• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

What candidates from the GOP that are actually running get followed and dogged by the liberal press like Palin does?
I dunno, which of the GOP who are actually running are driving cross country in a bus like this one which screams, "I'm ready for my closeup, Mr. Demille!!"


PalinBusTour.jpg



Seems for them to do this they must fear Palin could beat Obama
What's to fear? She ranks near the bottom of all the GOP lightweights.
 
Not at all. I'm not always right, although it might seem that way to you because you are almost always wrong.



See, another example of how you are almost always wrong.

See you prove my point you are always right I am always wrong, in your mind anyway
 
I dunno, which of the GOP who are actually running are driving cross country in a bus like this one which screams, "I'm ready for my closeup, Mr. Demille!!"


PalinBusTour.jpg




What's to fear? She ranks near the bottom of all the GOP lightweights.

It is better than leaving under God out of the pledge of allegiance
 
It is better than leaving under God out of the pledge of allegiance

I leave "under god" out of the pledge when I say it. It is an abomination from the post-ww2 era of commie-madness. It and the crap on our money should be removed.

The constitution and all it has enshrined can stand alone, without the bible; if someone believes otherwise, they are unamerican. If one must use religion to support their government or political philosophy, than their reasoning is flawed or lacking. One can't say "because god says so" in regard to legislation, because god might say something ridiculous to someone and then we're all screwed.
 
Last edited:
It is better than leaving under God out of the pledge of allegiance
True, Sarah "The Quitter" Palin does mention G-d on her flashy bus ... she also quotes, "one nation" ... "indivisible."

... indivisible!

Her husband wants Alaska to secede from the nation! How indivisible is that?
:shock:
 
See you prove my point you are always right I am always wrong, in your mind anyway

I can actually be wrong about something, but if it's in a debate with you, it just means we're both wrong.

But instead of whining about the fact that you are always wrong, why don't you just start educating yourself?

DP's not about to give out participation trophies just so that you can feel better about your pathetic arguments. This isn't little league soccer.

So stop being such a whiney liberal and take personal responsibility for yourself and improve your arguments.
 
I leave "under god" out of the pledge when I say it. It is an abomination from the post-ww2 era of commie-madness. It and the crap on our money should be removed.

The constitution and all it has enshrined can stand alone, without the bible; if someone believes otherwise, they are unamerican. If one must use religion to support their government or political philosophy, than their reasoning is flawed or lacking. One can't say "because god says so" in regard to legislation, because god might say something ridiculous to someone and then we're all screwed.

It was put in the year I was born which is way after WW2
 
True, Sarah "The Quitter" Palin does mention G-d on her flashy bus ... she also quotes, "one nation" ... "indivisible."

... indivisible!

Her husband wants Alaska to secede from the nation! How indivisible is that?
:shock:

More hate and no substance. Now you want to talk about her husband
 
I can actually be wrong about something, but if it's in a debate with you, it just means we're both wrong.

But instead of whining about the fact that you are always wrong, why don't you just start educating yourself?

DP's not about to give out participation trophies just so that you can feel better about your pathetic arguments. This isn't little league soccer.

So stop being such a whiney liberal and take personal responsibility for yourself and improve your arguments.

Why don't you try backing up your useless opinions with facts
 
Why don't you try backing up your useless opinions with facts

I have often provided facts for you, but you usually fail to understand the most simple of concepts and then pretend that no facts were given. Just because you are intellectually inept does not mean that otehrs do not provide facts. It's just that no fact has yet been created that can pierce through a cranium with the density of a black hole. If a fact ever manages to get past your cranial event horizon, a paradox of time and space could occur.
 
So no matter the subject you are always right and anyone that disagrees is clueless. You sound just like a democrat

Does anyone want to call Conservative, Bad Mutha and Zimmer and tell them that they are apparently Democrats?

I'm sure that would be news to them.
 
I swear, if a Palin thread can last longer than 5 posts...she might deserve to be...naaaaaaaaaahhhh. No way. One thing for sure. We all know more about Paul Revere's wild night out.
 
Now you want to talk about her husband
Why not? She is promoting one nation, "indivisible," yet the man she is married to doesn't believe that. Isn't it reasonable to believe she feels the same as her husband.
 
Why not? She is promoting one nation, "indivisible," yet the man she is married to doesn't believe that. Isn't it reasonable to believe she feels the same as her husband.

Maybe she has a new and unique definition of he word "indivisible".
 
I have often provided facts for you, but you usually fail to understand the most simple of concepts and then pretend that no facts were given. Just because you are intellectually inept does not mean that otehrs do not provide facts. It's just that no fact has yet been created that can pierce through a cranium with the density of a black hole. If a fact ever manages to get past your cranial event horizon, a paradox of time and space could occur.

No you provide partial facts and never look at the whole story
 
Why not? She is promoting one nation, "indivisible," yet the man she is married to doesn't believe that. Isn't it reasonable to believe she feels the same as her husband.

Do you agree with everything your wife thinks?
 
Do you agree with everything your wife thinks?
Why do you answer my question with a question?

Conservatives made a huge deal about making Obama guilty by association. His association with Wright, his association with Ayers. Well Sarah "The Quitter" Palin has been married to her husband longer than Obama attended Wright's church. Since Conservatives claim people are guilty by association, than so is Sarah Palin. And her husband of 20 something years believes Alaska should secede from the rest of the nation. If I'm not mistaken, I believe he even joined some group pushing for that.

Well that make "The Quitter" guilty of that too. Seems she's trying to hide that by advertising the opposite on her bus.
 
Why do you answer my question with a question?

Conservatives made a huge deal about making Obama guilty by association. His association with Wright, his association with Ayers. Well Sarah "The Quitter" Palin has been married to her husband longer than Obama attended Wright's church. Since Conservatives claim people are guilty by association, than so is Sarah Palin. And her husband of 20 something years believes Alaska should secede from the rest of the nation. If I'm not mistaken, I believe he even joined some group pushing for that.

Well that make "The Quitter" guilty of that too. Seems she's trying to hide that by advertising the opposite on her bus.

Nice dodge to my question. Problem with Obama is he tried to lie about his associations
 
Back
Top Bottom