So she's going to ban Playboy... lol. What about the free market? Is she going to stop married people from making their own porn for themselves... wtf. BIG GOVERNMENT
Reading Think Progress ends in willfull ignorance...........
"support human protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy” and protect them from “seduction into promiscuity and all forms of pornography…and other types of coercion or stolen innocence"
Nowhere does it say, or much less imply, that Bachman is going to ban all pornography........except in the brain dead minds of the "journalists" at Think Democrat.
.
.
.
.
Only from a religious idiot!
We have more important things to worry about.
There's no way that she will get the nom.
BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress
Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.
Break out the Burkas.
Does this mean that future Anthony Weiners will be stoned to death?
I haven't read the rest of this thread, and I don't really need to.
The reason why is because any President who tries to ban pornography will face the wrath of Anonymous. And, currently, the President has very little ability to deal with Anonymous.
So in a fight against the President, no matter who it may be, and against Anonymous I know who will win.
So if Bachmann gets elected as President and tries to ban pornography, I wish her all the luck in the world dealing with the ****storm that will fly at her because of it.
I wish her that luck because she's gonna need it.
Perhaps you should start using actual quotes.
I support this measure by Michelle, I think the liberal media didn't report on the whole story.
Shes probably doing this to curb blindness rates :lol:
I support this measure by Michelle, I think the liberal media didn't report on the whole story.
Shes probably doing this to curb blindness rates :lol:
Perhaps you should start reading the news. Your tendency to disagree with me purely because I say something suggests you are someone's sock pupeet.
I only wish Bachmann was saying all of these insane things 6 months before the election, not 1.5 years.
And what "insane things" was that, Thunder?
I know of no way to "protect women and children from pornography" without making it unavailable for public consumption. The only way to ensure that children will not be exposed to pornography is to get it completely off the internet. That calls for massive censorship that is both unconstitutional and immoral.
I know of no way to "protect women and children from pornography" without making it unavailable for public consumption. The only way to ensure that children will not be exposed to pornography is to get it completely off the internet. That calls for massive censorship that is both unconstitutional and immoral.
Fixed. :mrgreen:
I only wish Bachmann was saying all of these insane things 6 months before the election, not 1.5 years.
most of the things quoted in this thread, and many of the other insane things she has said over the last 2 years.
Seriously folks, read the document, and especially read the footnote to the point this is referring to. it does not call for a ban of porn, nor for further regulations in it's consumption. It is talking about, as the footnote makes clear, kiddy porn, and protecting children from that. It's footnote 17 if any one wants to look.
I have read footnote 17. It makes special mention of specific things, like child pornography. This is an expansion of the main point, rather than a narrowing of it. The phrase "all forms of pornography", in the main body, seems pretty clear. And I'm aware that they have since commented, and said that they do not call for a ban on all pornography. However, it is clear to me that the authors of this pledge did have massive censorship in mind when they wrote it. The fact that they were willing to reverse this stance, publicly, in the face of controversy, does not suggest to me that their position that censorship is okay as long is it fits their morals, has changed.