a problem cashing those religious right checks.


You had no evidence nor suggestion on his part of attempting to tell others how they have to live their lives, only stating how HE views it.
Click to expand...

And yet you so easily tell me what I'm thinking? Priceless.

I fully expect all the liberals who decry hypocrisy as the deadliest sin for a politician to show you the proper disdain for being such a hypocrite regarding intolerance.
Click to expand...

I'm sure they will be lining up. Honestly, it's hilarious that you are buying this steamy pile you're shoveling here.
 
misterman said:
Then stop offering YOUR opinion. Only offer facts, since that's all you're willing to accept from others. Do not make another opinion statement ever on this forum again.
Click to expand...

I am free to make my opinion known. Just as you are free to make your opinion known. However, I won't argue the opinion. I beleive that gay marriage is not something that should be offered. You believe that gay marrage is something that should be offered. There, both of our opinions are no out of the closet.
 
misterman said:
Your "opinion?" I thought you weren't interested in opinions. If you aren't interested in anyone else's, why do you think anyone should care about yours?
Click to expand...

My opinion was proven to be correct. In other words, it is now a fact. I get complaints because I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and see no point in arguing it. Someone else (I forget who it was, but it was in this thread) that is pro GM says basically the same thing, and you don't say a thing to him.
 
buck said:
See... Now you're getting it, just because animals do something, does not justify the same behaviour in humans. Besides, I am sure you mean you sniffed her butt... Probably wanted to know what she had eaten earlier.
Click to expand...

She had a bagel with cream cheese for breakfast.
 
misterman said:
That's funny, the "it's not natural" argument would seem to be arguing just that.

Oh, and wait - are you discussing opinions again?
Click to expand...

I really don't think you have a clue what's going on. So, i'll just ignore the rest of your posts in this topic. Thanks for trying though.
 
hazlnut said:
The facts as you know them.... in other words...
Click to expand...

Funny. I gave the facts on gay penguins as indicated by the people that actually study the subject...and the guy I posted to basically said "I can't hear you", and I am the one ignoring facts? Good try.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom