• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rolling back union busting in Ohio

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
In Wisconsin, they are killing off union busting through a recall effort, but in Ohio, they chose another route, by collecting more than 714,000 signatures, more than 3 times as many as needed to put it on a referendum ballot. Here is the sweet part of it all - The law is now going to be blocked from going into effect, and when the referendum wins this November, it will be as though the law was never passed at all..... With a caveat - Many of those who voted for this union busting law will be up for reelection.

From the Facebook page of "We are Ohio"
 
I wouldn't get too excited just yet. Ohio has an average voter turn out of 56.3% and a total population of 11,542,645. So on average you'll see 6,498,509.1 people turn out to vote. Now, special elections, or votes held during off-seaon have a typical turn out of 10% in Ohio. They'd have to get 577,132.25 people to get an even split on vote, and with voter turn out on an off-season vote so low, it is probably safe to assume that the majority of that 714k might not turn up at the ballot box. Also, 714k people is only about 6% of the total state population....
 
Turnout will indeed have an effect, this being an off-cycle vote usually means a light turnout. So you then turn to the enthusiasm factor. Those in favor of repeal rallied and actively pursued three quarters of a million signatures to initiate a referendum on SB 5. Those who oppose repeal did nothing. AFAICT there was no push from the voters to restrict bargaining rights of public workers. It was just a by-product of electing conservatives and it looks like, according to polls, that a majority of them didn't agree.


A Quinnipiac poll from mid May shows that 54 - 36 percent say that SB 5 should be repealed.

Ohio (OH) Poll * May 18, 2011 * Ohio Gov's Approval Up, But Mo - Quinnipiac University – Hamden, Connecticut


PPP's poll has it 54 to 31 in favor of repeal.

Public Policy Polling: Brutal numbers for Kasich, SB 5
 
Wow, those numbers are really bad.
 
I'm so torn on this issue. This is one of the few things I've actually gotten into a political argument about in real life. My mom is a teacher, and a member of the teacher's union, and we had a rather heated discussion about it last time I was home.

Because while I do think that teachers' unions do some negative things (like hiring and firing based solely on seniority), they also do good things too (like fighting to keep class sizes small).
 
I wouldn't get too excited just yet. Ohio has an average voter turn out of 56.3% and a total population of 11,542,645. So on average you'll see 6,498,509.1 people turn out to vote. Now, special elections, or votes held during off-seaon have a typical turn out of 10% in Ohio. They'd have to get 577,132.25 people to get an even split on vote, and with voter turn out on an off-season vote so low, it is probably safe to assume that the majority of that 714k might not turn up at the ballot box. Also, 714k people is only about 6% of the total state population....
i'll be there to vote sb5 down.
 
the unions will probably win because they are wetting their pants over this bill and most of us who support it aren't going to turn out for that. I will vote-I haven't missed an election in years but most people who tire of union nonsense aren't as riled up as the public unions who want to keep looting the public treasury and their private sector "brothers" who are brainwashed by the union bosses who are agents of the democratic party
 
the unions will probably win because they are wetting their pants over this bill and most of us who support it aren't going to turn out for that. I will vote-I haven't missed an election in years but most people who tire of union nonsense aren't as riled up as the public unions who want to keep looting the public treasury and their private sector "brothers" who are brainwashed by the union bosses who are agents of the democratic party
:roll: yep, we are all brainwashed:roll:
 
:roll: yep, we are all brainwashed:roll:

many of you are. I have dealt with unions for years. I remember at one firm we dealt with the main Unions at AK steel. One week we got four bogus grievances including one where the union member got a suspension for driving a fork lift while drunk which he punched through a wall in the unit where he was working causing about 40K in damages.

so we go to the grievance arbitration (the union lost at step one and step two) and I ask the Union rep WTH was going on and he took me aside and said, Counselor this is as far as this grievance goes but elections are next week and we have to keep the members happy even though both of us know its a bs grievance. So we win the arbitration and the Union rep threatens a suit-which of course never happened since his slate was re-elected before the time to file was up.

my experience of doing labor related cases (among other things) for 26 years-yeah most of the RaF are brainwashed by the bosses
 
many of you are. I have dealt with unions for years. I remember at one firm we dealt with the main Unions at AK steel. One week we got four bogus grievances including one where the union member got a suspension for driving a fork lift while drunk which he punched through a wall in the unit where he was working causing about 40K in damages.

so we go to the grievance arbitration (the union lost at step one and step two) and I ask the Union rep WTH was going on and he took me aside and said, Counselor this is as far as this grievance goes but elections are next week and we have to keep the members happy even though both of us know its a bs grievance. So we win the arbitration and the Union rep threatens a suit-which of course never happened since his slate was re-elected before the time to file was up.

my experience of doing labor related cases (among other things) for 26 years-yeah most of the RaF are brainwashed by the bosses
sure sure turtle, whatever you say:roll:
 
sure sure turtle, whatever you say:roll:
"you're wrong, we're right, no matter what".

Yeah, just keep thinkin' like that. Then again, the vast majority of people think like that.
 
So just out of curiosity...every time this discussion comes up, how come no one loses their damn mind over the New York union cuts?
 
sure sure turtle, whatever you say:roll:

I don't agree with the Turtle on a number of issues, but I read people very well. In my dealings with him, I have found him to be an honest guy. I don't believe he is lying. And what he says is further backed up by my own real life experience:

From 1974-1975, I worked at Lear-Siegler in Grand Rapids, Michigan, troubleshooting and repairing AYN-1 and DC-130 navigational computers. The union there was the UAW, and I was a member. Union membership was required and automatic. My time at Lear-Siegler was probably the worst experience of my life, so for me, personally, I am anti-union. However, I am very much pro-union for those who want to be in a union. This is capitalism at work, workers exploiting the sweat off their brow, just as companies also exploit it. Samuel Adams, in his writings, gave the right to exploit resources to everybody, not just a select few. And for the government to attempt to stop one group of people from exploiting their own resources (the sweat from their brow) smacks of tactics used by the old Communist Bloc nations. In Poland, it was the unions who threw the Communists out of office. And don't forget that, under Communism, unions were busted down and made illegal, until the unions rose up and did their part to help defeat the Communists. But for me, personally, I don't want to be part of a union.

And what I have seen in the UAW, while I was in it, is much the same as TD was talking about. I would suggest that, instead of attacking the Turtle with inane phrases, you come up with a thought-out counter argument for what he posted. But I don't think you can, because I don't think those kind of counter arguments actually exist. I might be wrong, though, so why don't you try and see if you can change my mind. It will take a bit more that what you have posted. Actually, it will take a hell of a lot more. :mrgreen:

DarkWizard12 said:
"you're wrong, we're right, no matter what".

That cuts both ways.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree with the Turtle on a number of issues, but I read people very well. In my dealings with him, I have found him to be an honest guy. I don't believe he is lying. And what he says is further backed up by my own real life experience:

From 1974-1975, I worked at Lear-Siegler in Grand Rapids, Michigan, troubleshooting and repairing AYN-1 and DC-130 navigational computers. The union there was the UAW, and I was a member. Union membership was required and automatic. My time at Lear-Siegler was probably the worst experience of my life, so for me, personally, I am anti-union. However, I am very much pro-union for those who want to be in a union. This is capitalism at work, workers exploiting the sweat off their brow, just as companies also exploit it. Samuel Adams, in his writings, gave the right to exploit resources to everybody, not just a select few. And for the government to attempt to stop one group of people from exploiting their own resources (the sweat from their brow) smacks of tactics used by the old Communist Bloc nations. In Poland, it was the unions who threw the Communists out of office. And don't forget that, under Communism, unions were busted down and made illegal, until the unions rose up and did their part to help defeat the Communists. But for me, personally, I don't want to be part of a union.

And what I have seen in the UAW, while I was in it, is much the same as TD was talking about. I would suggest that, instead of attacking the Turtle with inane phrases, you come up with a thought-out counter argument for what he posted. But I don't think you can, because I don't think that kind of counter arguments actually exists.



That cuts both ways.
you are entitled to your opinion, and i've no problem with it, but my take on turtle is quite different....what he told was a 'personal experience' story, one which i have serious doubts about, check that , one which i have no faith in whatsoever. his views on unions, and those who are members of a union, or advocate union posistions, advocate on those issues that affect working people, are well known....anything he says, in my personal opinion, needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt, maybe even the whole great salt lake. i like to think that i can read people well, and the 'read' i get on turtle is the exact opposite of yours.
 
you are entitled to your opinion, and i've no problem with it, but my take on turtle is quite different....what he told was a 'personal experience' story, one which i have serious doubts about, check that , one which i have no faith in whatsoever. his views on unions, and those who are members of a union, or advocate union posistions, advocate on those issues that affect working people, are well known....anything he says, in my personal opinion, needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt, maybe even the whole great salt lake. i like to think that i can read people well, and the 'read' i get on turtle is the exact opposite of yours.

Be that as it may, Turtle's experience with unions coincides with my own experience with unions. IMHO, he is telling the truth. Now, that is about as much agreement he and I will have on this issue, because we are on opposite ends of the argument. However, I respect his opinion, even if I don't agree with it, and just because he doesn't agree with me is no reason for me to pretty much call him a liar, which he isn't.....

He is a lawyer, which is worse...... Badaboom :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
The Unions have built in voter turn out machinations in place, to get this defeated will require enough voters informed as to the fact that if Sb5 goes down, their Representatives got over turned by thuggery.
There is a simple reason that Public Sector Unions can thrive, unlike in the Private Sector, Government's aren't held to "must make a profit" so Unions can demand more and more and in return they promise to help elect the folks that will keep handing over tax payer monies.

It's rather disgusting, and one of the reason the AFL-CIO President back in the day before Government Workers were allowed to Unionize scoffed at the idea, why FDR refused to allow it. It's wrong.

BUT, political greed for power won out, and states are forced to fight the machine of Union Thuggery to regain control over their tax payer monies. I must say it's no shock Public Unions back Democrats.
 
The Unions have built in voter turn out machinations in place, to get this defeated will require enough voters informed as to the fact that if Sb5 goes down, their Representatives got over turned by thuggery.
There is a simple reason that Public Sector Unions can thrive, unlike in the Private Sector, Government's aren't held to "must make a profit" so Unions can demand more and more and in return they promise to help elect the folks that will keep handing over tax payer monies.

It's rather disgusting, and one of the reason the AFL-CIO President back in the day before Government Workers were allowed to Unionize scoffed at the idea, why FDR refused to allow it. It's wrong.

BUT, political greed for power won out, and states are forced to fight the machine of Union Thuggery to regain control over their tax payer monies. I must say it's no shock Public Unions back Democrats.
what a load of manure...a group of citizens have decided that they did not like what their elected officials were doing, and took steps to get the issue on the ballot, for a vote by the people.....union thuggery my ass.
 
what a load of manure...a group of citizens have decided that they did not like what their elected officials were doing, and took steps to get the issue on the ballot, for a vote by the people.....union thuggery my ass.

IT IS Union Thuggery. Who benefits from this ballot measure? Unionized Public Sector Workers. Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives. It's not. That's bull It's a group of people who stand to lose political and monetary gains.

Public Sector Unions get their money from the Tax Payers, they support those politicians that will keep giving them money, and in return they keep those politicians in power.
 
IT IS Union Thuggery. Who benefits from this ballot measure? Unionized Public Sector Workers. Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives. It's not. That's bull It's a group of people who stand to lose political and monetary gains.

Public Sector Unions get their money from the Tax Payers, they support those politicians that will keep giving them money, and in return they keep those politicians in power.
are you saying that union members are not citizens? really????
 
are you saying that union members are not citizens? really????

No, I didn't say that, strawman. Nice try. These are folks with a direct benefit to be gained by repealing Sb5.

Some facts for you:

1. Ohio is facing a $10 billion deficit in 2011.


2. Ohio’s government workers receive far more pay than their private-sector counterparts.

The median government worker in Ohio makes 24.6 percent more than his or her private-sector counterpart. An estimated 46 percent of government workers will receive a pay increase this year or next. With Ohio losing more than 600,000 private sector jobs in the last 10 years, it is unsustainable for taxpayers to continue paying government workers at these bloated levels.

3. Ohio’s state and local government employees’ pensions are severely underfunded.

A recent study by The Pew Center on the States found that the $3.35 trillion required to pay all the states’ current and retired public sector benefits is underfunded by $1 trillion. For their part, Ohio is the fifth worst state and Cincinnati is the third worst city, underfunded by $20 billion and $4 billion respectfully.

5. SB5 is a very modest proposal.

If enacted, public sector unions will still be allowed to exist. Unions would still be allowed to negotiate working conditions and hours but healthcare and sick leave cannot be bargained. SB5 just sets the guidelines on what public sector unions can collective bargain for in Ohio.

8. A clear conflict of interest exists between politicians and public sector unions.

Collective bargaining in the public sector means that public employee unions negotiate their salaries and benefits with self-interested politicians. It has given politicians the opportunity to reward their campaign contributors. The Center for Responsive Politics reports that five of the top ten contributors to congressional and presidential campaigns in the past twenty years are labor unions. Half of the top twenty political action committees by total expenditures are unions.

9. It will limit pay increases to merit-based only.

SB5 will remove automatic pay increases and introduce a merit-based only system. At a time when Ohioans are struggling to find a job, public servants in secure jobs should at the very least be paid based on how good they are at their jobs.

Top 10 Reasons to Support SB5 in Ohio to Limit Public Sector Collective Bargaining | FreedomWorks
 
No, I didn't say that, strawman. Nice try. These are folks with a direct benefit to be gained by repealing Sb5.

Some facts for you:



Top 10 Reasons to Support SB5 in Ohio to Limit Public Sector Collective Bargaining | FreedomWorks
"Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives. " your own words say different, so no, no strawman. do you honestly think that only union members signed the petition to get this on the ballot?
 
"Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives. " your own words say different, so no, no strawman. do you honestly think that only union members signed the petition to get this on the ballot?

Union members, democrats and a few misguided fools that think Unions are good for the state.
 
Union members, democrats and a few misguided fools that think Unions are good for the state.
so, in your world, union members, and democrats, and what you called 'misguided fools'---translation, those that don't share your views--are not Citizens. correct?
 
so, in your world, union members, and democrats, and what you called 'misguided fools'---translation, those that don't share your views--are not Citizens. correct?

Where in did I ever claim they weren't citizens, you'[re stuck on this strawman, it's all you've got.

I said:
Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives.
It's quite obvious I was referring to people that have nothing to gain personally from the repeal of Sb5.

Further more:
It's not. That's bull It's a group of people who stand to lose political and monetary gains.
I clarify this point by explaining they stand to gain from repealing Sb5.

So you can continue on this juvenile line I'm claiming they aren't citizens... I won't stop you form her eon out, you're free to keep proving to everyone you're not someone to be taken seriously, or you can return to the actual points being discussed.
 
Where in did I ever claim they weren't citizens, you'[re stuck on this strawman, it's all you've got.

I said:

It's quite obvious I was referring to people that have nothing to gain personally from the repeal of Sb5.

Further more:

I clarify this point by explaining they stand to gain from repealing Sb5.

So you can continue on this juvenile line I'm claiming they aren't citizens... I won't stop you form her eon out, you're free to keep proving to everyone you're not someone to be taken seriously, or you can return to the actual points being discussed.
again, your words "Don't act like this is a group of private citizens outraged at their Representatives." this was in reference to those who have signed the petition to repeal sb5. "don't pretend" implies i shouldnt look at them as a group of private citizens, WHICH THEY ARE. they are citizens of the United States, and citizens of the state of Ohio. i don't 'pretend' anything. anyhoo, carry on, i see your not interested in honest debate.
 
Back
Top Bottom