• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Herman Cain Leads Republican Field In Zogby Poll Has a new frontrunner emerged?

Centrist77 said:
you tell yourself what ever you need while everyone else reads the truth LMAO
Honestly how can you be so dishonest? You misspoke, it happens, you tried to insult me with a kneejerk reaction/assumption that was 100% wrong and I prooved it.
Now you cant even man up and admit it or continue the debate and stay on topic :shrug: quite entertaining
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO!!! Even more gibberish. Heeheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
 
LesGovt said:
ROFLMAO!!! Even more gibberish. Heeheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Click to expand...

Well not that we all didnt know this like 100 posts ago but your are just proving with each post that you are incable of honest debate and staying on topic :shrug:
 
Centrist77 said:
Well not that we all didnt know this like 100 posts ago but your are just proving with each post that you are incable of honest debate and staying on topic :shrug:
Click to expand...

Not at all. I have told the truth and you don't want to accept it. Do I care that you continue to spout gibberish? Uh, no.
 
Moderator's Warning:
OK, knock it off. No more posts not on topic. No more posts attacking others. No more posts that are nothing but smileys.
 
Ok back on topic. Like I said in my original point.
Herman Cain will never be president.

He is part of the problem with politics, not the solution.
He's a shock jock.
Hyper-partisan
Uses way to much bias empty rhetoric
To much blind attacking without any real solutions

He is nothing more than a mouth piece.

The American people are feed up with this style, especially most moderates and independents. They don't want people just in ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK mode because it doesn't fix anything.

Now don't get me wrong, this is nothing NEW but it comes in swings and right now running just an attack and smear campaign isn't going to get you anywhere near the white house.

Cain like Palin, Bachmann they may be good at RALLYING, and stirring up a crowd and are great at getting attention none of them will ever be president.
 
Centrist77 said:
He is part of the problem with politics, not the solution.
He's a shock jock.
Hyper-partisan
Uses way to much bias empty rhetoric
To much blind attacking without any real solutions
Click to expand...

That sounds like Obama.
 
LesGovt said:
That sounds like Obama.
Click to expand...

funny you seemed to only qoute PART of me this time, weird? LMAO

but it cant sound like Obama because he has never been a shock jock and like my FULL post Obama will never just attack the whole time and be hyper-partisan.
 
Here is the most recent poll I could find: Fox News Poll: GOP Race Top Tier | Fox News

Cain and Gingrich both up from earlier polls by FOX, Perry and Bachmann and Paul all down, Romney holding steady. Both Bachmann and Paul showing a steady decline, which is not a good thing for them, though neither was really a serious candidate.

Edit: question 10 is the GOP field.
 
Centrist77 said:
funny you seemed to only qoute PART of me this time, weird? LMAO

but it cant sound like Obama because he has never been a shock jock and like my FULL post Obama will never just attack the whole time and be hyper-partisan.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but Obama is most certainly a shock jock and his super partisan. To think otherwise is to ignore reality.
 
LesGovt said:
Sorry, but Obama is most certainly a shock jock and his super partisan. To think otherwise is to ignore reality.
Click to expand...

Really? would you like to back that up with anything of merit?
I noticed you ignored the "just attack the whole time" line again? odd lol

1 its obvious you dont know what a shock jock is

2 Obamas own party and supporters criticize him routinely for not being partisan enough. They say he is to soft in these regard, gives in to easy and trys to make to many people happy by reaching accross the isle to much, so Id love to know how he issuper partisan?

maybe to people that blindly judge everything he does with their own SUPER right bias but not to any objective,
 
Centrist77 said:
Really? would you like to back that up with anything of merit?
I noticed you ignored the "just attack the whole time" line again? odd lol

1 its obvious you dont know what a shock jock is

2 Obamas own party and supporters criticize him routinely for not being partisan enough. They say he is to soft in these regard, gives in to easy and trys to make to many people happy by reaching accross the isle to much, so Id love to know how he issuper partisan?

maybe to people that blindly judge everything he does with their own SUPER right bias but not to any objective,
Click to expand...

I agree that his own party thinks he is a milquetoast, but to the GOP he is a shock jock. Maybe you recall that Paul Ryan introduced his plan for a budget, something the President had not done or had not done well. Then the shock jock decided to give a speech on the budget and invited Ryan to attend and then viciously attacked Ryan and the GOP. Do you recall that? As I said, he is a shock jock and a total super partisan.
 
LesGovt said:
I agree that his own party thinks he is a milquetoast, but to the GOP he is a shock jock. Maybe you recall that Paul Ryan introduced his plan for a budget, something the President had not done or had not done well. Then the shock jock decided to give a speech on the budget and invited Ryan to attend and then viciously attacked Ryan and the GOP. Do you recall that? As I said, he is a shock jock and a total super partisan.
Click to expand...

again he is not a shock jock you obviously dont know what that term means, you are trying to reinvent the word or slang it up but in mot buying it LOL

and attacking a view does not make one "SUPER partisan"

doesnt even make since for you to acknowledge that his part thinks he is to soft and NON partisan but then you say he is SUPER partisan. LMAO


Its funny that his biggest flaw to objective people and supports is he is to non-partisan but some how you are trying to convince me he is SUPER partisan LMAO.

The issue is clearly you dont know what a shock jock is and you either dont understand what super partisan means or you yourself are too partisan to see that.

again Ill wait for you to back up your statements because you have given nothing logical to do so.
 
Last edited:
So any one interested in talking about the topic of this thread?
 
LesGovt said:
Thanks for bringing the thread back on topic. It is still early and polls really don't mean much at this point, even though it is fun to see where people are at a given time. I am very pleased to see Cain rising in the polls.
Click to expand...

me too, but i worry about the numbers if this thing runs on. Huckabee basically gave the nomination to McCain by keeping Romney from winning - Cain backed Romney last time around, and has already announced he wouldn't endorse Perry. It would be unfortunate to see him stay in the race to ensure a Romney victory; planning for an administration post.
 
Centrist77 said:
again he is not a shock jock you obviously dont know what that term means, you are trying to reinvent the word or slang it up but in mot buying it LOL

and attacking a view does not make one "SUPER partisan"

doesnt even make since for you to acknowledge that his part thinks he is to soft and NON partisan but then you say he is SUPER partisan. LMAO


Its funny that his biggest flaw to objective people and supports is he is to non-partisan but some how you are trying to convince me he is SUPER partisan LMAO.

The issue is clearly you dont know what a shock jock is and you either dont understand what super partisan means or you yourself are too partisan to see that.

again Ill wait for you to back up your statements because you have given nothing logical to do so.
Click to expand...

Obama is a shock jock and he is a super partisan. One would have to be blind, deaf, dumb, and/or a leftwing extremist not to see it.
 
cpwill said:
me too, but i worry about the numbers if this thing runs on. Huckabee basically gave the nomination to McCain by keeping Romney from winning - Cain backed Romney last time around, and has already announced he wouldn't endorse Perry. It would be unfortunate to see him stay in the race to ensure a Romney victory; planning for an administration post.
Click to expand...

Both Romney and Perry bother me. That is why I am considering Cain at this point. I think it would be terrific to put a black person in office by defeating Obama. I like his stand on the issues. I don't like Perry's immigration policies and I don't like how he implement the vaccine program in Texas. Romney has a problem with health care and I don't care for the way he is defending Social Security. I want to see something better than either one of them.
 
LesGovt said:
Obama is a shock jock and he is a super partisan. One would have to be blind, deaf, dumb, and/or a leftwing extremist not to see it.
Click to expand...

or not understand those words :shrug:
 
LesGovt said:
I understand them perfectly. Which are you? Blind? Deaf? Dumb? Leftwing extremist? :shrug:
Click to expand...

actually you clearly dont LMAO

a shock jock is a radio broadcaster/disc jockey. Thats not barack obama

you already admitted that Obama is to nice and easy and that is party thinks he is too NON-partisan but then turn around and say he is SUPER partisan. Well so, logically that makes no sense. Im guessing thats why you are only offering insults instead of anything that has merit :shrug:

let me know when you want to discuss the topic and actually back up your false claim.
 
Centrist77 said:
actually you clearly dont LMAO

a shock jock is a radio broadcaster/disc jockey. Thats not barack obama

you already admitted that Obama is to nice and easy and that is party thinks he is too NON-partisan but then turn around and say he is SUPER partisan. Well so, logically that makes no sense. Im guessing thats why you are only offering insults instead of anything that has merit :shrug:

let me know when you want to discuss the topic and actually back up your false claim.
Click to expand...

You mean Howard Stern is a shock jock? No, really? You can make up whatever you want. I know what I have said and I have spoken the truth. You need to learn to deal with it because your silliness causes me no grief whatsoever.
 
LesGovt said:
You mean Howard Stern is a shock jock? No, really? You can make up whatever you want. I know what I have said and I have spoken the truth. You need to learn to deal with it because your silliness causes me no grief whatsoever.
Click to expand...

then explain it with logic and back it up instead of talking circles. I made NOTHING up. nor am I trying to cause you grief???????? LMAO

HOW is obama a shock jock?

WHat logic are you using when you agree and admit that Obama's flaw that gets talked about most is that he is too soft and his own party thinks he is weak and too non partisan but then you turn around and say he is SUPER partisan.

WHAT did I make up?


all you gotta do is logically answer these questions and back them up with logic? :shrug:
 
Redress said:
So any one interested in talking about the topic of this thread?
Click to expand...

why would we be? endless bickering debates-about-the-debate are so much more substantive. :roll:
 
LesGovt said:
Both Romney and Perry bother me. That is why I am considering Cain at this point. I think it would be terrific to put a black person in office by defeating Obama. I like his stand on the issues. I don't like Perry's immigration policies and I don't like how he implement the vaccine program in Texas. Romney has a problem with health care and I don't care for the way he is defending Social Security. I want to see something better than either one of them.
Click to expand...

we've already put one political neophyte in the white house because he talked pretty. that doesn't seem to be turning out so well. but you are right indeed that both our major candidates have serious issues. as for Perry's immigration policies - the man is more on our side than not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom