• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior

apdst said:
The Libbos aren't going to sit back and let some uppity nigger steal their spotlight. Not to mention the political clout they will lose, if Herman Cain wins the Republican nomination.

Let's face it folks, Liberalism is already on the ropes. A black Republican winning the presidential nomination will only serve to drive another nail in the coffin.
Click to expand...

You know for someone who hates people bringing up race, you certainly do all you ****ing can to keep it front and centre (when it benefits you of course).

These allegations have absolutely nothing to ****ing do with the fact that he's black. And whenever these kinds of allegations are made, everyone who supports that person acts like their person is being skewered, when in one to two weeks we'll be talking about something completely different and it wouldn't have mattered anyway.
 
apdst said:
I was only using an historical reference to show that just because Herman Cain is accused of doing, something, it doesn't necessarily diminish his chances of getting elected.
Click to expand...

I have little doubt this incident reduces his actual chances of getting elected in any way, shape or form.
 
apdst said:
The Libbos aren't going to sit back and let some uppity nigger steal their spotlight. Not to mention the political clout they will lose, if Herman Cain wins the Republican nomination.

Let's face it folks, Liberalism is already on the ropes. A black Republican winning the presidential nomination will only serve to drive another nail in the coffin.
Click to expand...
It's difficult for black Republicans to get elected to the House of Representatives. That requires a district to elect them and there have been only 5 over the last 100 years. It's even more difficult for black Republicans to get elected to the Senate. That requires a state to elect them and there has been only 1 over the last 100 years. You're dreaming if you think a black Republican can get enough states to vote for them to be elected president.

Republicans just don't elect blacks to federal office. At least not so much since the Reconstruction era.
 
apdst said:
The Libbos aren't going to sit back and let some uppity nigger steal their spotlight. Not to mention the political clout they will lose, if Herman Cain wins the Republican nomination.

Let's face it folks, Liberalism is already on the ropes. A black Republican winning the presidential nomination will only serve to drive another nail in the coffin.
Click to expand...

Well all us left wingers need to think only positive thoughts about Cain and hope that he does win that GOP nomination. I am also thinking only positive thoughts that this coming February will see average daily temperatures of at least 70 degrees here in Michigan.

I wonder which one has a more realistic chance of achieving fact?
 
rocket88 said:
I think it's more likely Romney or Perry. Unless you have some proof to back up your claim, which I doubt.
Click to expand...

Gutsy post. I would have proof but the media wouldn't.

No proof, just gut instinct. BO won his state seat in IL by digging into his opponent's legal records.

My point was that BO's involvement would make this story more interesting. So far all we have are vague allegations and talk of money being exchanged. There's not even so much as a Coke can.
 
LuckyDan said:
Gutsy post. I would have proof but the media wouldn't.

No proof, just gut instinct. BO won his state seat in IL by digging into his opponent's legal records.

My point was that BO's involvement would make this story more interesting. So far all we have are vague allegations and talk of money being exchanged. There's not even so much as a Coke can.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't even make sense for Obama to try to take out Cain ... the current polls have him beating Cain by a wider margin than Romney.
 
The Libbos aren't going to sit back and let some uppity nigger steal their spotlight. Not to mention the political clout they will lose, if Herman Cain wins the Republican nomination.
Click to expand...

Project much? What clout will they lose?

Let's face it folks, Liberalism is already on the ropes. A black Republican winning the presidential nomination will only serve to drive another nail in the coffin.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about. A black winning in the White House 50 years after Liberals passed the Civil Rights is a victory. A black Democrat and a black Republican running against each other for President is the ultimate victory of Liberalism.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
It wouldn't even make sense for Obama to try to take out Cain ... the current polls have him beating Cain by a wider margin than Romney.
Click to expand...

Now, yeah. I don't know what the numbers will look like a year from now, but Cain is a contender. He's also more black than BO and has better executive cred.
 
LuckyDan said:
Now, yeah. I don't know what the numbers will look like a year from now, but Cain is a contender. He's also more black than BO and has better executive cred.
Click to expand...

"More Black".

I thought race wasn't supposed to matter :coffeepap
 
LuckyDan said:
Now, yeah. I don't know what the numbers will look like a year from now, but Cain is a contender. He's also more black than BO and has better executive cred.
Click to expand...
Umm, he may have had better "executive cred" than Obama had 4 years ago, but now he'll have to go up against someone with years of presidential executive experience.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Umm, he may have had better "executive cred" than Obama had 4 years ago, but now he'll have to go up against someone with years of presidential executive experience.
Click to expand...

Cain can point to a record of success. BO can point to . . .
 
Jetboogieman said:
"More Black".

I thought race wasn't supposed to matter :coffeepap
Click to expand...

It doesn't unless you've got something to crow about. I knew this would be the thing for Cons. "Liberals hate Cain because he's "blacker!""
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
Did what you say cause the Dairy Queen owners pay the person some money to keep quiet about what you said?


If not I think what Cain probably said is rather more significant. Most organizations do not give payouts without a rather good reason
Click to expand...

The hell they don't... This is the 21st century baby, and in the politically correct world we live in today, accusations don't have to be proven to destroy a business of individual.
 
rocket88 said:
It doesn't unless you've got something to crow about. I knew this would be the thing for Cons. "Liberals hate Cain because he's "blacker!""
Click to expand...

No, liberals hate him because he's not liberal.

Obama fears him because he's blacker.
 
Last edited:
LuckyDan said:
Gutsy post. I would have proof but the media wouldn't.

No proof, just gut instinct. BO won his state seat in IL by digging into his opponent's legal records.

My point was that BO's involvement would make this story more interesting. So far all we have are vague allegations and talk of money being exchanged. There's not even so much as a Coke can.
Click to expand...

It would be more interesting, that is true. I'm not going to go and say the allegations are true, I really don't know.

My gut tells me it's got to be one of his opponents for the nomination. He's a much bigger threat to Romney or Perry than he is to Obama at this point. OK, he used dirty tricks in the past. I'm willing to bet that Perry didn't get to be Governor of Texas by paling around with boy scouts (or Romney for that matter).
 
LuckyDan said:
Cain can point to a record of success. BO can point to . . .
Click to expand...
Cain can point to his record of success in business which is pretty irrelevant since the United States is a country, not a business. It's funny how conservatives criticized Obama for being 'inexperienced' and then they throw their support behind some guy who hasn't even held a political office. It's so silly and transparent.
 
rocket88 said:
It would be more interesting, that is true. I'm not going to go and say the allegations are true, I really don't know.

My gut tells me it's got to be one of his opponents for the nomination. He's a much bigger threat to Romney or Perry than he is to Obama at this point. OK, he used dirty tricks in the past. I'm willing to bet that Perry didn't get to be Governor of Texas by paling around with boy scouts (or Romney for that matter).
Click to expand...

Perry didn't have to resort to dirty tricks. He was running in Texas against dems.
 
LuckyDan said:
If you actually cared you could research it. And if I cared what you think, I'd do it for you.
Click to expand...
I'm from Illinois and I remember that election very well, so I know all about what you're talking about.

Can you prove it or not? Probably not since you just resorted to personal attacks after I asked you a mere question.
 
theplaydrive said:
Cain can point to his record of success in business which is pretty irrelevant since the United States is a country, not a business. It's funny how conservatives criticized Obama for being 'inexperienced' and then they throw their support behind some guy who hasn't even held a political office. It's so silly and transparent.
Click to expand...

I agree in the sense that Cain's lack of political office makes him unelectable, but being an executive means being a decision maker. BO was never called upon to do more than vote yes or no. His handling of the presidency shows it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom