• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

There Is No Travesty of Justice in Georgia. Execute Troy Davis

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
36,705
Reaction score
17,867
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
If this article is true then it looks like the scumbag sympathizers mislead everyone to push their their anti-death penalty cause.


There Is No Travesty of Justice in Georgia. Execute Troy Davis | RedState

In fact, one of the chief nuggets of the case is that there was no physical evidence. Except that is crap. There is the matter of Troy Davis’s bloody clothes that you’ve probably never heard of.
There was a .38 caliber gun. Both Troy Davis and the man Davis’s team claims in the real murderer, Sylvester Coles, had a .38 caliber gun.


snip..


But then there is Officer MacPhail himself and what the defense all too conveniently forgets to bring up. Officer MacPhail “testified” at Troy Davis’s murder trial. See, MacPhail, an Army Ranger and police officer was working a second job that night as a security guard. He chased Davis and Sylvester Coles, who were assaulting a homeless man over a beer.
MacPhail reported in that he had run passed Sylvester Coles. MacPhail was shot from the front in the chest and face — not from behind where Coles was, but from the front where MacPhail himself located Troy Davis.


In the laundry they found Troy Davis’s shorts from that night with evidence on the clothing directly tying him to Officer MacPhail’s murder — Officer MacPhail’s blood. (editorial note: it should be noted that Troy Davis’s shorts were not DNA tested. There were multiple people’s blood on his shorts)

According to Darrell Collins, who is now recanting everything or claiming not to remember anything, Davis admitted to Collins that Davis had shot MacPhail in the chest and then went back to shoot MacPhail in the head at close range because MacPhail had seen his face — hence MacPhail’s blood on Davis’s shorts. Oh, and at the time Collins gave his statement way back in 1989 it was not public knowledge that Officer MacPhail had been shot in the chest and then at close range in the face.


(remember as well that there were 34 witnesses, not the 9 as claimed. The defense claims seven witnesses changed their testimony. That’s actually not true. Only two materially changed their testimony and Davis’s attorneys refused to present those two in federal court in 2010 to be examined in the evidentiary hearing even though they sat outside the courtroom door.
 
Are you aware the Georgia Board of Pardons commutted the death penalty of a prisoner about whose guilt there was no doubt at all?

This week....but he was white.


The Disaffected Lib: Georgia Board of Pardons Commutes Death Sentence - For White Killer

Did you know that every second on this planet someone is taking a ****? Every 10 seconds someone is probably saying the word ****. You are probably wondering how this is relevant.Its relevant just like your but he is white is why he got off and Davis didn't comment.
 
Last edited:
The thing from the Davis case that I want looked into is how the witnesses said the police intimidated them into testifying against Davis. Whether or it would have changed his outcome, police intimidation is something that should be looked into.
 
I oppose the death penalty, so for me, it matters not whether he was guilty. One reason I oppose it is, the imposition of this ultimate penalty is VERY uneven between the genders, races and classes. But I'd be dishonest if I said that was my main reason.

I just think it's wrong.
 
I sat as a member of the jury on a murder trial a few years ago. Though in that particular case, I have no doubt that they got the right guy, it might have been possible that we didn't. Given what I witnessed, it would have been quite easy to railroad someone who was inoccent. I shudder to think that we've probably already executed people for murders they didn't commit, and maybe even for which they didn't have anything to do.

I'm not remotely against the death penalty. I think it ought to be applied to different crimes and with different evidentiary standards. I think I'd rather sentence someone like Jeff Skilling or Dennis Koslowski t death than Troy Davis, even if he was guilty of murder...
 
If this article is true then it looks like the scumbag sympathizers mislead everyone to push their their anti-death penalty cause.


There Is No Travesty of Justice in Georgia. Execute Troy Davis | RedState

In fact, one of the chief nuggets of the case is that there was no physical evidence. Except that is crap. There is the matter of Troy Davis’s bloody clothes that you’ve probably never heard of.
There was a .38 caliber gun. Both Troy Davis and the man Davis’s team claims in the real murderer, Sylvester Coles, had a .38 caliber gun.


snip..


But then there is Officer MacPhail himself and what the defense all too conveniently forgets to bring up. Officer MacPhail “testified” at Troy Davis’s murder trial. See, MacPhail, an Army Ranger and police officer was working a second job that night as a security guard. He chased Davis and Sylvester Coles, who were assaulting a homeless man over a beer.
MacPhail reported in that he had run passed Sylvester Coles. MacPhail was shot from the front in the chest and face — not from behind where Coles was, but from the front where MacPhail himself located Troy Davis.


In the laundry they found Troy Davis’s shorts from that night with evidence on the clothing directly tying him to Officer MacPhail’s murder — Officer MacPhail’s blood. (editorial note: it should be noted that Troy Davis’s shorts were not DNA tested. There were multiple people’s blood on his shorts)

According to Darrell Collins, who is now recanting everything or claiming not to remember anything, Davis admitted to Collins that Davis had shot MacPhail in the chest and then went back to shoot MacPhail in the head at close range because MacPhail had seen his face — hence MacPhail’s blood on Davis’s shorts. Oh, and at the time Collins gave his statement way back in 1989 it was not public knowledge that Officer MacPhail had been shot in the chest and then at close range in the face.


(remember as well that there were 34 witnesses, not the 9 as claimed. The defense claims seven witnesses changed their testimony. That’s actually not true. Only two materially changed their testimony and Davis’s attorneys refused to present those two in federal court in 2010 to be examined in the evidentiary hearing even though they sat outside the courtroom door.

Excellent information. But we all know most folks will refuse to give a **** about evidence that shows this is in fact, a justifiable execution.
 
Excellent information. But we all know most folks will refuse to give a **** about evidence that shows this is in fact, a justifiable execution.

To me, no execution is justifiable...and I live in Cleveland.

Surely you have heard of Anthony Sowell?
 
If this article is true then it looks like the scumbag sympathizers mislead everyone to push their their anti-death penalty cause.

Regardless of what your article says, it should be obvious to everyone that a retrial was required in light of new evidence.
 
Why bother posating this? All the very committed and dedicated people that 'cared' so deeply were done with this case before the corn flakes got soggy the next day.
 
If this article is true then it looks like the scumbag sympathizers mislead everyone to push their their anti-death penalty cause.


There Is No Travesty of Justice in Georgia. Execute Troy Davis | RedState

In fact, one of the chief nuggets of the case is that there was no physical evidence. Except that is crap. There is the matter of Troy Davis’s bloody clothes that you’ve probably never heard of.
There was a .38 caliber gun. Both Troy Davis and the man Davis’s team claims in the real murderer, Sylvester Coles, had a .38 caliber gun.


snip..


But then there is Officer MacPhail himself and what the defense all too conveniently forgets to bring up. Officer MacPhail “testified” at Troy Davis’s murder trial. See, MacPhail, an Army Ranger and police officer was working a second job that night as a security guard. He chased Davis and Sylvester Coles, who were assaulting a homeless man over a beer.
MacPhail reported in that he had run passed Sylvester Coles. MacPhail was shot from the front in the chest and face — not from behind where Coles was, but from the front where MacPhail himself located Troy Davis.


In the laundry they found Troy Davis’s shorts from that night with evidence on the clothing directly tying him to Officer MacPhail’s murder — Officer MacPhail’s blood. (editorial note: it should be noted that Troy Davis’s shorts were not DNA tested. There were multiple people’s blood on his shorts)

According to Darrell Collins, who is now recanting everything or claiming not to remember anything, Davis admitted to Collins that Davis had shot MacPhail in the chest and then went back to shoot MacPhail in the head at close range because MacPhail had seen his face — hence MacPhail’s blood on Davis’s shorts. Oh, and at the time Collins gave his statement way back in 1989 it was not public knowledge that Officer MacPhail had been shot in the chest and then at close range in the face.


(remember as well that there were 34 witnesses, not the 9 as claimed. The defense claims seven witnesses changed their testimony. That’s actually not true. Only two materially changed their testimony and Davis’s attorneys refused to present those two in federal court in 2010 to be examined in the evidentiary hearing even though they sat outside the courtroom door.


I said in another post...this case went through the entire process...appeal after appeal and was heard by the supreme court...if there were any wrong doings or lack of evidence it would have certainly become evident...the media is against the death penalty and purposely paints the picture they want you to see
 
Why bother posating this? All the very committed and dedicated people that 'cared' so deeply were done with this case before the corn flakes got soggy the next day.

If it can be shown an innocent man was executed, it will further the movement to end this practice substantially. So yes, it still matters.
 
If it can be shown an innocent man was executed, it will further the movement to end this practice substantially. So yes, it still matters.
Except that it hasnt been shown an innocent man was executed. What has been shown is a bunch of people cherry picked the 'evidence' they wanted to and made this person their poster child for their cause. They used him. He is dead and gone...and now they are gone...looking for the next poor unfortunate soul they can ride like a rented mule. The facts have always been ignored by the anti-death penalty crowd because frankly, they dont care about the facts or this particular case.
 
Except that it hasnt been shown an innocent man was executed. What has been shown is a bunch of people cherry picked the 'evidence' they wanted to and made this person their poster child for their cause. They used him. He is dead and gone...and now they are gone...looking for the next poor unfortunate soul they can ride like a rented mule. The facts have always been ignored by the anti-death penalty crowd because frankly, they dont care about the facts or this particular case.

I'll agree, the antiDP gang behaves badly at times. I don't agree with all their tactics. However, a case as marginal as this, examined after the execution with a judicial determination of whether Davis was at least entitled to a new trial is not a tactic that bothers me.

You do realize, if Davis was innocent, there's a cop killer who's been free these past years and will remain so?
 
If it can be shown an innocent man was executed, it will further the movement to end this practice substantially. So yes, it still matters.

But it wasn't shown that a innocent man was executed. The only thing this did was harm the scumbag sympathizer crowd because the next time the scumbag sympathizers make up claims that someone is innocent and claims that there was insufficient evidence it will fall on deaf ears. Because it appears that you people purposely mislead us.
 
I'll agree, the antiDP gang behaves badly at times. I don't agree with all their tactics. However, a case as marginal as this, examined after the execution with a judicial determination of whether Davis was at least entitled to a new trial is not a tactic that bothers me.

You do realize, if Davis was innocent, there's a cop killer who's been free these past years and will remain so?
5 witnesses never wavered. The fact that Davis is the ONLY person that could have shot both people is also conveeniently ignored. The individual who later confessed, then recanted...while both he and Davis owned the same type of pistol, only Davis was at both sites. And while the blood evidence thrown out during the search couldnt be used during the trial it certainly speaks loud and clear in the aftermath. I dont see any 'evidence' to point to his innocence...just a bunch of people that have changed their story over the course of a few decades.

Im against the death penalty myself but it has nothing to do with this case or any individuals rights.
 
...They used him. He is dead and gone...and now they are gone...looking for the next poor unfortunate soul they can ride like a rented mule.

I'd be ecstatic if people "used" me by trying very hard to save my life while the people who aren't using me clamor for my death.

For the record, there's something amazingly absurd about trying to paint a condemned man as being victimized by those who are attempting to save his life as part of an argument in favor of killing him.
 
I'd be ecstatic if people "used" me by trying very hard to save my life while the people who aren't using me clamor for my death.

For the record, there's something amazingly absurd about trying to paint a condemned man as being victimized by those who are attempting to save his life as part of an argument in favor of killing him.
Whats amazingly absurd is the number of people that pretend to care about the individual and his poor tragic case. It might help if they actually KNEW about which dead mule they were hopping on...might even help if they were a little more selective about the mules they whupped.

A few months ago we had people all up in arms about the tragic execution of a man...a man who had been in this country damn near his whole life, but for a technicality, he should have had his life spared. Nev er mind the fact that he was given a fair trial, effective counsel, and was in fact guilty of raping children and then bashing their heads in with rocks. In THIS case we have an individual who was convicted of shooting an officer (and also of shooting another individual earlier that night. People focused in the unreliable testimony of several people while ignoring the inconveeenient facts...5 people that testified as to his identity whose account of the incident never wavered. The fact that he was the only person that could have shot both individuals on that evening. They ignore the evidence that is there and still points to one person...Troy Davis. Oh...Im sure he enjoyed the international celebrity status he held. Doesnt make him any less guilty of shooting two people and killing one of them.
 
Facinates me that its seems it was ok to let him be in jail for 20 years, but when it came to carrying out the final judgement, it is now you have the wrong person. I am not convinced. Our system is not perfect, yet it is a lot better than many other countries.
 
Whats amazingly absurd is the number of people that pretend to care about the individual and his poor tragic case.

Who cares whether their intentions were misguided? The fact remains that if they were "using him", they were doing so in the most beneficial way possible for him

It might help if they actually KNEW about which dead mule they were hopping on...might even help if they were a little more selective about the mules they whupped.

It might help their cause, but it wouldn't do **** all to help him. In order to be used, the person being used can't be the only one who benefits from the situation.

If anything, the people who were arguing his cause were being used by him. Not the other way around.
 
Facinates me that its seems it was ok to let him be in jail for 20 years, but when it came to carrying out the final judgement, it is now you have the wrong person. I am not convinced. Our system is not perfect, yet it is a lot better than many other countries.
That's because to most of these scumbag sympathizers a persons innocence has little to no relevance to their opposition of the death penalty.To them its just a tool for them to use to try to guilt people into not supporting the death penalty.

Now there are some groups of people who actually do care if someone behind bars is innocent and they try to get DNA tests done and other things to help exonerate someone.
 
Who cares whether their intentions were misguided? The fact remains that if they were "using him", they were doing so in the most beneficial way possible for him



It might help their cause, but it wouldn't do **** all to help him. In order to be used, the person being used can't be the only one who benefits from the situation.

If anything, the people who were arguing his cause were being used by him. Not the other way around.
Lets call it a mutually beneficially 'using'...one where everyone wins. He gets to enjoy a little bit of celebrity and goes down as a footnote in history, they get to pretend an innocent man was 'murdered'.

Im fine with people that are truly opposed to the death penalty and stand against it no matter what. I would naturally have expected to see more of them rallying around the KKK member executed on the same day, just for consistency sake. And it would be nice if they were so committed to fight the death penalty for the unborn. I just think it is a wee bit hypocritical to slide in when something hits the newspapers, suddenly express concern and outrage, then move on the next headline. Its equally hypocritical to pretend they care about their guilt or innocence when all that they really care about is the death penalty.
 
Back
Top Bottom