• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breitbart: We have the guns

Re: Breitbart to Teabaggers; "We Outnumber (Liberals) And We Have The Guns!"

Breitbart To Tea Partiers: ‘We Outnumber (Liberals) And We Have The Guns!’ | Mediaite

As a liberal I have been expecting something like this for a long time. And I think Breitbart is correct. We liberals politic, but no one is really afraid of us. We have earned our reputation as whimps.

As a liberal I have been criticized in this forum for being too outspoken against illegals, Muslims, and Catholics. I have been called a conservative.

I am eager to see the posts in this thread. Will it be more whining impractical liberal drivel or will posters realize sheep are easily slaughtered by wolves.

Remember the movie Lord of the Flies where the rational, intelligent leader becomes a victim of Teabagger type radicalism. That was a warning. This is a warning. These Teabaggers are out to get America, and they are NOT afraid of us or the law.

View attachment 67115885

We remember this psycho for
leaking the Anthony Wiener pictures.

Andrew Breitbart - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Freudian Slip on your part, says a lot about YOU.
 
I thought the title was bret "the hitman" heart saying we have the guns. I'm disappointed it was this nobody.
 
I wonder what the correlation is between conservatives in this thread acting like Breitbart's statement is no big deal and conservatives in the threads about the union dude saying "take the sons of bitches out" whining about violent liberal rhetoric.
 
I wonder what the correlation is between conservatives in this thread acting like Breitbart's statement is no big deal and conservatives in the threads about the union dude saying "take the sons of bitches out" whining about violent liberal rhetoric.

probably because union perpetrated violence is well documented over the last 80 or so years, especially mob run unions like the teamsters and tea party violence is as scarce as rocking horse crap
 
First let me say I thank God I live in a time and place where we can settle things without civil war. Having said that I believe his point was correct, we have the guns and the balls. Alan Colms types would be very easy to beat in a civil war. Lets hope that never happens though.-
 
probably because union perpetrated violence is well documented over the last 80 or so years, especially mob run unions like the teamsters and tea party violence is as scarce as rocking horse crap

Conservative violence is well documented over the last... well, forever.

Literally since the beginning of written history.

edit: But by all means, continue to explain how you justify hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
How do you figger it's so stupid?

1) It is a stretch at best, totally inaccurate at worst to call some of those "Leftists".

2) None of those have anything to do with modern US liberalism.

3) Your choice was a pure appeal to emotion.

4) Godwinn
 
In the News: "Extremist says something stupid. Extremists on the other side become hysterical over it. Film at Eleven."

Yawn. :coffeepap

Just like the Jimmy Hoffa thread.
 
I wonder what the correlation is between conservatives in this thread acting like Breitbart's statement is no big deal and conservatives in the threads about the union dude saying "take the sons of bitches out" whining about violent liberal rhetoric.

And I wonder how many liberals are doing the reverse.
 
Andrew Breitbart is not alone. Sadly we have heard much the same thing right here on this very forum. people bragging about how many guns they have, what cracker jack shots they are, how they will take out scores of leftists should the day ever arrive, and other machismo chest thumping amounting to 'make my day' bravado.

At its core. it reveals something about the far right and their agenda that we see being played out in Wisconsin. Michigan, Ohio and - if they win in 2012 - sure to be seen in Washington DC as well as they repeal the New Deal.

The implication from this type of machismo is clear and unmistakable - we will bend you over the table - we will take away your rights - we will lower you to the level of a second class citizen - and you dare not do anything about it because we will kill you if you do.

A strain of fascism comes to the USA courtesy of Breitbart, the tea party, ALEC, CATO, and their sycophants and toadies in Congress.
You fail to understand. We are not the bullies. We are the ones who want to be left alone to live and enjoy our lives.

The state has grown well beyond what the Constitution allows. Many believe the US Federal government is now the greatest threat we face to our lives, our liberty and our property. A majority believe the government rules rather than governs. It no longer governs with the consent of the governed. This is a very dangerous situation.

So what do we do? Do we kick the bully in the balls, smash in his teeth and take back the playground? Or do we look for what comes after America has fallen?
 
Last edited:
Praying this is hyperbole from Breitbart. The last thing this country needs is another civil war.
And yet it is possible it will come to that. We have two visions of America. Each is antithetical to the other. And the left just keeps pushing and bullying. Eventually we are going to come to blows. And war will decide the issue as war always does.
 
The second amendment is for organized resistance (or a well regulated militia) against oppressive governments (at least this is what I can tell, given what I know of the history of this amendment). This does not necessarily mean that it is for killing one's fellow citizens who may disagree on policy. There is a very not fine line there.
It takes between 3-5% of the population actively working and roughly 1/5th more passively supporting for a revolution to have a chance to succeed. Three percent is a hard number to reach.
 
The second amendment is for organized resistance (or a well regulated militia) against oppressive governments (at least this is what I can tell, given what I know of the history of this amendment).
Well, maybe. Well regulated today might be written as well trained in the use of their firearms. If you can hit what you aim at you are well regulated.
 
It takes between 3-5% of the population actively working and roughly 1/5th more passively supporting for a revolution to have a chance to succeed. Three percent is a hard number to reach.

Thanks for the random statistics!
 
It takes between 3-5% of the population actively working and roughly 1/5th more passively supporting for a revolution to have a chance to succeed. Three percent is a hard number to reach.

Can you show where you got these numbers from please.
 
Conservative violence is well documented over the last... well, forever.

Literally since the beginning of written history.

edit: But by all means, continue to explain how you justify hypocrisy.

nothing compared to the millions murdered by leftwing and collectivist governments such as Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler etc
 
Can you show where you got these numbers from please.
What is it with you people? No. I am not going to waste any of my time sourcing these numbers. They were hard earned from years of studying many revolutions, successful and unsuccessful through the last three hundred years or so.
Take them or leave them. I don't care one way or the other.
 
What is it with you people? No. I am not going to waste any of my time sourcing these numbers. They were hard earned from years of studying many revolutions, successful and unsuccessful through the last three hundred years or so.
Take them or leave them. I don't care one way or the other.

So basically we can safely assume you made them up. Thank you. Did you know 97 % of all unattributed statistics used on message boards are made up? I base that on years of study.
 
nothing compared to the millions murdered by leftwing and collectivist governments such as Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler etc

:lamo

So stupid it had to be repeated...
 
So basically we can safely assume you made them up. Thank you. Did you know 97 % of all unattributed statistics used on message boards are made up? I base that on years of study.
Take them or leave them. I don't particulary care.
 
Back
Top Bottom