- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 75,619
- Reaction score
- 39,894
- Location
- USofA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
We need a nick name for Palin Email Conspiracy people. Any ideas?
Email-er doesn't really work for me.
redactionists?
We need a nick name for Palin Email Conspiracy people. Any ideas?
Email-er doesn't really work for me.
If you guys want to tone down your MEAN GIRLS imitation and get back to reality ---
Sarah Palin e-mails: What was redacted? - The Washington Post
2,300 redacted or edited
953 held back altogether
I have no idea what is in there? Do you?
This is so very typical of some on the far right here circling the wagons and attacking.
If you guys want to tone down your MEAN GIRLS imitation and get back to reality ---
Sarah Palin e-mails: What was redacted? - The Washington Post
2,300 redacted or edited
953 held back altogether
I have no idea what is in there? Do you?
redactionists?
yes. i do. moon landings.
we never landed on the moon. The redacted Palin emails prove it.
If you guys want to tone down your MEAN GIRLS imitation and get back to reality ---
Sarah Palin e-mails: What was redacted? - The Washington Post
2,300 redacted or edited
953 held back altogether
I have no idea what is in there? Do you?
This is so very typical of some on the far right here circling the wagons and attacking.
redactionistas?
The three of you are a wonderful illustration of illogic and denial of reality.
Pot, meet kettle.
Sorry to have asked the really tought questions here that would seem obvious to almost anyone other than a true believer willing to paint the rosiest picture for purely partisan reasons.
Right. We undertsand why a small percentage of emails were redacted, you don't, and we are the partisans
mea cupla, mean cupla, mea maxima culpa.
Had the three of you been in the Nixon White House in 73& 74 I am sure your line would have been "what the hell are you worried about 18 missing minutes of tape recordings for? You got all the rest of it so shut the hell up You don't know whats on that missing tape so you must be some kind of nut to even bring it up ."
Nobody is alleging anything criminal or even wrong with the Palin emails. All I am saying is that what we have is incomplete and we know there is more out there. I do not know what is in the rest of it. Do you?
Nor do I care.
To be honest, I have already read the most daming emails about Palin sent between her and her own right hand man in the book BLIND ALLEGIANCE. Its there if you care to read it.
That's the book from the guy who used to work for her, right? The one under investigation for possibly using emails with information that was not already made available to the general public... a crime in Alaska. That guy?
Fat chance on that I bet.
The three of you have already demonstrated that a bit of info which agrees with your preconceived biases is much better than a complete picture which may challenge them.
Again... Pot? Meet Kettle.
I haven't read through them or even read through any digest of the emails.
Was Palin confused by politics as the OP says? Or is the author of the article in the OP bemused himself?
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?How many emails were redacted?
How many emails were not released at all?
I wonder what is in those?
An incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?
only every other one on every other day of the week in every other week during every other month. Other than that................
Your incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.
See? We can spout nonsense too.
The main difference being that with you it simply comes out that way.
How many emails were redacted?
How many emails were not released at all?
I wonder what is in those?
An incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?
must have really struck a cord earlier, huh :roflyou
The three of you are a wonderful illustration of illogic and denial of reality.
Sorry to have asked the really tought questions here that would seem obvious to almost anyone other than a true believer willing to paint the rosiest picture for purely partisan reasons.
mea cupla, mean cupla, mea maxima culpa.
Had the three of you been in the Nixon White House in 73& 74 I am sure your line would have been "what the hell are you worried about 18 missing minutes of tape recordings for? You got all the rest of it so shut the hell up You don't know whats on that missing tape so you must be some kind of nut to even bring it up ."
Nobody is alleging anything criminal or even wrong with the Palin emails. All I am saying is that what we have is incomplete and we know there is more out there. I do not know what is in the rest of it. Do you?
To be honest, I have already read the most daming emails about Palin sent between her and her own right hand man in the book BLIND ALLEGIANCE. Its there if you care to read it.
Fat chance on that I bet.
The three of you have already demonstrated that a bit of info which agrees with your preconceived biases is much better than a complete picture which may challenge them.