OK then I did in fact understand your statement correctly the first time.
How have they endangered non-protesters? Dangers of human waste? I don't even know what that means, in any event I have heard of no one throwing turds at anyone. While deification in a park might be odorous, unsightly, and just down-right disgusting it most definitely is not endangering anyone.
I have to disagree on that, human feces contains pretty much everything your body does which includes diseases that one may be an asymptomatic carrier for, some of the worst communicable diseases are spread through fecal matter, urine not as much but a miniscule probablility. The odor is attrocious but that is the least of problems. Just because it is left in a pile doesn't mean it can't be tracked around by animal or human transit and it does attract vermin and pestulent insects.
committing acts which could erupt in violence.... the only violence that has erupted is after the police took action against them,
I disagree, assualting the police will erupt in violence, furthermore there have been reports of unrest within the protests, I've seen enough bar fights in my younger days to know that little fights turn into big incidences pretty quickly.
up until that point they were peacefully squatting in a public park with little to no incident, The only incidents you have cited appear to be against other occupiers and by your own admission that is not what you are referring to.
Here's the thing, what I care about isn't what the law provides for. Squatting is a serious matter, but if there is enough internal problems eventually the police will be called on for a resolution, while I personally don't care what they do the laws are pretty clear. Thus the police come end and try to end the situation, when they do this it is unwise to fight them, thus resisting and endangerment.
I have heard of no reports of protesters accosting passers by.
Nor have I, but in other cities there were some calling for taking the protest to wealthy household properties, which is accostment and not cool.
Setting property on fire..... I haven't heard of that happening either.
I want to say that I heard passing reports on television and radio about trashcan fires, not sure though it sounds right.
You would really have to provide more than just speculation in order for your point to be valid. As a matter of fact anyone could accidentally set any property on fire at any time, to claim they are more apt to accidentally set a fire is just not a logically sound argument.
Think about it, risk is a numbers game, all it takes is a slipup with a lit cigarette, joint, or trash can too close to something flamable. Speculation or no there is logic behind that and it is the logic an insurer or law enforcement official would use.
Still waiting for you to show me a specific right of non-protesters' that the occupiers are infringing upon.
They have blocked roads in some cities, people have a right to transit so that's one. If they are in fact endangering property that is another, etc.