• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Way: Sarah Palin email frenzy backfires on her media antagonists

If you guys want to tone down your MEAN GIRLS imitation and get back to reality ---

Sarah Palin e-mails: What was redacted? - The Washington Post

2,300 redacted or edited
953 held back altogether

I have no idea what is in there? Do you?

This is so very typical of some on the far right here circling the wagons and attacking.
 
Last edited:
haymarket said:
If you guys want to tone down your MEAN GIRLS imitation and get back to reality ---

Sarah Palin e-mails: What was redacted? - The Washington Post

2,300 redacted or edited
953 held back altogether

I have no idea what is in there? Do you?

This is so very typical of some on the far right here circling the wagons and attacking.
Click to expand...



No, but don't let that stop you from speculating.


As a supposed "chief of staff" for some low level councilman, I think you are being more than dishonest when you pretend that you don't understand why things would be redacted.
 
It was explained by the State offices that did the redacting that what was blacked out was either personal (which is none of your damn business) or it was attorney client information and that too (is none of your damn business).

A word for the Liberals. When something happens or you receive information that confuses you or you don't understand, chances are, that it's not really a conspiracy, and you don't want to let fear of the unknown get the better of you, some might even question ones psychiatric stability if you do.
 
eh, maybe it just belongs under Palin Derangement Syndrome.
 
The three of you are a wonderful illustration of illogic and denial of reality.

Sorry to have asked the really tought questions here that would seem obvious to almost anyone other than a true believer willing to paint the rosiest picture for purely partisan reasons.

mea cupla, mean cupla, mea maxima culpa.

Had the three of you been in the Nixon White House in 73& 74 I am sure your line would have been "what the hell are you worried about 18 missing minutes of tape recordings for? You got all the rest of it so shut the hell up You don't know whats on that missing tape so you must be some kind of nut to even bring it up ."

Nobody is alleging anything criminal or even wrong with the Palin emails. All I am saying is that what we have is incomplete and we know there is more out there. I do not know what is in the rest of it. Do you?

To be honest, I have already read the most daming emails about Palin sent between her and her own right hand man in the book BLIND ALLEGIANCE. Its there if you care to read it.

Fat chance on that I bet.

The three of you have already demonstrated that a bit of info which agrees with your preconceived biases is much better than a complete picture which may challenge them.
 
Last edited:
I haven't read through them or even read through any digest of the emails.

Was Palin confused by politics as the OP says? Or is the author of the article in the OP bemused himself?
 
haymarket said:
The three of you are a wonderful illustration of illogic and denial of reality.
Pot, meet kettle.


Sorry to have asked the really tought questions here that would seem obvious to almost anyone other than a true believer willing to paint the rosiest picture for purely partisan reasons.
Right. We undertsand why a small percentage of emails were redacted, you don't, and we are the partisans :rolleyes:

mea cupla, mean cupla, mea maxima culpa.

Had the three of you been in the Nixon White House in 73& 74 I am sure your line would have been "what the hell are you worried about 18 missing minutes of tape recordings for? You got all the rest of it so shut the hell up You don't know whats on that missing tape so you must be some kind of nut to even bring it up ."

Nobody is alleging anything criminal or even wrong with the Palin emails. All I am saying is that what we have is incomplete and we know there is more out there. I do not know what is in the rest of it. Do you?
Nor do I care.

To be honest, I have already read the most daming emails about Palin sent between her and her own right hand man in the book BLIND ALLEGIANCE. Its there if you care to read it.
That's the book from the guy who used to work for her, right? The one under investigation for possibly using emails with information that was not already made available to the general public... a crime in Alaska. That guy?

Fat chance on that I bet.

The three of you have already demonstrated that a bit of info which agrees with your preconceived biases is much better than a complete picture which may challenge them.
Again... Pot? Meet Kettle.
Click to expand...

same old Haymarket.....
 
Simon W. Moon said:
I haven't read through them or even read through any digest of the emails.

Was Palin confused by politics as the OP says? Or is the author of the article in the OP bemused himself?
Click to expand...

the OP was the victim of a conspiracy to make Palin look like an attentive and involved Governor.
 
haymarket said:
How many emails were redacted?

How many emails were not released at all?

I wonder what is in those?

An incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.
Click to expand...
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?
 
American said:
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?
Click to expand...

only every other one on every other day of the week in every other week during every other month. Other than that................
 
Whovian said:
Your incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.

See? We can spout nonsense too.
Click to expand...

The main difference being that with you it simply comes out that way.
 
haymarket said:
How many emails were redacted?

How many emails were not released at all?

I wonder what is in those?

An incomplete picture does not contain the entire story.
Click to expand...

I fully agree-that's why I didn't vote for Obama
 
American said:
Send me all your emails, I want to see them. Did you read all of Obama's emails?
Click to expand...

hell we don't even know what his grades in HS and college were
 
Whovian said:
must have really struck a cord earlier, huh :rofl:mad:you
Click to expand...

When you reprint something I said and then make a comment of your own - it works much much better if it actually makes sense in relation to the comment that you reproduced.
 
haymarket said:
The three of you are a wonderful illustration of illogic and denial of reality.

Sorry to have asked the really tought questions here that would seem obvious to almost anyone other than a true believer willing to paint the rosiest picture for purely partisan reasons.

mea cupla, mean cupla, mea maxima culpa.

Had the three of you been in the Nixon White House in 73& 74 I am sure your line would have been "what the hell are you worried about 18 missing minutes of tape recordings for? You got all the rest of it so shut the hell up You don't know whats on that missing tape so you must be some kind of nut to even bring it up ."

Nobody is alleging anything criminal or even wrong with the Palin emails. All I am saying is that what we have is incomplete and we know there is more out there. I do not know what is in the rest of it. Do you?

To be honest, I have already read the most daming emails about Palin sent between her and her own right hand man in the book BLIND ALLEGIANCE. Its there if you care to read it.

Fat chance on that I bet.

The three of you have already demonstrated that a bit of info which agrees with your preconceived biases is much better than a complete picture which may challenge them.
Click to expand...



True believers will often claim that others hold blind allegence to a person or an agenda to mask thier single minded true believer views and speculation. True believers in this case indicate that if we all are not suspect of the few redacted portions of these released emails that we are the enemy.

True believers when cornered in thier illogical partisan mouth foaming will often resort to made up "i bet that if" statements that are neither true but proven false. But that does not stop the true believer, for any dissent of his true believer ways must be destroyed as the enemy of his reality of his own making.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom