• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

High School Girls Have the Right to Upload Lewd Pictures

Tucker Case said:
As far as the OP goes, it is a good ruling. Schools are not intended to be parents.
Click to expand...

School officials, i. e. teachers, administrators, are expected to assume the role of the parent while children are at school. Ever heard of In loco parentis?
 
Tucker Case said:
As far as the OP goes, it is a good ruling. Schools are not intended to be parents.
Click to expand...

No matter how many parents rely on schools to teach their children about life and discipline, etc.
 
lpast said:
Do any of you ever wonder why theres so many young girls and women going missing and found brutalized and murdered....do you think this kind of behavior and permissiveness adds to that ? Young men today have far less respect for women than my generation did....and like my opinion or not...its the girls and women that gave that respect up....shame...I personally like having respect for women
Click to expand...

Rape and murder have nothing to do with sex, and everything to do with power, control, and domination. Shame on you for implying that women who are raped have only themselves to blame.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1059758129 said:
School officials, i. e. teachers, administrators, are expected to assume the role of the parent while children are at school. Ever heard of In loco parentis?
Click to expand...

So you believe that schools are intended to be parents?
 
DiAnna said:
Rape and murder have nothing to do with sex, and everything to do with power, control, and domination. Shame on you for implying that women who are raped have only themselves to blame.
Click to expand...
I dont think he was excusing that it happens...just pointing out that slutty little bitches that present women in such a negative light certainly dont help enhance the reputation of women in general and certainly contribute to the way many young men view women in general. Rather than being pissed at him for pointing out a truth it might be helpful to tell young women to stop presenting themselves as such sluts in the first place.
 
TheGreatSandeno said:
But if another person, say an older man, takes this picture off of Facebook and views it on his computer, wouldn't that be pretty damn close to child pornography?
Click to expand...

They aren't nude, so, no.
 
jamesrage said:
Personally I think the judge should have ruled that what student do off campus in none of the business of the principal.

High School Girls Have the Right to Upload Lewd Pictures

It's official: High school girls have a constitutionally protected right to post to Facebook pictures of themselves in lingerie toying with phallic lollipops. America is not Saudi Arabia, you know! We are not under Sharia law (yet).

A federal judge in Indiana sided with the ACLU in ruling that a high school principal was wrong to punish two girls, 15 and 16, for posting pictures of slumber parties in which they... well... let's just blockquote:

A fully-clothed M.K. [one of the teens] is sucking on one lollipop while another lollipop is positioned between her legs and a fully-clothed T.V. is pretending to suck on it. During another sleepover, [the other teen] T.V. took a picture of M.K. and another girl pretending to kiss each other... In another, T.V. is shown bent over with M.K. poking the trident between her buttocks. A third picture shows T.V. positioned behind another kneeling girl as if engaging in anal sex. In another picture, M.K. poses with money stuck into her lingerie — stripper-style.
Click to expand...

Schools often over step their bounds and delve into areas that are none of their business, when they should be concentrating on what they a qualified to do. What ever that is, since a large number as we know can't teach worth a damn.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Not that sucking a lollipop is pornagraphic, but when teens post nude pictures and videos of themselves and they are minors -- aren't they distributing child porn?
Click to expand...

I agree with this statement, and so does the law I think. However, I have heard stories of teenagers being charged with child pornography for having photos of another teen they know naked - and that I disagree with.
 
jamesrage said:
Personally I think the judge should have ruled that what student do off campus in none of the business of the principal.


High School Girls Have the Right to Upload Lewd Pictures

It's official: High school girls have a constitutionally protected right to post to Facebook pictures of themselves in lingerie toying with phallic lollipops. America is not Saudi Arabia, you know! We are not under Sharia law (yet).

A federal judge in Indiana sided with the ACLU in ruling that a high school principal was wrong to punish two girls, 15 and 16, for posting pictures of slumber parties in which they... well... let's just blockquote:

A fully-clothed M.K. [one of the teens] is sucking on one lollipop while another lollipop is positioned between her legs and a fully-clothed T.V. is pretending to suck on it. During another sleepover, [the other teen] T.V. took a picture of M.K. and another girl pretending to kiss each other... In another, T.V. is shown bent over with M.K. poking the trident between her buttocks. A third picture shows T.V. positioned behind another kneeling girl as if engaging in anal sex. In another picture, M.K. poses with money stuck into her lingerie — stripper-style.
Click to expand...

What's with the explicit description of what the teenage girls are doing?
 
When all is said and done, it amounts to legalized decadence.
 
jamesrage said:
What do you mean?
Click to expand...

The OP. It sure has a lot of detail about what underage minors were doing. Not trying to insinuate anything; just saying.
 
Anyone else think the title feels a bit ... sensationalized? I mean, sure it can be interpreted that way, but my thought is that the judge is acting upon the notion that what goes on outside of school, off of school grounds, should be dealt with by the parents - and not something the school should get involved with. If that's the case, I completely agree with the idea.
 
Tashah said:
When all is said and done, it amounts to legalized decadence.
Click to expand...

Since when is "decadence" something that is illegal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom