• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bachmann Literally Praised Government Pork In Letter To Obama Official

Jetboogieman said:
So you're saying she is a hypocrite then... She's against subsidies but uses them...

Do you have any idea how almost every time you speak, you defeat your own argument...
Click to expand...

How is the government feeding the poor a subsidy? It is more an entitlement program. To say there is hypocrisy means you are against the feds feeding the poor
 
ptif219 said:
How is the government feeding the poor a subsidy? It is more an entitlement program. To say there is hypocrisy means you are against the feds feeding the poor
Click to expand...

LOL!

Oh this is too rich!

I'm not against Bachmann, I want her to be president, I'm not against feeding the poor, nothing in my posts suggested that...

You do enjoy building straw men dont you?

But you don't see it as hypocritical that if I railed against social programs... And farm subsidies, but them used them... That's mot hypocritical?
 
Jetboogieman said:
LOL!

Oh this is too rich!

I'm not against Bachmann, I want her to be president, I'm not against feeding the poor, nothing in my posts suggested that...

You do enjoy building straw men dont you?

But you don't see it as hypocritical that if I railed against social programs... And farm subsidies, but them used them... That's mot hypocritical?
Click to expand...

You are claiming hypocrisy because she supports products from her state being purchased to feed the poor. What else could I think?
 
Jetboogieman said:
If shes principles yes.

Because by extension whether the food goes to the poor or not... Is irrelevant, she's a hypocrite accepting money from the federal government to prop up something that wouldn't exist with out.

And it getting propped up, to feed the poor means that she's a...

Wait for it everyone...

A...

SOCIALIST
Click to expand...

Most excellent.... IF she has principles. Which she obviously does not. She wants money and fame and power and will violate her own so called beliefs to get it and has done as as proven by this sad situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom