• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere's Ride to Protect the Second Amendment

BDBoop said:
Your italicized bit is exactly what she said. Those who defend her are exhibiting the exact same immature mindset as she does: The inability to gracefully admit error.
Click to expand...

If Palin knew so damn much about history, she would have know what blood libel meant... She isn't using that word anymore. Quick, somebody ask Palin if the liberal media is waging a blood libel on her over this.... gotta question! :roll:
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Then prove it. Prove a museum is as dumb as Sarah Palin and like Palin, doesn't know history.

But at least we're finally making some progress here ... at least you're finally beginning to comprehend what she said is wrong. But being the Palin cultist you are, you can't allow her to take responibility for her error.
Click to expand...

She had just come out of a museum tour. Was what she said from the tour?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Nope, one cannot assume the museum tour does not know the history it teaches. Now you're making **** up to protect her image of being a dolt.

How sad.
Click to expand...

So you have no proof what happened on the tour and you are giving your opinions and not facts
 
ptif219 said:
She had just come out of a museum tour. Was what she said from the tour?
Click to expand...
So your position now is that it's ok that she doesn't know the history of Paul Revere because she was taught erroneous history?
 
ptif219 said:
So you have no proof what happened on the tour and you are giving your opinions and not facts
Click to expand...
Actually, you're the one asserting she was taught incorrect history on that tour. The onus to prove that is on you. There is no evidence of that, in fact if anything, there's evidence to the contrary.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
So your position now is that it's ok that she doesn't know the history of Paul Revere because she was taught erroneous history?
Click to expand...

How does she know if it is wrong? Do you know if what you were taught is all correct or could some of it be wrong?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Actually, you're the one asserting she was taught incorrect history on that tour. The onus to prove that is on you. There is no evidence of that, in fact if anything, there's evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

The man admitted he may have not explained it correctly
 
ptif219 said:
How does she know if it is wrong? Do you know if what you were taught is all correct or could some of it be wrong?
Click to expand...
Apparently, I was taught what everyone else (except Sarah Palin and you) was taught.
 
ptif219 said:
The man admitted he may have not explained it correctly
Click to expand...
Ummm, no, he did not say that. He said he informed her that Revere had founded their bell ringing guild years earlier as a teenager, he said nothing about Revere ringing any bells or firing any guns during his famous midnight ride. He also said nothing about telling her that part of that ride was to warn the British. Those were Palin's unfortunate choice of words, not his.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Ummm, no, he did not say that. He said he informed her that Revere had founded their bell ringing guild years earlier as a teenager, he said nothing about Revere ringing any bells or firing any guns during his famous midnight ride. He also said nothing about telling her that part of that ride was to warn the British. Those were Palin's unfortunate choice of words, not his.
Click to expand...

How do you know?
 
ptif219 said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...
Cause he explained what he told her.

And you still haven't answered my question ... are you now admitting she got it wrong but excusing her because of what he said?
 
Oh, I would LOVE to know the true answer to that. First reaction: Did the Palin supporters go "Que!?" or did they say "At last, the truth is out! I KNEW everything I learned in elementary school was inaccurate! Next, I want to know the truth about Lincoln!"
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Cause he explained what he told her.

And you still haven't answered my question ... are you now admitting she got it wrong but excusing her because of what he said?
Click to expand...

She did not get it wrong. She was repeating what she heard in the museum.

Whats funny is how the left goes after Palin when shee is not newas and not even running for public office. You all look stupid condemning someone who does not matter and is not newsworthy
 
ptif219 said:
She did not get it wrong. She was repeating what she heard in the museum.
Click to expand...
Not according to what the vicar said. He said he told her that Revere had founded their bell ringing guild years earlier as a teenager, he didn't say he told her that Revere was ringing any bells on the night of his midnight ride -- those were her words, not his. The vicar said he told her that upon being captured, Revere had warned those British troops that the minutemen had been alerted, he didn't say Revere warned them they would not keep our arms from us -- those were her words, not his. He did not say he informed her that warning the British was to be part of Revere's ride -- those were her words not his.

ptif219 said:
Whats funny is how the left goes after Palin when shee is not newas and not even running for public office.
Click to expand...
So what? The right goes after people on the left all the time who are not running for office.
 
BDBoop said:
Oh, I would LOVE to know the true answer to that. First reaction: Did the Palin supporters go "Que!?" or did they say "At last, the truth is out! I KNEW everything I learned in elementary school was inaccurate! Next, I want to know the truth about Lincoln!"
Click to expand...

The latter of course. As for Lincoln, you do know that he rode through the South, ringing bells and shooting muskets and telling the southerners that we can too take away your slaves.

Or, did you buy that other stuff that was taught in elementary school?
 
ptif219 said:
So this guy is saying he did not explain properly and he confused Palin
Click to expand...

He explained it properly... That's his job. He said he gave her the standard tour. She was confused and confused herself. It was too much info for her small brain to absorb. He thinks she should have spent more time there, and probably wouldn't have been confused... So it seems she wasn't there to actually learn, but there as a stunt or she would have spend enough time in the museum actually learn.
 
Last edited:
ptif219 said:
The man admitted he may have not explained it correctly
Click to expand...

umm... no he didn't. He said Palin was in a hurry. She wasn't there to learn, she was there to stir up attention with her bus tour and get herself in the damn news as always. Normal people don't walk in a museum and demand the tour guide change their tour around and skip ****... especially not if they want to learn.
 
Dittohead not! said:
The latter of course. As for Lincoln, you do know that he rode through the South, ringing bells and shooting muskets and telling the southerners that we can too take away your slaves.

Or, did you buy that other stuff that was taught in elementary school?
Click to expand...

No, I knew there was much they weren't telling me. For instance, the allegation that the North won the Civil War. Obviously that's not how it went down. My great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather rode through Pig's Eye, ringing muskets and loading bells while he warned the conservatives that the federalists were coming! But you don't see that in the history books now, do you.
 
BDBoop said:
No, I knew there was much they weren't telling me. For instance, the allegation that the North won the Civil War. Obviously that's not how it went down. My great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather rode through Pig's Eye, ringing muskets and loading bells while he warned the conservatives that the federalists were coming! But you don't see that in the history books now, do you.
Click to expand...

Certainly not in those liberal government printed textbooks that brainwash kids into thinking that Paul Revere went off to warn the Rebels that the British regulars were coming, no.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Not according to what the vicar said. He said he told her that Revere had founded their bell ringing guild years earlier as a teenager, he didn't say he told her that Revere was ringing any bells on the night of his midnight ride -- those were her words, not his. The vicar said he told her that upon being captured, Revere had warned those British troops that the minutemen had been alerted, he didn't say Revere warned them they would not keep our arms from us -- those were her words, not his. He did not say he informed her that warning the British was to be part of Revere's ride -- those were her words not his.


So what? The right goes after people on the left all the time who are not running for office.
Click to expand...

He also said it may have been to much to fast in to short odf a time period.



Name those the right follow around and harrass like the left does to Palin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom