• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

How many Global warming scientist are not government funded?

Wait, are you moving the goal posts now to just discuss "global warming scientists" (whatever they are, I've never taken a global warming class in all of my science courses) and not "scientists" as you initially claimed?
 
um... no. They can't. It is logically impossible to have the goal to become President of the United States, and never run for office.

Yes, it is. People want to run and don't run everyday.

It is relevant because it shows the bias and hypocrisy

No it's irrelevant because the thread is about Sarah Palin and not everyone else.
 
Really? Around the entire world?!?!??!

Of course, The US Federal Government funds every scientist in the world. That's how they can keep the Great Conspiracy going. It also explains why the government is so far into the red.

Let's see.... this thread was about what again? Sarah and her silliness, yes that was it, Silly Sarah. How it got around to the Great Conspiracy, let's see... Oh, yes! It was because ptif was posting here.
 
Whovian said:
um... no. They can't. It is logically impossible to have the goal to become President of the United States, and never run for office.

Yes, it is. People want to run and don't run everyday..

No, it is not.

The definition of a goal is
a result or achievement toward which effort is directed
.

If your goal is to become President, and you do not direct any effort in that direction (such as running for the office), then you have no goal after all.

Simple logic.
 
No, it is not.

The definition of a goal is .

If your goal is to become President, and you do not direct any effort in that direction (such as running for the office), then you have no goal after all.

Simple logic.

This is so far from the truth. You can have a goal and not make an attempt to do anything about it.
 
This is so far from the truth. You can have a goal and not make an attempt to do anything about it.

That's not a goal. That's a fantasy. I can fantasize about becoming president, about making a gazillion dollars, or about winning the Super Bowl, but if I don't run, don't invest, and don't learn to play football, I'm just daydreaming.
 
That's not a goal. That's a fantasy. I can fantasize about becoming president, about making a gazillion dollars, or about winning the Super Bowl, but if I don't run, don't invest, and don't learn to play football, I'm just daydreaming.

Sarah Palin would love to be president but she has no chance.
 
Whovian said:
No, it is not.

The definition of a goal is...
the result or achievement toward which effort is directed
.

If your goal is to become President, and you do not direct any effort in that direction (such as running for the office), then you have no goal after all.

Simple logic.

This is so far from the truth. You can have a goal and not make an attempt to do anything about it.

Not according to every dictionary known to modern man. If you make no effort to obtain it... take no action to make it happen, by definition it is not a goal. You HAVE to actually do something... ANYTHING... towards making it happen.

Are you always in denial like this?
 
Dittohead not! said:
That's not a goal. That's a fantasy. I can fantasize about becoming president, about making a gazillion dollars, or about winning the Super Bowl, but if I don't run, don't invest, and don't learn to play football, I'm just daydreaming.
Sarah Palin would love to be president but she has no chance.

She is also doing nothing to accomplish it. She has not declared she is running. She has not filed, or even stated in an interview she wants to run. Until she does, it's a fantasy.

Thank you for proving Dittohead not!'s point so perfectly.
 
Sarah Palin would love to be president but she has no chance.

The second part of that statement is correct beyond a doubt, but the first is a matter of speculation. Does she want to be president, or does she want to stay in the limelight created by the public thinking that she might want to be president? She's making a ton of money from her notoriety after all.
 
Not according to every dictionary known to modern man. If you make no effort to obtain it... take no action to make it happen, by definition it is not a goal. You HAVE to actually do something... ANYTHING... towards making it happen.

Are you always in denial like this?

I am not in denial. I stand by my statements continue to disagree!


I don't see the majority of American's voting for an unqualified woman.

She is also doing nothing to accomplish it. She has not declared she is running. She has not filed, or even stated in an interview she wants to run. Until she does, it's a fantasy.

Thank you for proving Dittohead not!'s point so perfectly.

I think it's obvious she is going to run. LOL
 
I am not in denial. I stand by my statements continue to disagree!
Yup. Denial. The dictionary's all say you're wrong, by definition. But hey, what the **** do they know compared to you right?

Please your head gets any bigger, you'll need a forklift to tote it around.
 
So the Museum told her misinformation?

Why does it matter where the misinformation came from? It could have came from elementary school, from a documentary, etc. That doesn't matter. You're simply trying to attribute her erroneous comment to somebody else and say she isn't responsible for it, and it came out of her mouth. We have the video. She's a human, she made a mistake... Why can't you simply admit that she said something that was incorrect and move on? LOL
 
Why does it matter where the misinformation came from? It could have came from elementary school, from a documentary, etc. That doesn't matter. You're simply trying to attribute her erroneous comment to somebody else and say she isn't responsible for it, and it came out of her mouth. We have the video. She's a human, she made a mistake... Why can't you simply admit that she said something that was incorrect and move on? LOL

Not only did she make a mistake, but then she got on TV and told the world that she was right all along.

And now, her Kool Aid imbibing followers are trying to rewrite history to say that Paul Revere actually rode through town ringing bells and firing shots to warn the British that they couldn't take our arms away.

Now, that's just amusing.
 
Not only did she make a mistake, but then she got on TV and told the world that she was right all along.

And now, her Kool Aid imbibing followers are trying to rewrite history to say that Paul Revere actually rode through town ringing bells and firing shots to warn the British that they couldn't take our arms away.

Now, that's just amusing.
And that was meant to be part of his ride!

Unbelievable.
 
Back
Top Bottom